×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.Partner
Mr David G Barker

Mr David G Barker

Not yet reviewed

One East Washington Street, Suite 2700, Phoenix, AZ 85004

Commercial Litigation, Copyright Litigation, Creative Expression, Science, Technology, and Complex Systems Litigation and 7 more

About Mr David G Barker

Mr David G Barker is a lawyer practicing commercial litigation, copyright litigation, creative expression, science, technology, and complex systems litigation and 7 other areas of law. David received a B.S. degree from Brigham Young University, and has been licensed for 19 years. David practices at Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. in Phoenix, AZ.

Mr David G Barker (Phoenix, Arizona)

Reviews for Mr David G Barker

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Intellectual Property
  • Other 8
    • Copyright Litigation
    • Creative Expression, Science, Technology, and Complex Systems Litigation
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Internet
    • Patent Litigation
    • Technology
    • Trademark and Unfair Competition Litigation
    • Trade Secrets Litigation

Practice Details

  • Languages
    Swedish
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Experience: Lead trial counsel for Arizona training company pursuing claims of trademark infringement
    trade secret misappropriation in Maricopa County Superior Court
    Lead counsel for Arizona solar company defending against an inter partes review at the Patent Trial
    Appeal Board
    Trial counsel for global research
    design company in Northern District of California defending against claims asserting breach of a development agreement
    Trial counsel for Arizona recreation company pursuing claims of trademark infringement in Maricopa County Superior Court
    Trial counsel for Utah higher education provider pursuing claims for breach of fiduciary duty, fraud,
    civil conspiracy in Utah State District Court
    Arbitration counsel for Arizona cannabis company pursuing claims for breach of contract in the American Arbitration Association
    Lead counsel for real estate company pursuing claims of copyright
    trademark infringement
    breach of contract in Southern District of Texas
    Lead counsel for Arizona firearms manufacturer pursuing claims for patent infringement in the District of Arizona
    Lead counsel for Arizona real estate developer pursuing claim for cancellation of a trademark in the Trademark Trial
    Appeal Board
    Counsel for Arizona consumer products company defending against patent infringement claims in the District of Arizona.
    Counsel for cryptocurrency company in trademark enforcement matters
    Counsel for trademark owners pursuing claims for trademark cybersquatting under the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP)

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2006, Arizona
    2006, Supreme Court of Arizona
    United States Patent and Trademark Office
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    United States District Court, District of Arizona
    Memberships

    Professional Memberships and Activities

    •American Bar Association
    •Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (2015-2019)
    •American Intellectual Property Law Association (2012-2016)

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Duke University School of Law
    Class of 2006
    J.D.
    Duke Law and Technology Review

    Duke University School of Law
    Class of 2006
    J.D.
    2006 Executive Editor

    Duke University School of Law
    Class of 2006
    J.D.
    Secretary

    Duke University School of Law
    Class of 2006
    J.D.
    Duke Intellectual Property and Cyberlaw Society
    Other Education
    Brigham Young University
    B.S.
    Member

    Brigham Young University
    B.S.
    2002 Heritage Scholar

    Brigham Young University
    B.S.
    Mechanical Engineering

    Brigham Young University
    B.S.
    Tau Beta Pi

    Brigham Young University
    Class of 2003
    M.S.

Email Mr David G Barker

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions