×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Matthew A. Casey
Pro

Matthew A. Casey

4.6
14 reviews

1650 Market Street, 34th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19103

Catastrophic Injury Litigation, Medical Malpractice, Personal Injury and 35 more

About Matthew A. Casey

Matthew Casey, a founding partner of Ross Feller Casey, LLP, is widely considered one of the nation’s most accomplished personal injury trial attorneys, having achieved record-setting courtroom victories. His practice includes every area of catastrophic injury litigation, including medical malpractice, wrongful death, birth injuries, workplace injuries, and premises and product liability. Since starting the firm in 2006, Casey has obtained nearly 200 verdicts and settlements of at least $1 million. That astonishing legal resume includes more than 40 case recoveries that each topped $10 million, six of them through verdicts.

 

Matthew A. Casey (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) View website

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Matthew A. Casey got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Matthew A.

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
4.6
See All Reviews
14
3.0
Lawyers.com
2
4.9
Martindale
12
Avvo
Not yet reviewed
Showing 1-2 of 2 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
50%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
50%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
3.0
Quality of Service
3.0
Responsiveness
3.0
Value for Money
3.0
Products Liability
Posted by Tyler
January 28, 2026
Hired Attorney

It’s hard to put this in words, but my father found this law firm Ross Feller Casey , after I was damaged by a pharmaceutical companies medicine . All throughout the case communication was very poor. Every time they called us they would throw six figure numbers in front of us. sadly, my father passed five years ago . thank God he didn’t see what happened. after 11 years of 4 months of waiting and after hearing multimillion dollar settlements for years. they offered me $3000. That wouldn’t even cover the surgery that I needed to fix my body. nor the pain of having no friends and the physical and mental abuse that I suffered while on this medicine. One of “the worst law firms that I’ve ever dealt with”. And if you value your family and the future of your loved ones” find another law firm” I wish I would’ve”.

 
Personal Injury
Posted by anonymous
August 27, 2010
Hired Attorney
From the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network

Services

Areas of Law

  • Medical Malpractice 1
    • Failure to Diagnose
  • Personal Injury 1
    • Wrongful Death
  • Products Liability 2
    • Automotive Products Liability
    • Drug and Medical Device Litigation
  • Toxic Torts
  • Seat Belt Injury
  • Other 29
    • Catastrophic Injury Litigation
    • Workplace Injuries
    • Toxic Tort
    • Birth Trauma
    • Brain Injury
    • Medical Liability
    • Medical Negligence
    • Spinal Injury
    • Wrong Site Surgery
    • Surgeons Liability
    • Traumatic Brain Injury
    • Head Injury
    • Catastrophic Injury
    • Neurolaw
    • Plaintiffs Personal Injury
    • Automotive Crashworthiness
    • Automotive Design Liability
    • Automotive Restraints
    • Biomedical Products Liability
    • Chemical Explosions
    • Chemical Products Liability
    • Elevator Liability
    • Escalator Liability
    • Explosions
    • Gas Explosions
    • Heart Device Litigation
    • Product Defects
    • Product Failure
    • Welding Products Liability

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Senior Partner
    Firm Name
    Ross Feller Casey, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Marcus Gustafsson v. Trigen-Philadelphia Energy Corporation et al, Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, June Term, 2006, No. 001182, Legal Intelligencer, February 26, 2008
    Christine Hook, et al v. William Steven Auriemma, M.D., Court of Common Lackawanna County, 02 CV 6190, Legal Intelligencer, March 31, 2006, pp. 1,8
    Caroline Monaghan, et al v. Frankford Hospital, et al, Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, February Term, 2002, No. 1557, Legal Intelligencer, October 12, 2004, pp. 1,6,8
    Estate of Melissa Diehl, et al v. Dr. Sahael Raschid, et al, Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County, No. CV-1.0081-99, Verdict Search Pennsylvania, Volume 1, Issue 1, January, 2006
    Janice Stokes, Executrix of the Estate of David A. Stokes, deceased, v. Lehigh Valley Hospital, et al, Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County, No. 2003-C241V, Morning Call, January 17, 2006, p. B1.
    Transactions

    Matthew Casey is a record-setting, Philadelphia-based attorney with an unmatched reputation for tenacity and determination in the courtroom.

    His remarkable results include:

    $85 million verdict – The largest personal injury verdict in the U.S. that year

    $40.5 million verdict – For a baby who sustained a brain injury from medical malpractice

    $29 million recovery – For a brain-injured child

    $26.5 million recovery – In a medical malpractice, automobile accident case

    $26.3 million recovery – For a man who suffered a spinal cord injury

    $25 million recovery – In an auto product defect case

    $23.1 million verdict – For an amputation caused by medical malpractice

    $22.9 million settlement – In a premises liability case

    $22.5 million recovery – For the failure to treat a brain aneurysm

    $22 million recovery – In the largest bad-faith insurance settlement in Pennsylvania history

    $20 million recovery – For a man who suffered a brain injury

    $19.5 million settlement – In a product defect case involving a workplace injury

    $19.5 million recovery – For a boy with cerebral palsy

    $19.3 million recovery – In a birth injury case involving a placental abruption

    $19.25 million recovery – For neurological injuries in a meningitis case

    $19.25 million recovery – For birth injuries that resulted in cerebral palsy

    $19.1 million verdict – For a man who was struck by a car

  • Additional Links
    https://www.rossfellercasey.com/ https://www.rossfellercasey.com

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1999, Pennsylvania
    2001, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Georgetown University Law Center
    Class of 1999
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Notre Dame
    Class of 1993
    B.A.
    magna cum laude
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1971
    Scranton, Pennsylvania, May 23, 1971

Contact Matthew A. Casey

Senior Partner at Ross Feller Casey, LLP
4.6
14 reviews

One Liberty Place, 1650 Market Street, 34th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103U.S.A.

Show on map
Fax: 215-574-3080

Email Matthew A. Casey

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Matthew A. Casey was admitted in 1999 to the State of Pennsylvania.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Matthew A. Casey is admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Ross Feller Casey, LLP has 23 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Matthew A. Casey attended Georgetown University Law Center.
  • Is this attorney listed in the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers?
    Matthew A. Casey is listed in the Medical Malpractice, Personal Injury, Premises Liability, Product Liability Law and Toxic Torts section of the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions