×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Johnson & Mock, PC, LLOAttorney
Michael J. Tasset

Michael J. Tasset

5.0
1 review

Oakland, NE, U.S.A.

Alcoholic Beverage Law, Alcoholic Beverage Control, Liquor Liability and 81 more

About Michael J. Tasset

Michael J. Tasset is a lawyer practicing alcoholic beverage law, alcoholic beverage control, liquor liability and 81 other areas of law. Michael received a B.A. degree from University of Nebraska-Lincoln in 1991, and has been licensed for 31 years. Michael practices at Johnson & Mock, PC, LLO in Oakland, NE.

Michael J. Tasset (Oakland, Nebraska)

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed
Distinguished Peer Rated
This award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 3.0 to 4.4.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer BV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Michael J. Tasset got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Michael

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
5.0
See All Reviews
1
5.0
Lawyers.com
1
4.4
Martindale
3
Avvo
Not yet reviewed
Showing 1-1 of 1 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
100%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
100%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Value for Money
5.0
Automobile Accidents
Posted by anonymous
July 06, 2018
Hired Attorney

This is one of my favorite Lawyers. Hes very respectful an is very honest an open. Keeps u up to date. Try him for your self. You will like him

Divorce
Posted by Dana
October 20, 2021
Hired Attorney

Working with this lawyer was confusing to say tge least. He was my atty. For two weeks, sick for five days, never returned calls for the next qeek then out of tge blue calked me and said he was quitting. He'd refund me what he didnt use , last I heard two weeks ago I was going to get 100. Of the 2500. Retainer fee!!! He did absolutely nothing on my behalf. I needed protection from my husband! He did not even prepare for that hearing or show up he was more interested in the divorce part th at was going to make him more money

 
From the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network

Services

Areas of Law

  • Alcoholic Beverages 2
    • Liquor Liability
    • Liquor Licensing
  • Agricultural Law
  • Appellate Practice
  • Business Law 1
    • Business Litigation
  • Family Law 1
    • Child Support
  • Technology and Science 1
    • Computers and Software
  • Constitutional Law
  • Construction Law 4
    • Construction Accidents
    • Construction Defects
    • Construction Litigation
    • Mechanics Liens
  • Consumer Law 1
    • Consumer Fraud
  • Contracts 1
    • Breach of Contract
  • Corporate Law 1
    • Corporate Litigation
  • Products Liability 1
    • Food Products Liability
  • Toxic Torts
  • Other 62
    • Alcoholic Beverage Law
    • Alcoholic Beverage Control
    • Aerial Chemical Application
    • Agribusiness
    • Crop Damage
    • Civil Appeals
    • Business Crimes
    • Business Dissolutions
    • Business Fraud
    • Business Organization
    • Children
    • Adoption Law
    • Federal Civil Practice
    • Public Interest Law
    • Bribery
    • Computer Crime
    • Computer Fraud
    • Fifth Amendment Law
    • First Amendment Law
    • Fourth Amendment Law
    • Freedom of Information
    • Media and First Amendment
    • Construction Claims
    • Construction Products Liability
    • Construction Safety
    • Materialmens Liens
    • Consumer Litigation
    • Consumer Protection
    • Consumer Rights
    • Commercial Contracts
    • Contract Fraud
    • Contract Litigation
    • Closely Held Corporations
    • Corporate Criminal Law
    • Corporate Investigations
    • Entertainment and the Arts
    • Matrimonial Bankruptcy Law
    • Separation Agreements
    • Labor Arbitration
    • Land Reclamation
    • Neurolaw
    • Personal Injury Defense
    • Transfusion Associated AIDS
    • Unintended Acceleration
    • Privacy Litigation
    • Elevator Liability
    • Engineering Products Liability
    • Environmental Products Liability
    • Escalator Liability
    • Flammable Fabrics
    • Food Borne Disease
    • Gas Explosions
    • Heart Device Litigation
    • Heavy Equipment Products Liability
    • Industrial Products Liability
    • Manufacturers Liability
    • Motorcycle Products Liability
    • Office Equipment Products Liability
    • Tire Defect Litigation
    • Tire/Rim Mismatch
    • Vehicle Rollovers
    • Federal Practice

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Attorney
    Firm Name
    Johnson & Mock, PC, LLO
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    United States vs. Angelina Alford, Case No. 8:05-CR73 (Cocaine load suppressed by federal trial court)
    United States vs. Rufino Villarreal, Case No. 8:07CR69 (Complete acquittal in federal mail fraud/money laundering case)
    United States vs. Virginia Ramirez-Melendez, Case No. 8:09CR14 (200 pound cocaine seizure
    federal case dismissed)
    United States vs, Shannon Williams, Case No. 8:09CR457 (Massive federal drug conspiracy prosecution)
    In re 3628 V Street, 262 Neb. 77, 628 N.W.2d 272, 29 Media L. Rep. 2117 (2001) (Novel challenge to sealing of search warrant)
    State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. Krepela, 259 Neb. 395, 610 N.W.2d 1 (2000) (Successful defense of County Judge)
    Truman v. Truman, 256 Neb. 628, 591 N.W.2d 81 (1999)(Huge child support arrearage vacated)

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1995, Nebraska State Bar Association
    1995, Nebraska State Courts
    1995, United States District Court
    1995, 8th Circuit Court of Appeals
    Memberships
    Nebraska State Bar Association, 1995
    Nebraska State Courts, 1995
    United States District Courts, 1995
    8th Circuit Court of Appeals, 1995

    Nebraska Criminal Defense Attorneys Association
    1996 to Present
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Nebraska College of Law
    Class of 1995
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Nebraska-Lincoln
    Class of 1991
    B.A.
    English

Email Michael J. Tasset

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Related Lawyers Near You

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions