AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Richville Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).
Practice Area
Reviews
More Filters
Sort by
Language
Years Established
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Richville Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer ... Learn More
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Richville Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).
  • 608 S. Michigan Ave., Saginaw, MI 48602

  • 5140 State Street, Suite 200, Saginaw, MI 48603-3738

  • 306 5th St., Ste. 306, Bay City, MI 48708

Your legal solution starts here.

Get professional advice by contacting an attorney today.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • 916 Washington Ave., Ste. 301, Bay City, MI 48708

  • 1015 N. Johnson St., Bay City, MI 48708

  • 1001 Center Avenue, Bay City, MI 48708

  • 3570 Sunningdale Dr., N., Saginaw, MI 48604

  • 1002 S. Michigan Ave., Saginaw, MI 48602-1501

  • 814 N. Monroe St., Bay City, MI 48708-5931

  • 817 Washington Ave., Bay City, MI 48708

  • 1813 Court St., Saginaw, MI 48602

  • 429 S. State St., Caro, MI 48723

  • 1840 N. Michigan Ave., Ste. 200, Saginaw, MI 48602

  • 2719 State St., Saginaw, MI 48602

  • 429 North State Street, Suite 200, Caro, MI 48723

  • 1001 Center Avenue, Bay City, MI 48708-5100

Ask a Lawyer

Additional Resources

About our Personal Injury Lawyers Ratings

The average lawyer rating is created by peers based on legal expertise, ethical standards, quality of service, and relationship skills. Recommendations are made by real clients.

CLIENT RECOMMENDED
68 %

128 Client Reviews

PEER REVIEWS
4.4

264 Peer Reviews

Commonly Asked Personal Injury Questions From Users Near You

This information is not legal advice and is not guaranteed to be correct, complete or up-to-date. It is provided for general informational purposes only. If you need legal advice you should consult a licensed attorney in your area.

Does our client have a case against us for allegedly not cleaning her house?

Thomas C. Bulman
Answered by attorney Thomas C. Bulman (Unclaimed Profile)
Personal Injury lawyer at Bulman Law Associates PLLC
If you have any pictures, you will win in court. If she sues, go to court and bring you friend. Don't ignore anything from the court. I'll bet the hoarder won't do anything. Next time, take at least a few cell phone photos to show what a pig sty the place is.
If you have any pictures, you will win in court. If she sues, go to court and bring you friend. Don't ignore anything from the court. I'll bet the hoarder won't do anything. Next time, take at least a few cell phone photos to show what a pig sty the place is.
Read More Read Less

Do I have a legal recourse after surgery was done, excessive amount of bone was removed and it never healed?

default-avatar
Answered by attorney John F Turck (Unclaimed Profile)
Personal Injury lawyer at Blaske and Blaske PLC
It will be tremendously difficult to show that had the sliver of bone been removed on both ends, that the bones would have aligned better and you would have avoided the need for more surgery. You have to keep in mind that the issue of malpractice (whether the doctor acted below the standard of care) is separate from whether you can prove that had you received the appropriate treatment, more likely than not you would have achieved a better result. In other words, it's not enough to prove that the standard of care required the doctor to remove a sliver of bone on both ends (and even that will be a difficult argument to win, because the doctor will say that in his or her judgment, it was most appropriate not to remove a tiny sliver of bone on each end). You must also prove that if the doctor had complied with the standard of care, you would have achieved a significantly better result. You have two years from the date of malpractice to formally assert a claim of medical malpractice in Michigan. If you wish to pursue the matter at all, I urge you to immediately contact a medical malpractice attorney for another opinion.
It will be tremendously difficult to show that had the sliver of bone been removed on both ends, that the bones would have aligned better and you would have avoided the need for more surgery. You have to keep in mind that the issue of malpractice (whether the doctor acted below the standard of care) is separate from whether you can prove that had you received the appropriate treatment, more likely than not you would have achieved a better result. In other words, it's not enough to prove that the standard of care required the doctor to remove a sliver of bone on both ends (and even that will be a difficult argument to win, because the doctor will say that in his or her judgment, it was most appropriate not to remove a tiny sliver of bone on each end). You must also prove that if the doctor had complied with the standard of care, you would have achieved a significantly better result. You have two years from the date of malpractice to formally assert a claim of medical malpractice in Michigan. If you wish to pursue the matter at all, I urge you to immediately contact a medical malpractice attorney for another opinion.
Read More Read Less

What should I do if I’m sued by the drunk driver and the passenger that hit the vehicle I was driving?

default-avatar
Answered by attorney Brett Edward Rosenthal (Unclaimed Profile)
Personal Injury lawyer at Graves Law Offices
Insurance coverage follows the vehicle and as result your friend's carrier, who insured the vehicle, as long as you are driving with your friend's permission you are an insured and if you are being sued as a result of your operation of the vehicle your friend's carrier is obligated to provide you a defense. If there is a traffic collision report which outlines who caused the accident, much less that driver of other vehicle, who apparently is suing you, hard to believe that is claim they will pursue for very long. Would contact your friend's carrier and tender or submit the suit for them to designate counsel to defend you. Under those circumstances, if you are injured at all would pursue your personal injuries against the intoxicated at fault party.
Insurance coverage follows the vehicle and as result your friend's carrier, who insured the vehicle, as long as you are driving with your friend's permission you are an insured and if you are being sued as a result of your operation of the vehicle your friend's carrier is obligated to provide you a defense. If there is a traffic collision report which outlines who caused the accident, much less that driver of other vehicle, who apparently is suing you, hard to believe that is claim they will pursue for very long. Would contact your friend's carrier and tender or submit the suit for them to designate counsel to defend you. Under those circumstances, if you are injured at all would pursue your personal injuries against the intoxicated at fault party.
Read More Read Less