AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Westchester County Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).
Practice Area
Reviews
More Filters
Sort by
Language
Years Established
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Westchester County Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer ... Learn More
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Westchester County Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).

Kuczinski, Vila & Associates, LLP

  • 570 Taxter Road, Suite 275, Elmsford, NY 10523

John M. Voelp

  • 8 John Walsh Blvd., Ste. 411, Peekskill, NY 10566-5333

Glen A. Kurtis, PC Attorney at Law

  • 175 Main St., Ste. 614, White Plains, NY 10601-3105

Your legal solution starts here.

Get professional advice by contacting an attorney today.

ADVERTISEMENT

Lambden and Gardner, P.C.

  • 14 Elm Pl., Rye, NY 10580-2919

William J. Florence Jr., LLP

  • One Park Pl., Ste. 300, Peekskill, NY 10566-3887

Calano & Culhane LLP

  • 14 Mamaroneck Ave., White Plains, NY 10601-3319

Hodges Walsh & Burke, LLP

  • 55 Church Street, Suite 211, White Plains, NY 10601

Lawyers At This Firm

Varvaro, Cotter & Bender

  • 1133 Westchester Avenue, Suite S-325, White Plains, NY 10604-5221

Lawyers At This Firm

Law Offices of Philip Hersh

  • 1011 Park St., Ste. 3, Peekskill, NY 10566

Henry R. Simon

  • 24 Pond Ln., Hastings-On-Hudson, NY 10706

R. A. Plaskett, Esq.

  • 40 Birchwood Lane, Hartsdale, NY 10530-3112

Law Offices of Kristen Renzulli, P.C.

  • 31 Overlook Drive, Chappaqua, NY 10514-2801

Vincent J. Aceste, Esq.

  • 305 Old Tarrytown Rd., White Plains, NY 10603-2864

Martino & Weiss

  • 800 Westchester Ave., Ste. 608 S., Rye Brook, NY 10573

Law Office of Peter D. Hoffman, P.C.

  • 96 Spring Street, South Salem, NY 10590

Gallagher Law Offices PLLC

  • 1 Wolfs Ln., Ste. 314, Pelham, NY 10803

Brodsky & Peck

  • 550 Mamaroneck Ave., Ste. 405, Harrison, NY 10528-1614

Lawyers At This Firm

Ras & Associates, PLLC

  • 2500 Westchester Ave. Ste. 320, Purchase, NY 10577

Paul H. Kean

  • 45 Knollwood Rd., Ste. 5, Elmsford, NY 10523-2822

Joseph S. Gulino, Jr., Esq.

  • 75 South Broadway, 4th Floor, White Plains, NY 10601

Joan Iacono

  • 81 Pondfield Rd., Bronxville, NY 10708

Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan LLP

  • 200 Summit Lake Drive, Valhalla, NY 10595

Lawyers At This Firm

Thomas M. Bona, P.C.

  • 123 Main Street, White Plains, NY 10601-3104

Joanne Blair, Esq.

  • 23 Kenyon Pl., Mount Vernon, NY 10552-3018

Duffy & Staab LLC

  • 2 William Street, Suite 304, White Plains, NY 10601

Jafri Law Firm

  • 50 Evergreen Row, Armonk, NY 10504

Law Office of Aaron G. Baily

  • 2065 Boston Post Rd., 2nd Fl., Larchmont, NY 10538

Law Offices of Christine J. Klein

  • 245 Saw Mill River Road, Suite 106, Hawthorne, NY 10532

Freiberg, Peck & Kang, LLP

  • 200 Business Park Dr., Ste. 202, Armonk, NY 10504

Gallo, Feinstein & Naishtut, LLP

  • 211 S. Ridge St., Rye Brook, NY 10573

Lawyers At This Firm
Ask a Lawyer

Additional Resources

About our Personal Injury Lawyers Ratings

The average lawyer rating is created by peers based on legal expertise, ethical standards, quality of service, and relationship skills. Recommendations are made by real clients.

CLIENT RECOMMENDED
75 %

1235 Client Reviews

PEER REVIEWS
4.6

9758 Peer Reviews

User Resources

Lawyer Resources

Commonly Asked Personal Injury Questions From Users Near You

This information is not legal advice and is not guaranteed to be correct, complete or up-to-date. It is provided for general informational purposes only. If you need legal advice you should consult a licensed attorney in your area.

Should I sue the dealership if in the matter of 5 months, the car is junk and needs a new transmission and a new engine?

Paul L. Whitfield
Answered by attorney Paul L. Whitfield (Unclaimed Profile)
Personal Injury lawyer at Paul Whitfield and Associates P.A.
Your statement is confusing. A 14 year old car usually aint worth much. and is usually sold AS IS you say you had a 30 month warranty. Most dealers don't do that with old cars unless you pay extra for it. so why don't you exercise the warranty?if the 30 months have passed then know that you bought a piece of junk. you had your eyes open. You got a piece of junk. So what is the beef?
Your statement is confusing. A 14 year old car usually aint worth much. and is usually sold AS IS you say you had a 30 month warranty. Most dealers don't do that with old cars unless you pay extra for it. so why don't you exercise the warranty?if the 30 months have passed then know that you bought a piece of junk. you had your eyes open. You got a piece of junk. So what is the beef?
Read More Read Less

Do I have a case after I found a roach in a burger of the most popular burger chain?

default-avatar
Answered by attorney Andrew Tyler Velonis (Unclaimed Profile)
Personal Injury lawyer at Andrew T. Velonis, P.C.
Normally, I reccomend that everyone get a lawyer. However, since you were only mildly sick and did not need a dr, it would not be worth a lawyer's time. See if they offer you $1,500 and if they do, take it.
Normally, I reccomend that everyone get a lawyer. However, since you were only mildly sick and did not need a dr, it would not be worth a lawyer's time. See if they offer you $1,500 and if they do, take it.
Read More Read Less

What does a settlement conference really mean?

default-avatar
Answered by attorney Andrew Tyler Velonis (Unclaimed Profile)
Personal Injury lawyer at Andrew T. Velonis, P.C.
Good questions all. Actually, the phrase "settlement conference" is what it sounds like, the parties get together with the assigned judge to discuss the prospects of settling the case. What happens is a lot of talk between the lawyers and the judge. Very commonly, after some preliminary statements, the judge will send the defendant's lawyers out of the room and talk to the Plaintiff's lawyer and say something like "Okay, what would it really take to settle this case?" Then he will tell the lawyer that he probably will not be able to get that much, but if he could get the defendants up to "X" amount, would he take it. The lawyer will give a vague reply. Then the judge will send the plaintiff's lawyer out of the room and talk to the defendants lawyers and say something like "Okay guys, what can you come up with to settle this matter?" They will give him some number, he will tell them it's not enough, but he will see what he can do. Then he will send the defendants' lawyers out and bring the plaintiff's lawyer in again. He will tell the plaintiff's lawyer that this is a lousy case and they will be lucky to get anything, but maybe he will be able to get them something (say, 2/3) of what they are looking for. Then he will tell the defendant's attorneys that this is a serious case and they better get serious about it because if it goes to a jury they will smack them with an adverse verdict but good, but if they follow his recommendation, he will be able to get them out of it for less. Finally, he will bring both sides back in and tell them to split the difference. So that's what happens. As to how long it takes for the City of New York, sorry, I've never taken a case in NYC. As for trying to get out of the settlement: once there is a settlement, both sides must honor it, that's what settlements are all about. It may just be a matter of scheduling the conference. They may not want to settle, that happens a lot and no one is obligated to settle.
Good questions all. Actually, the phrase "settlement conference" is what it sounds like, the parties get together with the assigned judge to discuss the prospects of settling the case. What happens is a lot of talk between the lawyers and the judge. Very commonly, after some preliminary statements, the judge will send the defendant's lawyers out of the room and talk to the Plaintiff's lawyer and say something like "Okay, what would it really take to settle this case?" Then he will tell the lawyer that he probably will not be able to get that much, but if he could get the defendants up to "X" amount, would he take it. The lawyer will give a vague reply. Then the judge will send the plaintiff's lawyer out of the room and talk to the defendants lawyers and say something like "Okay guys, what can you come up with to settle this matter?" They will give him some number, he will tell them it's not enough, but he will see what he can do. Then he will send the defendants' lawyers out and bring the plaintiff's lawyer in again. He will tell the plaintiff's lawyer that this is a lousy case and they will be lucky to get anything, but maybe he will be able to get them something (say, 2/3) of what they are looking for. Then he will tell the defendant's attorneys that this is a serious case and they better get serious about it because if it goes to a jury they will smack them with an adverse verdict but good, but if they follow his recommendation, he will be able to get them out of it for less. Finally, he will bring both sides back in and tell them to split the difference. So that's what happens. As to how long it takes for the City of New York, sorry, I've never taken a case in NYC. As for trying to get out of the settlement: once there is a settlement, both sides must honor it, that's what settlements are all about. It may just be a matter of scheduling the conference. They may not want to settle, that happens a lot and no one is obligated to settle.
Read More Read Less