About Seth J. Schwartz

A shareholder in the firm’s Casualty Department and recipient of Martindale-Hubbell’s highest AV Preeminent rating, Seth represents construction companies and contractors, trucking companies, bars, commercial property owners and managers, and amusement parks and insurers throughout Pennsylvania. His practice focuses on high-exposure matters involving catastrophic injury or death in the areas of construction accidents and defects, trucking, liquor liability, premises liability, and sports and amusement. An accomplished trial lawyer, Seth has tried numerous jury cases in Philadelphia and across eastern Pennsylvania, securing multiple defense verdicts.

Prior to joining Marshall Dennehey, Seth was a staff trial attorney for seven years at Nationwide Insurance. He handled general defense litigation including automobile liability, construction matters, and premises liability. Before joining Nationwide Insurance, Seth entered private practice at a small civil litigation firm in Philadelphia, where he handled a range of civil litigation from premises liability to complex product liability matters.

Seth was appointed to judge pro tem for the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas and to the Investigative Division of the Philadelphia Bar Association's Commission on Judicial Selection and Retention.

Seth graduated from Temple University School of Law in 1992. He attended college at The American University where he graduated in 1988 with honors.

Honors & Awards

•AV Preeminent by Martindale-Hubbell
•BTI Client Service All-Star (2024)

Classes/Seminars Taught

An Overview of Construction Defect Litigation in Pennsylvania, Nationwide Insurance Company, December 16, 2014
Commercial Defense Practice in New York, New Jersey & Pennsylvania, Nationwide Insurance Company, December 5, 2014
Commercial Defense Practice in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, Nationwide Insurance Company, December 2013
Brief Overview of Pennsylvania Contractual Indemnity and Additional Insured Issues, Nationwide insurance Company, April 2012
•Numerous presentations to property managers and insurance companies regarding effective claims handling and tender issues
•Pennsylvania Amusement Park Association Annual Conference, 2007

Pro Bono

•Christian Legal Clinics of Philadelphia

Results

Consolidated Cases Successfully Transferred to Correct Venue

We successfully transferred two consolidated cases involving alleged falls by construction workers from Philadelphia to Cumberland County. Our clients were located in Lancaster County, and the only codefendant was located in Philadelphia County. We filed preliminary objections as to venue, arguing that the codefendant was a “phantom” defendant named to obtain venue in Philadelphia County. The court was convinced by our arguments. This ruling cuts against the current trend of giving broad deference to plaintiffs on venue issues.

Thought Leadership

Defense Digest

On the Pulse...Construction Injury Litigation Practice Group

December 1, 2023

Recent data released from the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics reveals that construction laborers accounted for 11.9% of all reported fatal falls, slips, or trips in 2020 across all occupations. Sixty percent of all construction laborers perform their work near or around moving mechanical parts or in close proximity to large moving objects. Fifty percent of these workers reportedly make use of PPE. Construction sites are among the most dangerous places to work in the United States. Indeed, in 2020 alone, construction laborers accounted for 8.9% of all workplace deaths due to exposure to harmful substances or environments. With millions of accidents reported each year, injuries to construction workers are often serious or even catastrophic. This type of litigation is fraught with difficulty since it tends to involve sophisticated legal issues, multiple parties, multiple causes of action, complex relationships, and problematic factual situations. The law in this area continues to evolve as existing rules and precedent are continually challenged, overturned, replaced, or modified. Marshall Dennehey’s Construction Injury Litigation Practice Group understands these complex relationships and issues. Our firm has a significant presence in the construction industry in the representation of construction companies/prime contractors, commercial property owners/ managers, developers, design professionals, and demolition, electrical, roofing, and various other trade subcontractors in a wide array of serious loss cases where there is often catastrophic injury or death. With decades of experience, our diverse team of attorneys regularly defends our clients in a multitude of personal injury matters arising out of the construction process. We handle everything from catastrophic injury or death due to contact with objects or equipment, fatal or catastrophic transportation incidents, roofing incidents, and scaffolding/ladder incidents, to the more routine worksite slip and fall incidents. Our defense approach is aimed at the early identification of key issues and is predicated on developing the earliest possible defense strategies tailored to the individual case and client. Our involvement often begins with pre-litigation accident investigation, claims analysis, best practices related to client document and evidence retention, and early assessment of risk/liability transfer opportunities to shift liability and exposure under the terms of a construction contract, including indemnification and additional insured coverage issues. Our diverse team of trial attorneys have significant experience in handling some of the most high-profile and complex construction litigation matters taking place across the United States, and we have proven time and again, that we are ready and able to try even the most challenging construction injury matters to verdict with the skills needed to prevail. The depth of our experience is the key to our legal defense in construction injury matters. Our professionals have considerable breadth of experience in this domain. They understand the evolving and complex laws surrounding this volatile area of practice, including issues relating to insurance coverage and claims disputes, additional insured coverage, product liability, workers’ compensation, the statutory employer doctrine, contractor licensing issues, Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) compliance and workplace safety issues, and the peculiar risk doctrine. Through the use of cutting-edge technology and aggressive claim investigation, we are able to assess liability exposure and potential damages issues early on in a case so, together with the client and insurer, we can effectively resolve the case. Our unique strategy and team approach consists of experienced partners, associates, and paralegals capable of handling the basic, as well as the highly-sophisticated and complex, construction injury litigation matters throughout Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, Ohio, Florida, New York, and Connecticut. We look forward to your inquiries and remain at your disposal for presentations or seminars your company may desire. Defense Digest, Vol. 29, No. 4, December 2023, is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1. 2023 Marshall Dennehey. All Rights Reserved. This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm. For reprints, contact tamontemuro@mdwcg.com.

News

Seth J. Schwartz Named a BTI Consulting Group 2024 Client Service All-Star

June 4, 2024

 

Awards

Reviews for Seth J.

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 7
    • Construction Injury Litigation
    • Architectural, Engineering and Construction Defect Litigation
    • Hospitality and Liquor Liability
    • Trucking & Transportation Liability
    • General Liability
    • Amusements, Sports and Recreation Liability
    • Premises and Retail Liability

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Marshall Dennehey
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Significant Representative Matters: Defense jury verdict in premises liability matter. Seth was the only defense attorney
    Plaintiff had two lawyers during trial. Plaintiff argued spoliation of evidence, had back surgery
    boarded over seven figures in damages. Seth developed inconsistencies during the cross examination of Plaintiff's witnesses,
    argued that Plaintiff failed to meet his burden of proof.
    Defense jury verdict in premises liability matter. Seth again was the only defense attorney
    Plaintiff had two lawyers during trial. Plaintiff argued that the defendant failed to preserve evidence. It is also noted that the defendant had witness issues with a former employee. Plaintiff was a gr
    fatherly gentlemen claiming a serious a hip injury. Seth introduced evidence that there were gaps in Plaintiff's story,
    during Seth's cross examination of Plaintiff's liability expert, the expert admitted that he did not have his entire file, although he initially told the jury he did

    , he acknowledged that the Defendant was compliant with a different set of industry regulations which he omitted to discuss during direct examination.
    Defense jury verdict in automobile rear-end collision with negligence stipulation involving surgery
    significant wage loss claim. Negligence was admitted to the jury. Significant credibility issues developed during the case, including Plaintiff's vocational expert admitting in front of the jury of failing to produce all discoverable documents. After hearing the evidence, jury returned a defense verdict, although negligence was admitted.
    Defense jury verdict in rear-end motor vehicle accident case. Negligence was admitted. Plaintiff alleged surgery
    a significant vocational claim. Numerous inconsistencies were developed during trial involving the Plaintiff's reporting of the incident to the doctor. After deliberation, jury awarded a defense verdict.
    Defense jury verdict in rear-end collision with negligence stipulation involving two personal injury claims of multiple herniations
    permanency. During trial, evidence was developed which revealed that Plaintiffs provided varying medical histories to different doctors. After hearing the evidence, jury returned a defense verdict.
    Defense jury verdict in premises liability case whereby the plaintiff, a pizza delivery person, allegedly fell on ice while delivering a pizza. During trial Plaintiff admitted on cross examination to observing alternative pathways
    that he did not maintain a vigilant look out. The jury returned a defense verdict in favor of the homeowners.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1992, Pennsylvania
    1994, U.S. District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    Memberships

    Associations & Memberships

    •International Amusement & Leisure Defense Association
    •Pennsylvania Amusement Park Association
    •Pennsylvania Bar Association
    •Volunteer Attorney Christian Legal Clinics of Philadelphia

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Temple University Beasley School of Law
    Class of 1992
    J.D.
    Other Education
    American University
    Class of 1988
    B.S.B.A.
    cum laude

Contact Seth J. Schwartz

Share Holder at Marshall Dennehey
5.0
1 review

2000 Market Street, Suite 2300Philadelphia, PA 19103U.S.A.

Show on map
Fax: (215) 575-0856
Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Seth J. Schwartz was admitted in 1992 to the State of Pennsylvania.
  • Is this attorney Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review rated?
    Yes, Seth J. Schwartz has a 5.0 Peer Rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Seth J. Schwartz attended Temple University Beasley School of Law.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Marshall Dennehey was established in 1962.