About M. Stephen Smith

Steve Smith is a Florida Bar Board Certified Civil Trial attorney who focuses on defending mass tort exposure cases as well as complex claims arising from commercial and professional relationships. A seasoned trial lawyer, Steve tries cases and handles appeals in state and federal courts throughout Florida.

He defends clients in cases asserting exposure to asbestos, carbon monoxide, pesticides among other substances. This mass tort experience extends to medical devices in both individual cases and MDL proceedings. He has tried cases venued in Louisiana, Michigan and Virginia as well as Florida.

Steve represents professionals against malpractice claims in a variety of fields including legal, accounting, real estate, and medical/health. His business litigation matters have included contract, fraud and statutory actions.

Certifications

•Florida Bar Board Certified Civil Trial Attorney
•AV-Rated by Martindale-Hubbell

Articles & Presentations

•Author, 4th DCA Affirms Mental Healthcare Providers Owe No Legal Duty to Warn Unidentifiable Potential Victims, June 19, 2020
•“Asbestos Litigation,” Association of Corporate Counsel - Lecturer - August 2004

Steve's News and Insights

09.21.2020
Firm News

RumbergerKirk Attorneys Serve as Jurors and Scoring Judges During the UF Law Trial Team Final Four Competition

Several lawyers from RumbergerKirk served as jurors and scoring judges...

06.19.2020
Professional Liability

4th DCA Affirms Mental Healthcare Providers Owe No Legal Duty to Warn Unidentifiable Potential Victims

The Fourth District Court of Appeal issued its opinion in...

Photo: Shutterstock/Chinnapong

11.15.2018
Beyond the Bio

Digging Deeper: Steve Smith Talks about the Evolution of Trials and his Outdoor Trails

A partner in RK’s Miami office, Steve Smith is a...

02.07.2018
Firm News

A Focus on Mentoring: RK Participates in the Kozyak Minority Mentoring Foundation’s Annual Minority Mentoring Picnic

Strong mentoring is at the heart of RK’s culture and...

 

Awards

Reviews for M. Stephen

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Environmental Law
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Professional Liability
  • Other 2
    • Chemicals, Asbestos and Toxic Torts
    • Product Liability

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell Professional Association
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Notable Cases: Bastida v. Batchelor: 418 So. 2d 297 (Fla. App. 3 Dist., 1982)
    Airline shareholder dispute. Improper directed verdict at trial reversed.
    Florida Power & Light Co. v. Allis Chalmers Corp.: 893 F.2d 1313 (C.A.11 (Fla.),1990)
    Summary judgment in favor of electric transformer manufacturer affirmed in a poly chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) cleanup contribution action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation,
    Liability Act (CERCLA).
    Begley v. Truly Nolan Exterminating, Inc.: 573 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. App. 3 Dist., 1991)
    Summary judgment in favor of a pesticide manufacturer. First Florida decision upholding federal preemption under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide
    Rodenticide Act (FIFRA).
    Miller v. Selden: 591 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. App. 4 Dist., 1991)
    Judgment entered in favor of accountant client against former member of medical limited partnership.
    Chesterton v. Fisher: 655 So. 2d 170 (Fla. App. 3 Dist., 1995)
    Judgment against asbestos product manufacturer reversed. Subsequent favorable settlement.
    Bankers Trust Realty, Inc. v. Kluger: 672 So. 2d 897 (Fla. App. 3 Dist., 1996)
    Legal malpractice complaint dismissed for failure to state a claim.
    Garlock, Inc. v. Harriman: 665 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. App. 3 Dist., 1996)
    Judgment against asbestos products manufacturer reversed for improper jury instruction. Subsequent settlement very favorable.
    Rucker v. Garlock, Inc.: 672 So. 2d 100 (Fla. App. 3 Dist., 1996)
    Defense verdict in favor of asbestos products manufacturer affirmed in a case where defendant manufacturer's defenses were stricken.
    Broderick v. Danek Medical, Inc.: 1999 WL 1062135 (S.D. Fla.)
    Summary Judgment in favor of defendant manufacturer/distributor of orthopedic bone screws (Federal MDL, ED PA.).
    Casamassina v. U.S. Life Ins. Co. in City of New York: 958 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. App. 4 Dist., 2007)
    Summary judgment finding of no duty in favor of medical agent of life insurance co. affirmed.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1975, Florida
    U.S. District Court of Michigan (Eastern)
    U.S. District Courts of Florida (Northern, Middle, Southern)
    U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Memberships

    Professional

    •Defense Research Institute
    •American Bar Association
    •Dade County Bar Association
    •Professional Liability Defense Federation
    •Claims and Litigation Management Alliance

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Florida, College of Law
    Class of 1975
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Lehigh University
    Class of 1972
    B.A.
    Economics and Mathematics

    Lehigh University
    Class of 1972
    B.A.
    cum laude
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    M. Stephen Smith was admitted in 1975 to the State of Florida.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    M. Stephen Smith is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit and United States Supreme Court.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    M. Stephen Smith attended University of Florida, College of Law.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell Professional Association was established in 1978.