AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
North Avondale Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).
Practice Area
Reviews
More Filters
Sort by
Language
Years Established
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
North Avondale Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer ... Learn More
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
North Avondale Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).
  • 503 N. Main Street, Suite 611, Pueblo, CO 81003+2 locations

  • Law Firm with 4 lawyers3 awards

  • The attorneys of Clawson & Clawson, LLP serve clients in Colorado Springs, Pueblo, Parker and Denver, and we have more than 120 years of combined legal experience.

  • Personal Injury LawyersFamily Law, Workers' Compensation, and 33 more

Matthew C. Clawson
Personal Injury Lawyer
Compare with other firms
  • 616 W. Abriendo Avenue, Pueblo, CO 81004

  • Law Firm with 1 lawyer3 awards

  • Choose a Legal Team With 30+ Years of Experience. We Handle Family Law, Worker's Compensation, Bankruptcy, and More. Call Now.

  • Personal Injury LawyersFamily Law, Adoption, and 30 more

Wesley D. Hassler
Personal Injury Lawyer
Compare with other firms
  • 400 North Main Street, Pueblo, CO 81003+10 locations

  • Law Firm with 23 lawyers3 awards

  • Frank Azar Car & Truck Wreck Lawyers was founded on a single guiding principle: to provide effective legal representation for our clients - so that they can receive full and... Read More

  • Personal Injury LawyersAccidents, Car Accidents, and 9 more

  • Free Consultation

  • Offers Video

Frank Azar
Personal Injury Lawyer
Compare with other firms

Your legal solution starts here.

Get professional advice by contacting an attorney today.

ADVERTISEMENT

Heuser & Heuser LLP

4.5
17 Reviews
  • 332 Broadway Avenue, Pueblo, CO 81004+1 location

  • Law Firm with 8 lawyers2 awards

  • Clear Advice, Better Health, Fair Compensation. Call today for a free consultation

  • Personal Injury LawyersAuto Accidents, Drunk Driving Accident, and 19 more

  • Free Consultation

  • Serving Pueblo, CO

  • Law Firm with 27 lawyers1 award

  • White and Steele, founded in 1953, is one of the most experienced and well-respected litigation firms in Colorado and Wyoming. We are a full-service litigation firm, but our... Read More

  • Personal Injury LawyersTrial Practice, Transportation, and 13 more

  • Serving Pueblo, CO

  • Law Firm with 4 lawyers2 awards

  • Provides high quality legal services in all areas of general civil practice.

  • Personal Injury LawyersAutomobile Accidents And Injuries, Estate Planning, and 5 more

  • Free Consultation

  • 82 Blackburn Ln., Pueblo, CO 81001-1948

  • 1401 Court St., Pueblo, CO 81002-0872

  • 113 W. 12th St., Pueblo, CO 81003

  • 743 W. Abriendo Ave., Pueblo, CO 81004-1559

  • 123 W. 12th St., Pueblo, CO 81003

  • 503 North Main Street, Suite 600, Pueblo, CO 81003

  • 496 W. Spaulding Ave. S., Pueblo, CO 81007

  • 222 S. Union, Pueblo, CO 81003

  • 701 N. Grand Ave., Pueblo, CO 81002

  • 801 N. Grand Ave., Pueblo, CO 81003

  • 332 Broadway Ave., Pueblo, CO 81004

  • 701 Grand Ave., Pueblo, CO 81003-3011

  • 414 West Ninth Street, Pueblo, CO 81003

  • 402 W. 12th St., Pueblo, CO 81003-2815

  • 311 W. 24th St., Pueblo, CO 81003-2470

  • 321 W. 18th St., Pueblo, CO 81003-2602

Ask a Lawyer

Additional Resources

Looking for Personal Injury Lawyers in North Avondale?

Personal injury lawyers represent individuals who have been physically or psychologically harmed by the negligence or wrongdoing of another party. They help victims of accidents seek financial compensation for medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages. Their job is to hold the responsible party accountable and secure a just settlement.

About our Personal Injury Lawyers Ratings

The average lawyer rating is created by peers based on legal expertise, ethical standards, quality of service, and relationship skills. Recommendations are made by real clients.

CLIENT RECOMMENDED
78 %

71 Client Reviews

PEER REVIEWS
4.2

195 Peer Reviews

Commonly Asked Personal Injury Questions From Users Near You

This information is not legal advice and is not guaranteed to be correct, complete or up-to-date. It is provided for general informational purposes only. If you need legal advice you should consult a licensed attorney in your area.

Can I sue the apartment complex if I slipped on ice in the parking lot?

default-avatar
Answered by attorney Jeffrey Lapin (Unclaimed Profile)
Personal Injury lawyer at Lapin Law Offices
You can almost always sue someone for your injuries assuming there is a reasonable basis to believe someone is at fault. However, the more important question is whether you would be successful in your suit. The answer to that question is "maybe" depending on additional information not contained within your Question or the Question Detail. Assuming this fall occurred in privately owned parking lot, the owner may be responsible for your medical bills, lost wages, pain, suffering and other damages. Before the parking lot owner (hereinafter referred to as "Owner") would be responsible for your damages, you must prove they were at fault for your fall. Generally, to prove liability for a fall on ice you must prove all of the following: (1) That the Owner either caused the ice to be in the parking lot, knew of the ice, or, by the exercise of reasonable care, would have discovered the icy parking lot; (2) that the Owner should have realized that the ice involved an unreasonable risk of harm to people walking in the parking lot; (3) that the Owner should have expected that people either: would not discover or realize the danger; or would file to protect themselves against the danger posed by the water; and (4) that the Owner failed to use reasonable care to protect people from the danger posed by the ice. The information necessary to establish these items is not continaned within your Question or Question Detail. The following is a partial list of questions that would need to be answered to determine whether the Owner is at fault based on the items set forth in the prior paragraph: what the weather (temperature; precipitation) for at least the 7 days before your fall; how long had the ice been on the parking lot; did the ice cover the entire parking lot or just parts; had the Owner made any attempts to remove the ice; was the ice "visible" to people walking on it or was it covered by snow or "black ice"); what time did you fall; the lighting conditions of the parking lot; whether you had walked on the same ice you fell on prior to your actual fall; the type of shoes/ boots you were wearing and their tread; how fast you were walking; what were you doing and looking at just prior to your fall. Again, this is just a partial list. In addition, you would have to examine your own actions in determining whether you were 50% or more at fault for your fall. In Nebraska, to recover you must be less than 50% at fault. The main questions as to your own "possible" fault involve: (1) whether you knew about the ice; and (2) how carefully you were walking, which involves your speed and what you might have been carrying; and (3) whether you were watching where you were walking. Again, the information provided does not permit me to determine the likelihood of prevailing in a lawsuit against the parking lot Owner. DISCLAIMER: This response is based on the limited information provided, makes certain assumptions, and assumes that all events took place in Nebraska. In addition, this response is not a substitute for professional legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship, nor is it a solicitation to offer legal advice. If you ignore this warning and convey confidential information in a private message or comment, there is no duty to keep that information confidential or forego representation adverse to your interests. You should seek the advice of a licensed attorney in the appropriate jurisdiction before taking any action that may affect your rights. If you believe you have a claim against someone, you should consult an attorney immediately, otherwise there is a risk that the time allotted to bring your claim may expire.
You can almost always sue someone for your injuries assuming there is a reasonable basis to believe someone is at fault. However, the more important question is whether you would be successful in your suit. The answer to that question is "maybe" depending on additional information not contained within your Question or the Question Detail. Assuming this fall occurred in privately owned parking lot, the owner may be responsible for your medical bills, lost wages, pain, suffering and other damages. Before the parking lot owner (hereinafter referred to as "Owner") would be responsible for your damages, you must prove they were at fault for your fall. Generally, to prove liability for a fall on ice you must prove all of the following: (1) That the Owner either caused the ice to be in the parking lot, knew of the ice, or, by the exercise of reasonable care, would have discovered the icy parking lot; (2) that the Owner should have realized that the ice involved an unreasonable risk of harm to people walking in the parking lot; (3) that the Owner should have expected that people either: would not discover or realize the danger; or would file to protect themselves against the danger posed by the water; and (4) that the Owner failed to use reasonable care to protect people from the danger posed by the ice. The information necessary to establish these items is not continaned within your Question or Question Detail. The following is a partial list of questions that would need to be answered to determine whether the Owner is at fault based on the items set forth in the prior paragraph: what the weather (temperature; precipitation) for at least the 7 days before your fall; how long had the ice been on the parking lot; did the ice cover the entire parking lot or just parts; had the Owner made any attempts to remove the ice; was the ice "visible" to people walking on it or was it covered by snow or "black ice"); what time did you fall; the lighting conditions of the parking lot; whether you had walked on the same ice you fell on prior to your actual fall; the type of shoes/ boots you were wearing and their tread; how fast you were walking; what were you doing and looking at just prior to your fall. Again, this is just a partial list. In addition, you would have to examine your own actions in determining whether you were 50% or more at fault for your fall. In Nebraska, to recover you must be less than 50% at fault. The main questions as to your own "possible" fault involve: (1) whether you knew about the ice; and (2) how carefully you were walking, which involves your speed and what you might have been carrying; and (3) whether you were watching where you were walking. Again, the information provided does not permit me to determine the likelihood of prevailing in a lawsuit against the parking lot Owner. DISCLAIMER: This response is based on the limited information provided, makes certain assumptions, and assumes that all events took place in Nebraska. In addition, this response is not a substitute for professional legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship, nor is it a solicitation to offer legal advice. If you ignore this warning and convey confidential information in a private message or comment, there is no duty to keep that information confidential or forego representation adverse to your interests. You should seek the advice of a licensed attorney in the appropriate jurisdiction before taking any action that may affect your rights. If you believe you have a claim against someone, you should consult an attorney immediately, otherwise there is a risk that the time allotted to bring your claim may expire.
Read More Read Less

How much should I ask for on my slip and fall personal injury case?

Answered by attorney Morris Herbert Lilienthal
Personal Injury lawyer at Martinson & Beason, P.C.
The value of your personal injury case depends upon many factors. First, what jurisdiction or state did the incident occur in. Each state has their own separate laws on the potential liability of the landlord and what types of damages you can recover. Under Alabama law, there is a concept known as contributory negligence, which means that if the jury found you (the plaintiff) at fault at all then you cannot recover anything. However, most states do not subscribe to this theory. Further, based upon my experience with slip and fall cases many states have different sets of laws regarding what the responsibilities of a landlord are as opposed to the responsibilities of a store owner would be to their customers. Further, the particular venue your case is in can affect its value IE what specific court it will be tried in. What are the juries like in that area. It certainly sounds like you have a substantial injury; however, as you can see there are many factors that go into determining the value of a personal injury lawsuit. Without having all the information it is not something I could give a value on. I would recommend you speaking with your personal injury attorney and getting his or her evaluation on your claim and how they arrived at that amount. Best of luck.
The value of your personal injury case depends upon many factors. First, what jurisdiction or state did the incident occur in. Each state has their own separate laws on the potential liability of the landlord and what types of damages you can recover. Under Alabama law, there is a concept known as contributory negligence, which means that if the jury found you (the plaintiff) at fault at all then you cannot recover anything. However, most states do not subscribe to this theory. Further, based upon my experience with slip and fall cases many states have different sets of laws regarding what the responsibilities of a landlord are as opposed to the responsibilities of a store owner would be to their customers. Further, the particular venue your case is in can affect its value IE what specific court it will be tried in. What are the juries like in that area. It certainly sounds like you have a substantial injury; however, as you can see there are many factors that go into determining the value of a personal injury lawsuit. Without having all the information it is not something I could give a value on. I would recommend you speaking with your personal injury attorney and getting his or her evaluation on your claim and how they arrived at that amount. Best of luck.
Read More Read Less

Should we go after the first cars insurance to pay 100 percent or the second car to pay the remaining 25?

default-avatar
Answered by attorney Richard B. Copeland (Unclaimed Profile)
Personal Injury lawyer at Law Offices of Richard Copeland, LLC
You might be able to get the first insurance company to pay for the whole bill, but you would probably have better luck getting the insurance companies to split the bill. It is important to realize the insurance companies may have a valid argument that this was an unavoidable accident that was not the responsibility of either of their insureds, in which case you will recover nothing. I recommend taking what settlement you can get.
You might be able to get the first insurance company to pay for the whole bill, but you would probably have better luck getting the insurance companies to split the bill. It is important to realize the insurance companies may have a valid argument that this was an unavoidable accident that was not the responsibility of either of their insureds, in which case you will recover nothing. I recommend taking what settlement you can get.
Read More Read Less