×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
William David Andres
Pro

William David Andres

5.0
8 reviews

809 N 96th Street, Suite 100, Omaha, NE 68114

Workers’ Compensation and Personal Injury

About William David Andres

William Andres began practicing law after graduating from Creighton University School of Law in 2006 and immediately focused his practice on workers’ compensation as well as personal injury law. William has successfully represented injured workers from across the states of Nebraska and Iowa. He has helped countless clients win the battle with insurance companies ensuring their rights are protected.

Professional Associations and Memberships

Nebraska State Bar Association, 2006 - Present

Iowa State Bar Association, 2015 - Present

Omaha Bar Association, 2006 - Present

National Association of Trial Attorneys, 2011 - Present

Nebraska Bar Association Workers’ Compensation Executive Committee , 2014 - 2017

Lead Counsel Rated Attorney , 2013 - Present

Dan Jewell Institute Work Comp Committee Member 2025 to the present

 

William David Andres (Omaha, Nebraska) View website

Reviews for William

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
5.0
See All Reviews
8
Lawyers.com
Not yet reviewed
Martindale
Not yet reviewed
5.0
Avvo
8

Services

Areas of Law

  • Personal Injury
  • Other 1
    • Workers’ Compensation

Practice Details

  • Languages
    English
  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
    Contingency Fee: 33% - 40%
    Accepted Credit Cards
    Other
  • Video Calls
    Offers Video Calls
    Video Call Options
    Zoom
    Google Hangouts
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Andres Law Offices, PC LLO
    Firm Name
    Andres Law Offices, PC LLO
  • Additional Links
    https://www.omahaworkinjury.com/About/William-D-Andres.html

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2006, Nebraska
    2006, U.S. District Court District of Nebraska
    2014, Iowa
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Creighton University School of Law
    Class of 2006
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Iowa State University
    Class of 2002
    B.S.
    Business Management

Activity

Email William David Andres

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    William David Andres was admitted in 2006 to the State of Nebraska.
  • Is this attorney admitted to the bar in more than one state?
    Yes, William David Andres is admitted to practice in Iowa and Nebraska.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    William David Andres is admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    William David Andres attended Creighton University School of Law.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions

Avvo Client Reviews

Ratings and reviews are feedback from people who have either consulted an attorney about an issue (but may not have hired the attorney) or people who hired an attorney as a current or former client and provided their feedback to our sister site, Avvo.com.