×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
no photo

Mr. Mark Terence Sheridan

Not yet reviewed

One Independence Square West, Philadelphia, PA 19106

Automobile & Trucking, Construction Law, General Liability and 6 more

About Mr. Mark Terence Sheridan

Mr. Mark Terence Sheridan is a lawyer practicing automobile & trucking, construction law, general liability and 6 other areas of law. Mark received a B.A. degree from Randolph-Macon College, Ashland, Virginia in 1983, and has been licensed for 33 years. Mark practices in Philadelphia, PA.

Awards

Distinguished Peer Rated
This award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 3.0 to 4.4.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer BV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Mr. Mark Terence Sheridan got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Mark

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Construction Law
  • Professional Liability
  • Other 7
    • Automobile & Trucking
    • General Liability
    • Insurance Coverage & Bad Faith
    • Product Liability
    • Bankruptcy & Debt
    • Commercial
    • Environmental and Natural Resources

Practice Details

  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    REPRESENTATIVE MATTERS: Estate of Hoppe v. Front Row Sport Bar
    Grill - Defense verdict in Monroe County on wrongful death, dram shop claim against sports bar.
    Serafini v. John A. Yenason, Inc. - Defense verdict in Lackawanna County on behalf of our heating
    air conditioner installer on negligence
    breach of contract claim in connection with $2 million dollar home.
    Maleski v. Twelve Penny Saloon - Defense verdict in Lackawanna County on behalf of night club where plaintiff suffered serious injuries to her wrist
    forearm from a slip
    fall on the dance floor.
    Albert v. Estate of Lesjack - Defense verdict in Susquehanna County on behalf of building owner arising from slip
    fall accident on ice as the plaintiff was entering her place of employment.
    Guagno v. Shreyer Construction - Defense verdict in Monroe County on behalf of installer of deck which collapsed, injuring the homeowner.
    Hospitality Associates of Tannersville v. Aaron Wright Tech. Services - Summary Judgment granted to commercial property appraiser on grounds that no duty was owed to the lender who provided financing to purchaser of resort property.
    Riley v. Barlow Drywall - Summary Judgment granted to drywall sub-contractor on grounds that no duty was owed to provide fall protection to painting sub-contractor who was seriously injured when he fell off of unprotected second floor l
    ing.
    Grey Fox Plaza v. Williamsport Water Authority - Summary Judgment granted to municipal water authority on grounds that the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act precluded developer's lawsuit for the alleged wrongful location
    design of a water line.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
    Pennsylvania
    1993, North Carolina
    Memberships

    PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS

    •Pennsylvania Bar Association
    •Lackawanna County Bar Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    George Mason University School of Law, Arlington, VA
    Class of 1987
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Randolph-Macon College, Ashland, Virginia
    Class of 1983
    B.A.
    History
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1961
    Charleston, South Carolina, February 11, 1961

Mr. Mark Terence Sheridan

Not yet reviewed

One Independence Square WestPhiladelphia, PA 19106U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Thomas Michael Joachim
Pro
Thomas Michael Joachim
3.1
10
Automobile Accidents lawyer

Free Consultation

215-764-3205
View Profile
Robert Huber
Pro
Robert Huber
5.0
4
Automobile Accidents lawyer

Free Consultation

215-995-1440
View Profile
Kenneth M. Rothweiler, Esquire
Pro
Kenneth M. Rothweiler, Esquire
4.6
1
Automobile Accidents lawyer

Free Consultation

215-610-3297
View Profile
Thomas F. Flynn III
Pro
Thomas F. Flynn III
2.1
4
Automobile Accidents lawyer
833-780-8661
View Profile
Edward A Monsky
Pro
Edward A Monsky
4.3
4
Automobile Accidents lawyer

Free Consultation

570-904-8367
View Profile

Email Mr. Mark Terence Sheridan

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions