About Jonathan Wise

Jonathan Wise is a member of Greenberg Traurig’s Intellectual Property Litigation team. Jon has a wide range of experience advising clients and litigating intellectual property matters in a variety of industries, with deep experience handling pharmaceutical and medical device patent cases. He regularly prepares opinions and provides client counseling on patentability, infringement, and validity issues.

Prior to joining GT, Jon was Associate General Counsel of IP Litigation at a global pharmaceutical company. As in-house counsel, he coordinated and executed patent litigation strategy on dozens of U.S. pharmaceutical patent cases filed under the Hatch-Waxman Act; managed a team of lawyers responsible for generic pharmaceutical patent cases; performed freedom-to-operate and patentability analyses; regularly advised senior management on litigation risks and results; conducted internal training on patent litigation, patentability of inventions, and the U.S. discovery process at company sites around the world; and negotiated many case settlements.

Before serving as in-house counsel, Jon litigated patent cases and counseled clients at an intellectual property boutique in New York City. There, he worked on a wide variety of matters representing brand and generic pharmaceutical companies, as well as companies focused on DVDs, computerized controllers, and medical devices.

Jon has also represented veterans in pro bono cases before the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims to help them obtain their service-connected disability benefits. Additionally, he actively participates in firm-led childhood literacy advancement projects in Philadelphia.

Concentrations

•Patent, trademark, and trade secret litigation
•ANDA Hatch-Waxman litigation
•Medical device patent litigation
•General IP counseling, due diligence, opinions, and inter partesreview proceedings

Recognition & Leadership

Awards & Accolades

•Listed, Patexia, ANDA Litigation Intelligence Top 100, 2024
•Listed, Managing IP Magazine's World IP Handbook and Survey, “Notable Practitioner,” 2021-2023
•Listed, Managing IP Magazine's World IP Handbook and Survey, 'Rising Star - United States,' 2019

 

Reviews for Jonathan

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 2
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Intellectual Property & Technology

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Representative Matters: Pharmacosmos A/S v. Hetero Labs Limited: Representing Hetero in its Paragraph IV challenge to Pharmacosmos' patents in the District of New Jersey relating to a generic version of Cosela .
    Astellas Pharma Inc. v. Annora Pharma Private Limited: Representing Annora in its Paragraph IV challenge to Astellas' patents in the District of Delaware relating to a generic version of Cresemba .
    AbbVie Inc. v. Hetero USA, Inc: Represented Hetero in its Paragraph IV challenge to AbbVie's patents in the District of Delaware relating to a generic version of Rinvoq .
    Nivagen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Representing Amneal in a patent case in the District of Delaware relating to Amneal's ready-to-use potassium phosphates product.
    Allergan, Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC: Represented Amneal in its Paragraph IV challenge to Allergan's patents in the Eastern District of New York relating to a generic version of Lumigan .
    ChemLogix LLC v. Bulk Tainer Logistics North America: Represented ChemLogix in a trademark infringement action in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
    Neurocrine Biosciences Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.: Represented Teva in its Paragraph IV challenge to Neurocrine's patents in the District of Delaware relating to a generic version of Ingrezza .
    Jonathan Berall, M.D., M.P.H. v. Teleflex Medical Incorporated:Representing Teleflex in a medical device case in the Southern District of New York
    the Eastern District of North Carolina.
    Smile Br
    s, Inc. v. Castle Dental, LLC.: Represented Smile Br
    s in a trademark infringement case in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
    CMP Development LLC v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC: Represented Amneal in its Paragraph IV challenge to CMP's patents in the District of Delaware relating to a generic version of Carospir .
    Almirall, LLC v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC: Represented Amneal in its Paragraph IV challenge to Almirall's patents in the District of Delaware relating to a generic version of Aczone Gel, 7.5%.
    Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.: Represented Teva in its Paragraph IV challenge to Keryx's patents in the District of Delaware relating to a generic version of Auryxia .
    Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.: Represented Teva in its Paragraph IV challenge to Collegium's patents in the District of Delaware relating to a generic version of Xtampza .
    Egalet US, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.: Represented Teva in its Paragraph IV challenge to Egalet's patents in the District of Delaware relating to a generic version of Arymo Teva obtained a dismissal of the case with prejudice.
    Vifor Fresenius Medical Care Renal Pharma Ltd. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.: Representing Teva in its Paragraph IV challenge to Vifor's patents in the District of Delaware relating to a generic version of Velphoro .
    Worked with teams to obtain favorable trial
    appellate court decisions in Hatch-Waxman cases involving drug products Actonel, Aloxi, Ampyra, Atelvia, Celebrex, Lovaza, Namenda XR,
    OxyContin .
    Negotiated settlements in Hatch-Waxman cases involving drug products Aubagio, Bunavail, Celebrex, Cubicin, Fazaclo, Folotyn, Lunesta, Namenda XR, Nexium 24hr OTC, Oxycontin, Rozerem, Travatan Z, Viagra, Vytorin, Zetia, Zyvox .
    Served as a member of the team representing Teva in the 2017 LMG Life Sciences Patent Impact Case of the Year (GlaxoSmithKline LLC, et al. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.).
    Litigated patent cases for technology companies specializing in DVDs
    controllers used in cooking ovens.
    Represented disabled veterans in pro-bono cases before the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. (Coderre v. Peak, No. 06-2266
    Schuh v. Gibson, No. 12-3100).
    The above representations were h
    led by Mr. Wise prior to his joining Greenberg Traurig, LLP.
    In-House Experience: Associate General Counsel - IP Litigation, Teva Pharmaceuticals, 2010-2018
    Internship: Legal Intern, Hon. Arthur J. Gajarsa, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • Additional Links

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    Pennsylvania
    New York
    U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of New Hampshire School of Law
    Class of 2005
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Chief Articles Editor, Pierce Law Review

    Temple University Fox School of Business
    M.B.A.

    Pennsylvania State University
    Class of 2002
    B.S.
    Chemical Engineering
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1980
    Allentown, Pennsylvania, June 14, 1980
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:

Attorneys FAQs

  • Is this attorney admitted to the bar in more than one state?
    Yes, Jonathan Wise is admitted to practice in New York and Pennsylvania.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Jonathan Wise is admitted to practice before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP has 2750 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Jonathan Wise attended University of New Hampshire School of Law.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP was established in 1967.