×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Fox Rothschild LLPPartner
no photo

Marc Jonathan Gross

5.0
1 review

49 Market Street, Morristown, NJ 07960-5122

Litigation

About Marc Jonathan Gross

Marc Jonathan Gross is a lawyer practicing litigation. Marc received a B.A. degree from George Washington University in 1988, and has been licensed for 35 years. Marc practices at Fox Rothschild LLP in Morristown, NJ.

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed
Peer Reviewed Rated
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by another attorney.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer PR

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Marc

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
5.0
See All Reviews
1
5.0
Lawyers.com
1
4.0
Martindale
1
Avvo
Not yet reviewed
Showing 1-1 of 1 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
100%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
0%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Value for Money
5.0
Corporate Law
Posted by anonymous
February 22, 2017
Hired Attorney

We consult Mr. Gross regularly on business and litigation issues. Mr. Gross is a fantastic resource. His creativity and attitude in the approach to problem solving make him a powerful advocate. I would recommend him to any company looking for excellent legal advice.

From the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    *** Lead counsel for nearly 40 franchised gasoline station owners in crisis, who were threatened with franchise termination. Successfully obtained an injunction to restrain one of the world's largest petroleum companies from terminating all of its franchise owners in New Jersey *** Representation of a New York media company in multi-million dollar "bet the company" litigation in New York federal court *** Representation of a putative nationwide class of investors against a multi-national investment firm seeking damages in excess of $75.0 million *** Lead counsel for a national cosmetics manufacturer in trademark litigation
    obtained registration
    use of disputed trademark on motion without trial *** Lead counsel for a venture firm in suit relating to the firm's sale of its radio station for $54 million dollars, obtaining dismissal of all claims on motion in the trial court
    affirmed on appeal *** Representation of a real estate developer in the trial court
    on appeal, obtaining dismissal of an action that sought to rescind a sale involving more than 400 single family homes *** Lead counsel for nationally renowned consulting firm
    its majority shareholders, defending against claims of shareholder oppression
    employment discrimination in litigation brought in federal
    state court by dissenting shareholders. Obtained dismissal of all claims after three week jury trial *** Lead trial counsel on behalf of a telecommunications firm in a suit filed by its former chairman
    l
    lord, seeking more than $1.0 million in damages. Obtained successful jury verdict after extended trial *** Defense of General Partner/Executor of family business in estate litigation filed by family members seeking multi-million dollar recovery. Settled the matter after three weeks of trial with the General Partner/Executor receiving settlement sums in excess of $300,000 *** Representation of an automobile distributor in a suit filed by a dealer to restrain the opening of an additional dealership within 8 miles. Obtained a successful settlement after 2 weeks of trial *** Representation of a property owner in a condemnation proceeding, which avoided the taking of real property
    obtained an award of attorneys' fees in excess of $300,000. *** Representation of a multi-million dollar ATM distributor
    processor in a successful suit to restrain competition by the former sales manager through enforcement of post-employment restrictive covenant. Obtained an injunction against the sales manager on an expedited basis without trial *** Representation of 50% shareholder
    garment manufacturer in crisis to restrain the other 50% shareholder from directing corporate activities. Succeeded in obtaining an injunction to restrain the activities of the other shareholder by obtaining corporate control of the entity.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1992, New York
    U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
    U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
    1991, New Jersey
    U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey
    1999, U.S. Supreme Court
    2002, U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    2009, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Memberships
    - President, Essex County Bar Association (2007 – 2008)
    - Chair, New Jersey State Bar Association Federal Practice and Procedure Section (2009-2010)
    - President and founding member, North Jersey Business Council
    - Former member, Board of Directors, Greater Newark Conservancy (1999 – 2003)
    - Founder and Chairman of the Board of Trustees, Parkinson's Heroes, Inc.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    George Washington University Law School
    Class of 1991
    J.D.
    Other Education
    George Washington University
    Class of 1988
    B.A.
    cum laude
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1966
    Brooklyn, New York, November 3, 1966

Email Marc Jonathan Gross

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions