×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, P.C.Counsel
Janine Westmark Hodgson
Pro

Janine Westmark Hodgson

Not yet reviewed

195 Church Street, 13th Floor, New Haven, CT 06510

Employment Law, Labor Law, Medical Malpractice Defense and 1 more

About Janine Westmark Hodgson

Janine Hodgson has devoted her career to civil defense litigation, representing individual and institutional health care providers in medical malpractice and general liability claims, and Department of Public Health investigations. She has successfully tried numerous jury and bench trials to conclusion in Connecticut Superior Courts. Attorney Hodgson has also successfully briefed and argued cases before the Connecticut Supreme and Appellate Courts. Attorney Hodgson’s experience includes representing professionals in civil matters and grievances and representing employers and municipalities in discrimination and wrongful termination claims in Connecticut Federal District and Superior Courts. She prepares cases for trial with an eye for detail and with the goal of a swift and practical resolution at all stages of litigation.

 

Janine Westmark Hodgson (New Haven, Connecticut) View website

Reviews for Janine Westmark Hodgson

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 4
    • Employment Law
    • Labor Law
    • Medical Malpractice Defense
    • Professional Malpractice

Practice Details

  • Languages
    English
  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
    Accepted Credit Cards
    American Express
    Discover
    MasterCard
    Other - Cash
    Check
    Wire
    Online credit card payment
    Visa
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Counsel
    Firm Name
    Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, P.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Goodman v. Norwalk Hospital, (2nd Cir. 2017) (granting Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss federal RICO
    42 U.S.C. Sec. 1985(3) claims with prejudice)
    Coble v. Bridgeport Board of Education, (granting summary judgment
    motion for special finding in case filed under accidental failure of suit
    plaintiff’s prior action failed due to inexcusable neglect of counsel), aff’d, (Conn.App 2014) (sanctions imposed,
    appeal dismissed as frivolous), aff’d, Miller v. Appellate Court, (Conn. 2016)
    Davis v. Norwalk Economic Opportunity Now, Inc., (2nd Cir. 2013) (affirming dismissal of False Claims Act claim as duplicative of prior Title VII action)
    Plante v. Charlotte Hungerford Hospital, (Conn. 2011) (affirming dismissal of medical malpractice action for failure to file good faith certificate from similar health care provider)
    Lohnes v. Hospital of St. Raphael, (Conn.App. 2011) (affirming dismissal of medical malpractice action for failure to file good faith certificate from similar health care provider)
  • Additional Links
    https://npmlaw.com/attorney/janine-hodgson/

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1986, Connecticut
    U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut
    Memberships
    Connecticut Defense Lawyers Association
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Bridgeport School of Law
    Class of 1986
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Rhode Island
    Class of 1983
    B.A.
    Economics

Contact Janine Westmark Hodgson

Counsel at Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, P.C.
Not yet reviewed

195 Church Street, 13th FloorNew Haven, CT 06510U.S.A.

Show on map
Fax: (203) 821-2009
Office Hours:
  • Monday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Tuesday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Wednesday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Thursday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Friday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM

Activity

Email Janine Westmark Hodgson

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Janine Westmark Hodgson was admitted in 1986 to the State of Connecticut.
  • Does this attorney maintain a professional presence on any social networks?
    Yes, Janine Westmark Hodgson has a professional profile on LinkedIn, Twitter and facebook.
  • Does this attorney offer any legal services for a flat fee?
    Yes, Janine Westmark Hodgson offers fixed fees for certain legal services.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, P.C. has 40 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Janine Westmark Hodgson attended University of Bridgeport School of Law.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions