×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Pamela J. Tillman
Pro

Pamela J. Tillman

4.5
10 reviews

111 East Kilbourn Avenue, 19th Floor, Milwaukee, WI 53202-6622

Civil Litigation, Business Litigation, Insurance Coverage and 4 more

About Pamela J. Tillman

Pamela J. Tillman’s practice focuses on representing a wide variety of businesses in litigation matters, primarily in the areas of complex insurance coverage issues, commercial litigation, mortgage lending disputes, employment disputes and health care liability. Whatever the issue, she believes that it is paramount to have the experience and understanding to advise clients on the possible outcomes and costs of litigation so that clients have a comprehensive viewpoint to make the strategic decisions that drive the litigation.

Insurance coverage clients routinely call on Pam for her coverage analysis and advice in cases ranging from basic property damage coverage, to bad faith liability, and upward to complex commercial disputes. These matters involve an extensive variety of claims, including environmental pollution liability, product liability, health care liability, toxic tort and various business torts, at the trial and appellate court level.

Pam has defended banking and financial institutions in mortgage lending litigation and federal consumer claims such as claims under the Truth-in-Lending Act, Home Owners Equity Protection Act, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, Equal Credit Opportunity Act, as well as an array of state law consumer claims. Beyond this, she has also defended business litigants in product liability, toxic tort and medical negligence claims.

Pam is an active member of the Defense Research Institute and various insurance-related committees, who believes that her own practice is enhanced by continually meeting and learning from others who similarly excel in these chosen fields. She is humbled and honored that her peers’ nominations have resulted in her being named as a Rising Star® and, more recently, as a Super Lawyer® by Wisconsin Super Lawyers® for the last three years running.

 

Pamela J. Tillman (Milwaukee, Wisconsin) View website

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Pamela J. Tillman got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Pamela J.

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
4.5
See All Reviews
10
Lawyers.com
Not yet reviewed
4.5
Martindale
10
Avvo
Not yet reviewed

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation 1
    • Civil Litigation
  • Business Law 1
    • Business Litigation
  • Professional Liability
  • Other 4
    • Insurance Coverage
    • Environmental Litigation
    • Employment
    • Products Liability & Torts

Practice Details

  • Languages
    English
  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
    Accepted Credit Cards
    American Express
    MasterCard
    Visa
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Meissner Tierney Fisher & Nichols S.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Kildow, et. al. v. Mercy Health System Inc., et. al., Rock County Circuit Court (2000) (Medical negligence case
    obtained defense verdict)
    Kuehling v. Village of Unity, et. al., Clark County Circuit Court (2000) (Toxic tort
    environmental Insurance coverage action
    case settled prior to trial)
    Claflin v. Champion International, et. al., Door County Circuit Court (2001) (Toxic tort claim
    summary judgment obtained for client)
    Klemme v. Badger Mining Corp., et. al., Sheboygan County Circuit Court (2002) (Toxic tort claim
    obtained voluntary dismissal of client prior to trial)
    Baumler v. Jack H. Deckard M.D., et. al., Milwaukee County Circuit Court (2001) (Medical negligence case alleging assault
    battery
    defense verdict)
    Taddeo v. Biehn Construction, Inc., et. al., Walworth County Circuit Court (2002) (Insurance coverage action involving construction defects
    settled prior to trial)
    Tessling, et. al. v. Great Bear Lodge of Wisconsin Dells LLC, et. al., Sauk County Circuit Court (2003) (Insurance coverage action involving toxic tort claims
    summary judgment obtained for client)
    Wisconsin Electric Power Company v. Admiral Insurance Company, et. al., Milwaukee County Circuit Court (2003) (Environmental insurance coverage action
    case settled shortly prior to trial)
    TIG Insurance Company v. Great Bear Lodge of Wisconsin Dells, LLC, et. al., Dane County Circuit Court (2004) (Insurance coverage action involving toxic tort claims
    obtained summary judgment)
    Marshall Erdman & Associates, Inc. v. TIG Insurance Company, Dane County Circuit Court (2004) (Insurance coverage action involving construction defect claims
    case settled prior to trial) (parallel action filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio)
    Rockwell Automation v. Nationwide & Kemper, Milwaukee County Circuit Court (2004) (Asbestos insurance coverage case
    settled prior to trial)
    Archdiocese of Milwaukee v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London, et. al. Milwaukee County Circuit Court (2004) (parallel action filed in Orange County Superior Court, California) (Insurance coverage action involving clergy sexual abuse claims
    case pending)
    Cleaver Brooks v. AIU, et. al., Milwaukee County Circuit Court (2004) (Asbestos insurance coverage case
    case settled prior to trial)
    Plastics Engineering Company v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, United States District Court Eastern District of Wisconsin (2004) (Asbestos insurance coverage case
    resolved by Wisconsin Supreme Court)
    International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., et. al., Waukesha County Circuit Court (2004) (Insurance coverage action regarding toxic tort claims
    case settled without client contributing to settlement)
    Rogers, et. al. v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund, et. al., Washington County Circuit Court (2004) (Insurance coverage for health care liability claims
    obtained summary judgment for insurer
    affirmed on appeal)
    Wolf & Company, Milwaukee, S.C., et. al. v. Continental Casualty Company, United States District Court of the Eastern District of Wisconsin (2005) (bad faith claim
    case settled prior to trial)
    Kaminski v. American St
    ard, Inc., et. al., Milwaukee County Circuit Court (2005) (Asbestos insurance coverage action
    obtained summary judgment for client)
    United States Fire Insurance Company v. Kolbe & Kolbe Millwork Co., Inc., et. al., Marathon County Circuit Court (2006) (Insurance coverage action regarding defective products
    settled prior to trial)
    Bituminous Fire & Marine Insurance Company, et. al. v. D.P. Wigley Company, et. al., Racine County Circuit Court (2006) (Asbestos insurance coverage action
    obtained partial summary judgment for insurer
    settled prior to trial)
    The Sherwin-Williams Company v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London, et. al., Court of Common Pleas, Cuyahoga County, Ohio (2006) (Insurance coverage action regarding lead paint
    case pending)
    Morrow v. Specialty Underwriters LLC, et. al., United States District Court Middle District of Florida (2006) (Tortious interference with contract claim
    obtained voluntary dismissal of case prior to trial)
    Continental Western Insurance Co. v. R-Tech Dental Equipment Service LLC, Chippewa County Circuit Court (2006) (Negligence case against equipment company
    settled prior to trial)
    Wisconsin Electric Power Company v. The Northern Assurance Company of America, United States District Court Western District of Wisconsin (2007) (Environmental insurance coverage action
    case settled shortly prior to trial)
    Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. BWAY Corp., et. al, Milwaukee County Circuit Court, removed to federal court (2007) (Insurance coverage action regarding lead paint
    settled prior to trial) (parallel action filed in the Superior Court for Gwinnett County, Georgia)
    Schultz, et. al. v. Wisconsin Injured Patients & Families Compensation Fund, et. al., Milwaukee County Circuit Court (2007) (Insurance coverage for health care liability claims
    obtained summary judgment for insurer)
    Paar, et. al. v. St. Lawrence Liquidating Company, et. al., Racine County Circuit Court (2008) (Asbestos insurance coverage action
    case pending)
    Kirkorian, et. al. v. St. Lawrence Liquidating Company, et. al., Racine County Circuit Court (2008) (Asbestos insurance coverage action
    case pending)
    Connors, et. al. v. Dr. David Ziegler, et. al., Racine County Circuit Court (2008) (Insurance coverage for health care liability claims
    case resolved prior to trial)
    Phone Management Company v. Jeffrey J. Chayer, et. al., Waupaca County Circuit Court (2009) (Contract dispute
    case pending)
    Ansul, Inc. v. Employers Ins. Of Wausau, et. al., Marinette County Circuit Court (2009) (Environmental insurance coverage action
    case pending)
    Kling, et. al. v. EMC Mortgage Corporation, et. al., United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin (2008) (Mortgage fraud
    case pending)
    Rojo, et. al. v. EMC Mortgage Corporation, et. al., United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin (2009) (Mortgage fraud
    case pending)
    Zimmerman v. Greg Logemann, et. al., United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin (2009) (Mortgage fraud
    case pending).
  • Additional Links
    http://www.mtfn.com http://www.mtfn.com/attorneys-Pamela-Tillman.html

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2000, Wisconsin
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
    2000, U.S. District Court, Eastern and Western Districts of Wisconsin
    Memberships
    Milwaukee Bar Association (Bench-Bar Civil Division and Professionalism Committees)
    American Bar Associations
    State Bar of Wisconsin
    Defense Research Institute (Insurance Law Committee and CGL Subcommittee)
    Eastern District of Wisconsin Bar Association
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Marquette University Law School
    Class of 2000
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
    Class of 1995
    B.S.
    cum laude

Contact Pamela J. Tillman

Share Holder at Meissner Tierney Fisher & Nichols S.C.
4.5
10 reviews

The Milwaukee Center, 111 East Kilbourn Avenue, 19th FloorMilwaukee, WI 53202-6622U.S.A.

Show on map
Fax: 414-273-5840
Office Hours:
  • Monday 08:00 AM - 06:00 PM
  • Tuesday 08:00 AM - 06:00 PM
  • Wednesday 08:00 AM - 06:00 PM
  • Thursday 08:00 AM - 06:00 PM
  • Friday 08:00 AM - 06:00 PM
  • Saturday By appointment
  • Sunday By appointment

Activity

Legal Community Contributions

Email Pamela J. Tillman

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • Does this attorney maintain a professional presence on any social networks?
    Yes, Pamela J. Tillman has a professional profile on LinkedIn.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Meissner Tierney Fisher & Nichols S.C. has 20 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Pamela J. Tillman attended Marquette University Law School.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Meissner Tierney Fisher & Nichols S.C. was established in 1848.
  • Is this attorney listed in the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers?
    Pamela J. Tillman is listed in the Antitrust Law, Appellate Practice, Arbitration, Business Law, Civil Rights, Civil Trial Practice, Class Actions, Commercial Law, Commercial Litigation, Construction Law, Corporate Law, Creditors Rights, Employment Benefits Law, Environmental Law, Franchise Law, Health Care Law, Insurance Defense, Insurance Law, Intellectual Property Law, Labor and Employment Law, Legal Malpractice, Libel, Slander and Defamation, Mergers and Acquisitions, Municipal and Zoning Law, Nonprofit and Tax Exempt Organizations, Partnership Law, Patent, Trademark, Copyright and Unfair Competition, Premises Liability, Product Liability Law, Professional Liability, Real Estate Law, Securities Law, Tax Law, Toxic Torts, Trademark, Copyright, and Unfair Competition, Trusts and Estates and Wills and Probate section of the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions