×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
no photo

Nicolai Andrew Schurko

Not yet reviewed

2001 Market St., Ste. 3000, Philadelphia, PA 19103

Aviation Litigation, Commercial Litigation, Product Liability and 5 more

About Nicolai Andrew Schurko

Nicolai Andrew Schurko is a lawyer practicing aviation litigation, commercial litigation, product liability and 5 other areas of law. Nicolai received a degree from University of Pittsburgh, and has been licensed for 16 years. Nicolai practices at Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P. in Philadelphia, PA.

Reviews for Nicolai

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Aviation Law 1
    • Aviation Litigation
  • Commercial Law 1
    • Commercial Litigation
  • Products Liability 1
    • Product Liability
  • Communications and Media 1
    • Privacy / Data Security
  • Insurance 1
    • General Liability
  • General Practice
  • Intellectual Property
  • Social Security

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Attorney
    Firm Name
    Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Significant Representative Matters: Obtained award in favor of client, a helicopter repair station, at arbitration before the International Chamber of Commerce in case involving a commerical dispute with a forein helicopter operator,
    collected on arbitration award by pursuit of operator in its home country.
    Received defense decision in favor of client, a government entity owning an airport, at arbitration of a premises liability claim involving alleged traumatic brain injuries.
    Represented defendant attorney in a case involving an alleged misappropriation of estate assets,
    obtained a dismissal with prejudice of all claims through dispositive motion practice.
    Obtained dismissal of all claims against client, an entity with an attenuated ownership interest in an apartment building, in a case involving the death of a communications contractor who fell to his death while installing equipment on the roof of the apartment building.
    Successfully confessed judgment against an entity that defaulted on settlement obligations to client, a Part 135 operator under the Federal Aviation Regulations,
    pursued the defaulting entity to a successful resolution in case involving breach of contract arising out of charter flight services provided by client.
    Published Works: A Game Changer for Personal Jurisdiction, Defense Digest, Vol 22, No. 2, June 2016
    Data Breach 101, Defense Digest, December 2010

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2010, Pennsylvania
    2010, New Jersey
    2010, U.S. District Court District of New Jersey
    2011, U.S District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    Memberships

    Associations & Memberships

    •Pennsylvania Bar Association
    •Philadelphia Bar Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Pittsburgh School of Law, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2010
    J.D.
    cum laude

    University of Pittsburgh School of Law, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2010
    J.D.
    2010 Trial Advocacy Award

    University of Pittsburgh School of Law, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2010
    J.D.
    Pittsburgh Tax Review

    University of Pittsburgh School of Law, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2010
    J.D.
    Articles Editor
    Other Education
    University of Pittsburgh
    B.S. in Business Administration

    University of Pittsburgh
    Major: Finance

    University of Pittsburgh
    Minor: Economics

    University of Pittsburgh
    magna cum laude

    University of Pittsburgh
    Class of 2006
    B.S. in Business Administration

    University of Pittsburgh
    Class of 2006
    Major: Finance

    University of Pittsburgh
    Class of 2006
    Minor: Economics

    University of Pittsburgh
    Class of 2006
    magna cum laude

Email Nicolai Andrew Schurko

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions