×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Woods LLPPartner
Sébastien Richemont

Sébastien Richemont

Not yet reviewed

Suite 1700, Montreal, QC H3A 3H3

Civil Litigation, Commercial Litigation, Corporate Litigation and 3 more

About Sébastien Richemont

Sébastien Richemont is a lawyer practicing civil litigation, commercial litigation, corporate litigation and 3 other areas of law. Sébastien has been licensed for 29 years. Sébastien practices at Woods LLP in Montreal, QC.

Sébastien Richemont (Montreal, Quebec)

Reviews for Sébastien

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation 1
    • Civil Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corporate Law 1
    • Corporate Litigation
  • Class Actions
  • Other 2
    • Shareholder Disputes
    • Franchise Litigation

Practice Details

  • Languages
    English
    French
  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Woods LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative M
    ates: Representing Eolectric, a wind energy prospector, in a suit to recover a $3.5 million success fee from Kruger Energy further to the award of a power purchase agreement for the development of the St-Remi wind farm project. The case is under advisement.
    Successfully represented Dr. Garrel before the Court of Appeal of Quebec, which upheld the decision of Justice Tingley in the matter Gestion Finance Tamalia inc. v. Garrel whereby we obtained the dismissal of a defamation suit of more than $7 million against our client.
    Representing CI Investments in a major security class action alleging improper supervision of market timing operations.
    Representing Manulife in a major security class action alleging improper disclosure to the stock market
    shareholders pertaining to risks related to its capital-guaranteed products..
    Obtained the annulment of the Quebec provincial transport ministry decision to disqualify Genivar-Dessau from a $70 million construction project. Following this decision, Genivar-Dessau obtained the contract for realization of plans
    specifications
    site supervision.
    Obtained the dismissal of a declinatory exception in favour of the CCI
    an arbitration request before the CCI in an action for several million dollars pertaining to manufacturer's liability for the benefit of our client Bombardier.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1997, Québec
    Memberships

    PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES AND ASSOCIATIONS

    Vice-President of the Commercial Litigation Committee of the Business Law Section of the Canadian Bar Association

    Guest lecturer on Civil Procedure at the Quebec Bar School

    McGill University - Faculty of Law - Lecturer: The Law for Architects and Engineers

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Université du Québec à Montréal, Faculty of Judicial Sciences
    Class of 1994
    LL.B.
    Bachelor in Law
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1972
    Montreal, Quebec, January 17, 1972

Sébastien Richemont

Partner at Woods LLP
Not yet reviewed

2000 McGill College AvenueSuite 1700Montreal, QC H3A 3H3Canada

Email Sébastien Richemont

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions