×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen Professional CorporationPartner
Mark Ludolph

Mark Ludolph

Not yet reviewed

300 Hamilton Boulevard, P.O. Box 6199, Peoria, IL 61601-6199

Construction, Toxic Torts & Asbestos, Business and Commercial Litigation and 3 more

About Mark Ludolph

Mark Ludolph is a lawyer practicing construction, toxic torts & asbestos, business and commercial litigation and 3 other areas of law. Mark received a degree from Eastern Illinois University in 1993, and has been licensed for 29 years. Mark practices at Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen Professional Corporation in Peoria, IL.

Mark Ludolph (Peoria, Illinois)

Awards

Distinguished Peer Rated
This award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 3.0 to 4.4.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer BV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Mark Ludolph got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Mark

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 6
    • Construction
    • Toxic Torts & Asbestos
    • Business and Commercial Litigation
    • Accountant and Realtor Malpractice
    • Creditors' Rights and Bankruptcy
    • Business Organizations & Transactions

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen Professional Corporation
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Significant Cases
    Fritz v. Weather Shield Manufacturing, Inc. Plaintiffs sued our defendant for breach of contract
    breach of warranty regarding windows used in the construction of plaintiffs' home. Plaintiffs sought both replacement costs
    compensatory damages of $60,000. Our defendant's motion to dismiss the breach of contract claim
    claim for compensatory damages based on the limitations of the expressed warranty was granted. At trial, verdict was entered in favor of our defendant on the breach of warranty claim. In Re Estate of Helen Blair Plaintiff sought to have annuity proceeds included in probate estate. Defense verdict.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1997, Illinois
    2013, Missouri
    United States District Court, Central, Southern and Northern Districts of Illinois
    United States Bankruptcy Court, Central, Southern and Northern Districts of Illinois
    Memberships

    Professional Associations

    •Defense Research Institute (Online Community Vice-Chair, Commercial Litigation Committee)
    •Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel
    •Illinois State Bar Association
    •Peoria County Bar Association
    •Bar Association for the Central and Southern Districts of Illinois
    •Bankruptcy Association of Southern Illinois
    •The Missouri Bar Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Other Education
    Eastern Illinois University
    Class of 1993
    Bachelor of Arts

    Eastern Illinois University
    Class of 1993
    Speech Communication

    Eastern Illinois University
    Class of 1993
    summa cum laude

    University of Illinois College of Law
    Class of 1997
    Juris Doctor
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1970
    Kickapoo, Illinois, May 21, 1970

Mark Ludolph

Partner at Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen Professional Corporation
Not yet reviewed

300 Hamilton BoulevardP.O. Box 6199Peoria, IL 61601-6199U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Adam P Chaddock
Pro
Adam P Chaddock
4.6
26
Construction Law lawyer
309-424-4823
View Profile
Jonathan A Stump
Pro
Jonathan A Stump
4.9
18
Construction Law lawyer
309-424-4975
View Profile
Adam J. Zayed
Pro
Adam J. Zayed
5.0
7
Construction Law lawyer

Free Consultation

779-341-2147
View Profile
Peter R Jennetten
Pro
Peter R Jennetten
4.7
21
Construction Law lawyer
309-427-8223
View Profile
Stephen M Buck
Pro
Stephen M Buck
4.5
3
Construction Law lawyer
309-427-8253
View Profile

Email Mark Ludolph

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions