×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Gust Rosenfeld P.L.C.Member
Mr. A. Daniel Coumides
Pro

Mr. A. Daniel Coumides

Not yet reviewed

One E. Washington Street, Suite 1600, Phoenix, AZ 85004-2553

Insurance, Litigation, Health Care Law and 9 more

About Mr. A. Daniel Coumides

Daniel (Dan) Coumides practice is focused on general liability defense, personal injury defense, construction defect litigation, premises liability defense, product liability defense, defamation, medical malpractice defense, and insurance coverage. He has extensive litigation experience. Dan has tried multiple jury trials to reach a verdict, and he has participated in numerous arbitrations and mediations.

During law school, Dan worked as a law clerk for U-Haul International, the Arizona Attorney General’s Office, and the Office of the Public Defender, County of San Diego.

Dan earned his Juris Doctor from the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law. He also received a Bachelor of Science degree in accounting from Arizona State University.

Dan is fluent in Spanish.

Professional Recognition

• Phoenix Magazine 2025 Top Lawyers - Civil Law Litigation

• The Best Lawyers in America: Ones to Watch, Commercial Litigation; Insurance Law; Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants (2021-2025)
• Phoenix Business Journal, Rising Stars in Law (2021)

• Phoenix Magazine 2022 Top Lawyers - Commercial Litigation

 

Mr. A. Daniel Coumides (Phoenix, Arizona) View website

Reviews for Mr. A. Daniel Coumides

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Insurance
  • Litigation
  • Personal Injury 1
    • Wrongful Death
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Premises Liability
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Other 5
    • Health Care Law
    • General Liability
    • Product Liability
    • Construction Defect
    • Insurance Coverage

Practice Details

  • Languages
    Spanish
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Member
    Firm Name
    Gust Rosenfeld P.L.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Cincinnati Indemnity Company v. Southwestern Line Constructors Joint Apprenticeship
    Training Program, 244 Ariz. 546 (App. 2018) (insurance coverage)
    Simonds v. Arizona Aerospace Foundation, Inc., 2018 WL 4055654 (App. 2018) (defamation)
    Scott v. Roman Catholic Church of the Diocese of Phoenix, 2021 WL 871686 (App. 2021) (premises liability)
  • Additional Links
    https://www.gustlaw.com/attorneys/a-daniel-coumides/

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2013, Arizona
    2013, U.S. District Court, Arizona
    Memberships

    Professional Associations

    •State Bar of Arizona
    •Maricopa County Bar Association
    •Arizona Association of Defense Counsel
    •Los Abogados
    •Arizona Hispanic Chamber of Commerce

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law
    Class of 2012
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Arizona State University
    Class of 2009
    B.S.
    Accounting

Contact Mr. A. Daniel Coumides

Member at Gust Rosenfeld P.L.C.
Not yet reviewed

One E. Washington Street, Suite 1600Phoenix, AZ 85004-2553U.S.A.

Show on map
Fax: 602.254.4878

Email Mr. A. Daniel Coumides

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Mr. A. Daniel Coumides was admitted in 2013 to the State of Arizona.
  • Does this attorney speak any other languages?
    Mr. A. Daniel Coumides speaks Spanish.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Gust Rosenfeld P.L.C. has 60 attorneys at this location.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Gust Rosenfeld P.L.C. was established in 1921.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions