×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Burton Employment LawMember
Jocelyn Burton

Jocelyn Burton

Not yet reviewed

1939 Harrison Street, Suite 400, Oakland, CA 94612-9543

Affirmative Action, Age Discrimination in Employment, Americans with Disabilities Act and 57 more

About Jocelyn Burton

Jocelyn Burton is a lawyer practicing affirmative action, age discrimination in employment, americans with disabilities act and 57 other areas of law. Jocelyn received a B.A. degree from Wake Forest University in 1980, and has been licensed for 37 years. Jocelyn practices at Burton Employment Law in Oakland, CA.

Jocelyn Burton (Oakland, California)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Jocelyn Burton got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Jocelyn Burton

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Affirmative Action
  • Labor and Employment 8
    • Americans with Disabilities Act
    • Employment Contracts
    • Family and Medical Leave Act
    • Human Resources Law
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Wage and Hour Law
    • Whistleblower Litigation
    • Wrongful Termination
  • Harassment
  • Other 50
    • Age Discrimination in Employment
    • Child Labor Law
    • Confidentiality Agreements
    • Covenants Not To Compete
    • Employee Discipline
    • Employee Drug Testing
    • Employee Privacy
    • Employee Rights
    • Employer Intentional Torts
    • Employer Liability
    • Employer Rights
    • Employment Arbitration
    • Employment at Will
    • Employment Breach of Contract
    • Employment Civil Rights
    • Employment Claims
    • Employment Class Actions
    • Employment Defense
    • Employment Disability Discrimination
    • Employment Discrimination
    • Employment Law
    • Employment Litigation
    • Employment Practices Liability Insurance
    • Employment Rights
    • Employment Termination
    • Equal Employment Opportunity Law
    • Executive Employment Law
    • Executive Severance Contracts
    • Fair Employment Practices
    • Fair Labor Standards
    • Federal Employment Law
    • Management Employment Law
    • Minimum Wage Law
    • National Origin Discrimination
    • Negligent Hiring
    • Noncompete Litigation
    • Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation Agreements
    • Personnel Policies
    • Personnel Training
    • Prevailing Wage Litigation
    • Public Sector Employment Law
    • Reductions in Force
    • Restrictive Covenants
    • Retaliatory Discharge
    • Title VII Discrimination
    • Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
    • Wage and Hour Class Actions
    • WARN Act
    • Workplace Violence
    • Wrongful Termination Defense

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
    Accepted Credit Cards
    American Express
    Discover
    MasterCard
    Visa
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Member
    Firm Name
    Burton Employment Law
    Firm Onwership
    Minority Owned
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Loritz v. U.S. Court of Appeals for Ninth Circuit, 382 F.3d 999 (9th Cir. 2004)
    Public Citizen v. Department of Transportation, 378 F.3d 958 (9th Cir. 2004)
    Gadda v. Ashcroft, 377 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2004)
    Erlin v. United States, 364 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 2004)
    Gadda v. Ashcroft, 363 F.3d 861 (9th Cir. 2004)
    Taniguchi v. Schultz, 332 F.3d 1205 (9th Cir. 2003)
    Community Hosp. Of Monterey Peninsula v. Thompson, 323 F.3d 782 (9th Cir. 2003)
    Fiduccia v. U.S. Department of Justice, 185 F.3d 1035 (9th Cir. 1999)
    Girard v. Rubin, 62 F.3d 1244 (9th Cir. 1995)
    321 Studios v. Metro Goldwyn Mayer Studios, Inc., 307 F.Supp.2d 1084 (N.D. Cal. 2004)
    Hearn v. Barnhart, 262 F.Supp.2d 1033 (N.D. Cal. 2003)
    Barahona-Gomez v. Ashcroft, 243 F.Supp.2d 1029 (N.D. Cal. 2002)
    Ritchie v. U.S., 210 F.Supp.2d 1120 (N.D. Cal. 2002)
    Quarles v. Barnhart, 178 F.Supp.2d 1089 (N.D. Cal. 2001)
    Buchanan v. U.S. Dept. of Health
    Human Services, 177 F.Supp.2d 1005 (N.D. Cal. 2001)
    Coletta v. Massanari, 163 F.Supp.2d 1101 (N.D. Cal. 2001)
    Moore v. Halter, 168 F.Supp.2d 1137 (N.D. Cal. 2001)
    Sewald v. Pyatt & Silvestri, Chtd., 161 F.Supp.2d 1074 (N.D. Cal. 2001)
    Schmier v. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 136 F.Supp.2d 1048 (N.D. Cal. 2001)
    Johnson v. Reno, 92 F.Supp.2d 993 (N.D. Cal. 2000)
    Noel v. U.S., 893 F.Supp. 1410 (N.D. Cal. 1995).

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1988, California
    2006, North Carolina
    Memberships
    North Carolina State Bar
    State Bar of California
    California Employment Lawyers Association
    Earl Warren Inn of Court
    American Bar Association
    Alameda County Bar Association.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Chicago
    Class of 1988
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Wake Forest University
    Class of 1980
    B.A.
    History

    University of Texas at Austin
    Class of 1983
    M.P.A.
    Public Policy

Email Jocelyn Burton

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions