×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Greenberg Traurig, LLPShare Holder
Jay Andrew Yagoda
Pro

Jay Andrew Yagoda

Not yet reviewed

333 SE 2nd Avenue, Suite 4400, Miami, FL 33131

Appeals & Legal Issues, Litigation and Appellate Practice

About Jay Andrew Yagoda

Jay Yagoda is a shareholder in the Miami Appeals & Legal Issues and Miami Litigation Practice groups. Following a clerkship at the Florida Supreme Court, Jay has gained experience handling a wide variety of appellate matters in state courts throughout Florida and in federal courts across the country. Jay also litigates cases involving complex legal issues at the trial-court level to position clients for appellate success and provides litigation support to trial counsel during all phases of litigation, including pre-trial and post-trial motion practice. He has presented appellate oral argument before Florida’s District Courts of Appeal and the United States Court of Appeals for the First and Eleventh Circuits and has argued on behalf of clients in state and federal trial courts. In 2021, Jay was recognized by Florida Trend's Legal Elite as an Up and Comer for representing the future of the legal profession in Florida.

Concentrations

•Appellate practice •Litigation trial support •Land use/developer litigation and appeals •Attorneys’ fees litigation •Punitive damages litigation •Mass torts and multidistrict litigation •Products liability litigation •Pharmaceutical, medical device, and health care litigation •Education finance litigation

Clerkships

•Hon. Barbara J. Pariente, Supreme Court of Florida, 2010-2012

Recognition & Leadership

Awards & Accolades

•Team Member, Daily Business Review, 'Florida Legal Awards: Cross Border Disputes Award,' 2023 •Listed, Super Lawyers magazine, Florida Super Lawyers, 'Rising Stars,' 2015-2023 •Listed, Florida Trend, Legal Elite, 'Up and Comers,' 2021-2022

 

Jay Andrew Yagoda (Miami, Florida) View website

Reviews for Jay

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Appellate Practice
  • Other 1
    • Appeals & Legal Issues

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Accepted Credit Cards
    American Express
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Representative Matters: Obtained a full affirmance of new trial awarded to defendant convicted of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act violation after trial court victory on post-trial motion. United States v. Boncy, 8 F.4th 30 (1st Cir. 2021).
    Secured a complete reversal of a trial court order allowing a punitive damages claim to proceed against defendant for work-place accident.
    Defended manufacturer of medical devices in all claims concerning vascular devices, including overseeing Florida team in numerous rem
    ed cases across Florida's federal district courts.
    Secured affirmance of complete dismissal of employment
    wrongful death lawsuit in state appellate courts
    later secured dismissal of successive appeal of plaintiffs' renewed lawsuit filed in federal court. Roig v. United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 21-11915-HH, 2021 WL 6102102, at *1 (11th Cir. Sept. 1, 2021)
    Estate of Roig v. United Parcel Services, Inc., 295 So. 3d 838 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020).
    Obtained complete affirmance of dismissal of employment lawsuit with prejudice. Logtenberg v. Koenpack USA, Inc., No. 2019-211-AP-01, 2020 WL 991858 (Fla. Cir. Ct., App. Div., Feb. 20, 2020).
    Assisted in securing complete affirmance of summary judgment in favor of developer in homeowners' association funding dispute. Valencia Reserve Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Boynton Beach Associates, XIX, LLLP, 278 So. 3d 714 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019).
    Assisted in securing affirmance of summary judgment in favor of insurer that denied coverage for property damage claim. O. Beach Corp. v. Great American Insurance Co. of New York, 791 F. App'x 106 (11th Cir. 2019).
    Obtained complete affirmance of trial judgment in favor of tenant in lawsuit brought by l
    lord for return of deposit. Greenberg v. Mouyal, 259 So. 3d 103 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).
    Assisted in obtaining affirmance of zoning board decisions granting variance
    certificate of appropriateness requests in favor of developer for planned redevelopment of mixed-use property in historic district.
    Obtained affirmance of trial court's order denying motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, involving extensive jurisdictional discovery, to allow lawsuit to proceed in Florida state court. Beracha v. Ardura, 171 So. 3d 723 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015).
    Secured affirmance of residential foreclosure judgment. Rodriguez v. Bank of New York, 130 So. 3d 1288 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).
  • Additional Links
    http://https//www.gtlaw.com/

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2010, Florida
    Supreme Court of the United States
    U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida
    U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
    U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
    Memberships

    Professional & Community Involvement

    •Board Member, Third District Court of Appeal Historical Society
    •Treasurer
    •Member, The Florida Bar
    •Member, Appellate Practice Section
    •Member, Dade County Bar Association
    •Member, American Bar Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Florida Levin College of Law
    Class of 2010
    J.D.
    magna cum laude
    Other Education
    Order of the Coif

    Executive Research Editor, University of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy

    University of Florida
    Class of 2007
    B.A.
    cum laude

Email Jay Andrew Yagoda

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Jay Andrew Yagoda is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and United States Supreme Court.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP has 2750 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Jay Andrew Yagoda attended University of Florida Levin College of Law.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP was established in 1967.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions