The Law Office of Crystal R. Villasenor, PLLC

Judge Villasenor is enforcing referee defaults without the consent of the parties and without ever ordering the hearing that would test jurisdiction. That is not neutrality — it is abdication of judicial duty. Under New York law, a referee cannot decide dispositive issues without the consent of the parties (see CPLR § 4317). Any “default” entered by a referee without consent is a nullity. The judge’s role is to review, not rubber‑stamp. By enforcing those defaults as Exhibit A – Blank fraudulent affidavit of service (no proof, no jurisdiction). • Exhibit B – Ryan’s post‑hoc fraudulent SMS “service” filing, falsely claiming Schieninger is judge (record corruption). • Exhibit C – Unverified, unsworn petition with false claims, not notarized or affirmed (no valid pleading). These are distinct but connected defects: • Blank affidavit = jurisdiction never attached. • Ryan’s fraud = corruption of the record after the fact. • Unverified petition = no lawful case to adjudicate.