×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Johnson & Mock, PC, LLOManaging Partner
Clarence E. Mock

Clarence E. Mock

Not yet reviewed

Oakland, NE, U.S.A. + 1 location

Criminal Law, Personal Injury, Litigation and 108 more

About Clarence E. Mock

Clarence E. Mock is a lawyer practicing criminal law, personal injury, litigation and 108 other areas of law. Clarence received a B.S. degree from University of Nebraska-Lincoln in 1974, and has been licensed for 49 years. Clarence practices at Johnson & Mock, PC, LLO in Oakland, NE and 1 other location.

Clarence E. Mock (Oakland, Nebraska)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Clarence E. Mock got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Clarence

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law 2
    • Death Penalty
    • Theft
  • Personal Injury 1
    • Nursing Home Litigation
  • Litigation 2
    • Civil Litigation
    • Complex Litigation
  • General Practice
  • Business Law 1
    • Limited Liability Company Law
  • Real Estate 1
    • Commercial Real Estate
  • Eminent Domain
  • Domestic Partnerships
  • Legal Separation
  • Finance
  • Qui Tam Litigation
  • Government Contracts
  • Indians and Native Populations
  • Insurance 1
    • Insurance Bad Faith
  • Property Damage
  • Law Enforcement
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Regulatory Law
  • Taxation
  • Torts
  • Transportation
  • Workers Compensation
  • Other 84
    • Agricultural Tort Claims
    • Deceptive Trade Practices
    • Apellate Practice
    • Civil
    • Bankruptcy Fraud
    • Business Fraud
    • Children
    • Commercial Fraud
    • Commercial Real Estate Litigation
    • Corporate Criminal Law
    • Assault and Battery
    • Civil Forfeiture
    • Criminal Forfeiture
    • Criminal Investigation
    • Electronic Surveillance
    • Extradition
    • Forensic Medicine
    • Forensic Science
    • Drug Forfeiture
    • Drug Trafficking
    • Condemnation
    • Inverse Condemnation
    • Clean Air Act
    • Clean Water Act
    • Environmental Contamination
    • Environmental Litigation
    • Hazardous Waste Liability
    • Equitable Distribution
    • Marital Property Distribution
    • Marital Property Law
    • Matrimonial Law
    • Separation Agreements
    • Financial Fraud
    • Fraud and Deceit
    • Civil Fraud
    • Fraud
    • County Liability
    • Government Investigations
    • Government Tort Liability
    • Political Subdivision Liability
    • Government Contract Fraud
    • Nursing Home Liability
    • Physicians Licensing
    • Insurance Coverage
    • Insurance Fraud
    • Property Loss
    • Uninsured and Underinsured Motorists
    • Investment Law
    • Investment Fraud
    • Excessive Use of Force
    • High Speed Police Pursuit Litigation
    • Law Enforcement Liability
    • Police Brutality
    • Legal Malpractice Defense
    • Legal Negligence
    • Legal Professional Liability
    • Federal Civil Litigation
    • Partnership Dissolution
    • Aquatic Injuries
    • Automobile Negligence
    • Psychological Injury
    • Spinal Injury
    • Inadequate Security
    • Ancillary Probate
    • Clergy Sexual Misconduct
    • Professional Discipline
    • Professional Negligence
    • Professional Sexual Misconduct
    • Railroad Law
    • Railroad Crossing Accidents
    • Regulatory Agency Practice
    • Regulatory Investigations
    • Securities Law
    • SEC Enforcement
    • Tax Evasion
    • Tax Fraud
    • Civil Liability
    • Intentional Torts
    • Estate Administration
    • Estate Planning for Unmarried Couples
    • Fiduciary Litigation
    • Living Trusts
    • Trust Administration
    • Trust Litigation

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Managing Partner
    Firm Name
    Johnson & Mock, PC, LLO

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1977, Nebraska
    1977, U.S. District Court, District of Nebraska
    1989, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    Memberships
    Nebraska State Bar Association, 1977
    United States District Court for the District of Nebraska, 1977
    United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 1989 Fellow: Fellow, American College of Trial Lawyers

    Board Certified
    Criminal Trial Advocate
    Civil Trial Advocate
    2000-2010

    Nebraska Criminal Defense Attorneys Association
    Board of Directors – 1990-2004
    President – 2003-2004

    Nebraska Association of Trial Attorneys
    Board of Directors – 1990-2006
    President – 2005-2006

    National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
    1989 to Present

    American Association for Justice
    1981 to Present
    Bar Fellowship
    Fellow, American College of Trial Lawyers

    Board Certified
    Criminal Trial Advocate
    Civil Trial Advocate
    2000-2010

    Nebraska Criminal Defense Attorneys Association
    Board of Directors – 1990-2004
    President – 2003-2004

    Nebraska Association of Trial Attorneys
    Board of Directors – 1990-2006
    President – 2005-2006

    National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
    1989 to Present

    American Association for Justice
    1981 to Present
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Nebraska College of Law
    Class of 1977
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Nebraska-Lincoln
    Class of 1974
    B.S.
    Legal Certifications
    Certified as a Criminal Trial Advocacy and Civil Trial Advocacy Specialist by the National Board of Trial Advocacy
  • Personal Details & History
    Hobbies & Interests
    President, Donald E. Nielsen Foundation, Inc.(The Donald E. Nielsen Foundation encourages personal achievement, service to the community and a just society through distribution of grants to worthy applicants.)

Email Clarence E. Mock

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Related Lawyers Near You

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions