×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
no photo
Pro

Charles E. Markle

Not yet reviewed

2375 East Camelback Road, Suite 700, Phoenix, AZ 85016

Litigation, Commercial Litigation and Real Estate Litigation

About Charles E. Markle

Charlie Markle works with commercial clients to develop strategies for addressing legal matters with or without litigation. His commercial litigation practice includes matters related to contracts, claims and defenses of various breaches of duty, negligence, and fraud, as well as leveraging the power of provisional remedies with the goal of avoiding litigation. His experience includes real estate finance disputes, real property litigation, insurance litigation, partnership disputes, entity ownership disputes, securities fraud, and shareholders disputes.

Charlie has deep experience in the multifamily acquisition strategy for investors known as condominium termination transactions. Charlie has testified in front of multiple committees of the Arizona State Legislature regarding proposed amendments to the condominium termination laws.

Concentrations

•Dispute resolution
•Condominium termination transactions and litigation
•eDiscovery and data management
•Insurance litigation
•Nonprofit corporation law
•Provisional Remedies
•Real estate finance disputes
•Real estate litigation
•Tort litigation
•Trial attorney

Recognition & Leadership

Awards & Accolades

•Listed, The Best Lawyers in America, Commercial Litigation, 2025-2026
•Listed, Super Lawyers magazine, Southwest Super Lawyers, 'Rising Stars,' 2024-2026
•Listed, The Best Lawyers in America, 'Ones to Watch,' Commercial Litigation, 2021-2022

 

Charles E. Markle (Phoenix, Arizona) View website

Reviews for Charles E.

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation 1
    • Real Estate Litigation
  • Commercial Law 1
    • Commercial Litigation

Practice Details

  • Languages
    Spanish
    Conversational
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Representative Matters: Defended the constitutionality of a state statute regulating the gambling industry in federal court, with a published opinion from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirming the district court's denial of a preliminary injunction. Monarch Content Management LLC v. Arizona Department of Gaming, No. 20-15047 (9th Cir. 2020).
    Briefed
    argued a $1.8 million breach of a loan agreement/note case, winning summary judgment, which led to collection on the full judgment amount plus all attorneys' fees.
    Advised several real estate investment clients to achieve condominium terminations, pursuant to the complicated statutory framework of A.R.S. 33-1228,
    litigated
    arbitrated numerous such disputed transactions.
    Argued
    won dismissal in defense of title to real property valued at several million dollars, which was acquired via the client's purchase of the promissory note
    foreclosure of the real property.
    Obtained an injunction against several l
    owners who unlawfully prevented client's access to its federal mining claims.
    The above representations were h
    led by Mr. Markle prior to his joining Greenberg Traurig, LLP.
    Internships: Legislative Extern to Counsel for the Majority, Arizona House of Representatives
    Judicial Extern, Hon. John Gemmill, Arizona Court of Appeals
    Intern, Maricopa County Attorney's Office
  • Additional Links
    https://www.gtlaw.com/en/professionals/m/markle-charles-e

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    Arizona
    U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    Supreme Court of the United States
    Memberships

    Professional & Community Involvement

    •Advisory Board Member, Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation, Arizona Chapter, 2019-Present
    •Board Member, Southwest Autism Research & Resource Center (SARRC), 2022- Present
    •Former Board Member, Gilbert Christian Schools, 2018-2019

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Arizona State University Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law
    J.D.
    cum laude; Blackstone Legal Fellow
    Other Education
    Colorado State University
    B.A.

Email Charles E. Markle

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP has 2750 attorneys at this location.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP was established in 1967.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions