×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel LLPPartner
Joseph J. McGovern

Joseph J. McGovern

Not yet reviewed

Centre Square West, 1500 Market Street, Suite 3400, Philadelphia, PA 19102-2101

Litigation, Appellate, Commercial Litigation and 22 more

About Joseph J. McGovern

Joseph J. McGovern is a lawyer practicing litigation, appellate, commercial litigation and 22 other areas of law. Joseph received a B.A. degree from Boston University in 1973, and has been licensed for 49 years. Joseph practices at Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel LLP in Philadelphia, PA.

Joseph J. McGovern (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Joseph J. McGovern got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Joseph

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Construction Law 1
    • Construction Litigation
  • Insurance
  • Intellectual Property
  • Real Estate
  • Other 19
    • Appellate
    • Environmental
    • Business & Finance
    • Corporate
    • Zoning & Land Use
    • Labor & Employment
    • Employment Litigation
    • Employment-Related Agreements
    • Labor Arbitration
    • Government & Public Policy
    • Government Contracting
    • Trusts & Estates
    • Trust & Estate Administration
    • Industry Focus
    • Financial Services
    • Individuals & Private Clients
    • Local Governments & Municipal Authorities
    • Real Estate & Construction
    • Universities & Secondary Schools

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Selected Federal Cases: BRO-TECH Corporation t/a the Purolite Company. v. THERMAX, INC., 2010 WL 147921 (E.D.Pa. 2010)
    BRO-TECH Corporation t/a the Purolite Company. v. THERMAX, INC., 651 F. Supp.2d 378 (E.D.Pa. 2009)
    BRO-TECH Corporation t/a the Purolite Company. v. THERMAX, INC., 2009 WL 737349 (E.D.Pa. 2009)
    In re American Business Financial Services, Inc., 384 B.R. 80 (Bkrtcy.D.Del., March 20, 2008)
    In re American Business Financial Services, Inc., 384 B.R. 66 (Bkrtcy.D.Del., March 20, 2008)
    Miller v. Santilli, 2008 WL 355516 (E.D.Pa., February 07, 2008)
    In re American Business Financial Services, Inc., 375 B.R. 112 (Bkrtcy.D.Del., September 07, 2007)
    Miller v. Santilli, 2007 WL 839981 (E.D.Pa., March 15, 2007)
    In re American Business Financial Services, Inc., 362 B.R. 135 (Bkrtcy.D.Del., February 13, 2007)
    In re American Business Financial Services, Inc., 361 B.R. 747 (Bkrtcy.D.Del., February 13, 2007)
    In re American Business Financial Services, Inc., 360 B.R. 74 (Bkrtcy.D.Del., February 13, 2007)
    Portnoy v. Omnicare Pharm., Inc., No. 02-2905, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12235 (E.D. Pa. June 25, 2004)
    Allianz Ins. Co. v. SSR Realty Advisors, Inc., No. 02-7253, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9585 (E.D. Pa. June 5, 2003)
    Thompson Precision Ball Co. v. PSB Assocs. Liquidating Trust, No. 99 C 6943, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 340 (D.Conn. Jan. 11, 2001)
    Cigna Ins. Co. v. Didimoi Prop. Holdings, 110 F.Supp.2d 259 (D.Del. 2000)
    Keystone Coke Co. v. Pasquale, No. 97-6074, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2591 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 9, 1999)
    Keystone Coke Co. v. Pasquale, No. 97-6074, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2589 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 9, 1999)
    Keystone Coke Co. v. Pasquale, No. 97-6074, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 7, 1999)
    Hyde Athletic Indus., Inc. v. Continental Cas. Co., 969 F.Supp. 289 (E.D. Pa. 1997)
    United States v. Keystone Sanitation Co, No. 1:CV-93-1482, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13651 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 22, 1996)
    United States v. Atlas Minerals
    Chemicals, Inc., No. 91-5118, 1995 WL 510304 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 22, 1995)
    United States v. Atlas Minerals
    Chemicals, Inc., 851 F.Supp. 639 (E.D. Pa. 1994)
    United States v. Keystone Sanitation Co., 885 F.Supp. 672 (E.D. Pa. 1994)
    United States v. Atlas Minerals
    Chemicals, Inc., No. 91-5118, 1993 WL 485561 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 15, 1993)
    United States v. Atlas Minerals
    Chemicals, Inc., No. 91-5118, 1993 WL 406727 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 4, 1993)
    Blount Int'l, Ltd. v. Schuylkill Energy Res. Inc., No. 88-3886, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17366 (E.D. Pa. Dec.17, 1990), aff'd 16 F.3d 402 (3d Cir. 1993)
    Macht v. Skinner, 916 F.2d 13 (D.C. Cir. 1990)
    Macht v. Skinner, 715 F.Supp. 1131 (D.D.C. 1989)
    United States v. Charles George Trucking Co., 823 F.2d 685 (1st Cir.1987)
    United States v. Mattiace Indus. Inc., 73 B.R. 816 (E.D.N.Y. 1987)
    United States v. Charles George Trucking Co., 624 F.Supp.1185 (D.Mass. 1986)
    United States v. Metropolitan Dist. Comm'n, No. 85-0489-MA, 83-1614-MA, 1985 WL 9071 (D.Mass. Sept. 5, 1985)
    Conservation Law Found. of New Engl
    , Inc. v. Clark, 590 F.Supp.1467 (D.Mass. 1984)
    Greenwald v. Olsen, 583 F.Supp. 1002 (D.Mass. 1984)
    Bouchard v. Sec'y of Health
    Human Serv., 583 F.Supp. 944 (D.Mass. 1984)
    Maslauskas v. United States, 583 F.Supp. 349 (D.Mass. 1984)
    Ahern v. U.S. Army Materials
    Mechanics Research Ctr., 580 F.Supp. 1405 (D.Mass. 1984)
    United States v. 125.2 Acres of L
    , 732 F.2d 239 (1st Cir. 1984)
    United States v. 0.37of an Acre of L
    , 577 F.Supp. 236 (D.Mass. 1983)
    9 to 5 Org. for Women Office Workers v. Bd. of Governors of the Fed. Res. System, 721 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1983)
    United States v. 177.5 Acres of L
    , 716 F.2d 78 (1st Cir. 1983)
    United States v. 125.02 Acres of L
    , 707 F.2d 11 (1st Cir. 1983)
    United States v. 176.10 Acres of L
    , 558 F.Supp. 1379 (D.Mass. 1983)
    Fitzpatrick v. Pierce, 553 F.Supp. 167 (D.Mass. 1982)
    9 to 5 Org. of Women Office Workers v. Bd. of Governors of the Fed. Res. System, 551 F.Supp. 1006 (D.Mass. 1982)
    United States v. 125.07 Acres of L
    , 667 F.2d 243 (1st Cir.1981)
    Branning v. United States, 654 F.2d 88 (Cl. Ct. 1981)
    Appeal of Goodrich Engineering Inc., 80-2 BCA P 14780, 1980 WL 2737 (A.S.B.C.A. Oct. 10, 1980)
    Appeal of Brinegar & Fuller Inc., 80-1 BCA P 14334, 1980 WL 2964 (A.S.B.C.A. Feb. 28, 1980)

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1977, Massachusetts
    1977, District of Columbia
    1988, Pennsylvania
    Memberships

    Professional & Civic Activities

    •Programs Vice Chair: American Bar Association's Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources Environmental Transactions and Brownfields Committee (2012-2013)
    •Lecturer: EPA Region II, Environmental Regulation Conference
    •Lecturer: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Environmental Enforcement Section Lecture Series
    •Lecturer: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Attorney General's Advocacy Institute
    •Student Advisor: Trial Advocacy Workshop, Harvard Law School
    •Leader of Explorer Post 912: (Careers in the law), Exploring Division of Philadelphia Council of Boy Scouts of America
    •Board Member: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Bethesda, MD
    •Patient Liaison: Family Support Services, St. Christopher's Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
    •Member: Cystic Fibrosis Patient and Family Advisory Board, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA
    •Cabinet Member: World Affairs Council of Philadelphia

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    New England School of Law
    Class of 1976
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Boston University
    Class of 1973
    B.A.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1951
    November 6, 1951

Email Joseph J. McGovern

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Related Lawyers Near You

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions