Sheppard MullinPartner

Paul Scott Cowie

About Paul Scott Cowie

Paul Scott Cowie is a lawyer practicing labor and employment, labor and employment litigation, intellectual property and 12 other areas of law. Paul has been licensed for 19 years. Paul practices at Sheppard Mullin in Menlo Park, CA.

Reviews for Paul

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Labor and Employment 1
    • Discrimination
  • Intellectual Property 1
    • Trade Secrets
  • Transportation
  • Contracts
  • Class Actions
  • Other 8
    • Labor and Employment Litigation
    • Cannabis
    • Emerging Company & Venture Capital
    • Esports & Games
    • Food and Beverage
    • Healthcare
    • Retail, Fashion & Beauty
    • Trucking and Logistics

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Sheppard Mullin
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Currently h
    ling approximately 80 class actions involving claims for discrimination, misclassification, FCRA,
    all variety of wage
    hour violations, including suitable seating, meal
    rest breaks, minimum wage, bag checks, expense reimbursement, uniforms, joint employment, piece rate,
    many st
    alone PAGA lawsuits. Paul is also managing approximately four dozen active single Plaintiff cases involving alleged harassment, discrimination, retaliation
    wrongful termination (among many other claims).

    Representative Experience: 2022: Ninth Circuit affirmation of summary judgment for Swift Transportation in a putative class action alleging meal
    rest period violations under California law.
    2022: Complete dismissal of all claims against gig-economy client
    an individual defendant on an anti-SLAPP motion with an award of fees against the plaintiff in a case alleging negligence
    asserting a false report to the police, among other claims.
    2022: Compelled individual arbitration in a PAGA action in state court for regional fast food chain client
    then defeated individual claims in arbitration.
    2022: Sheppard Mullin was brought into this case several years into the litigation to argue an industry-wide issue in the Washington State Supreme Court in 2019, which we won. Sheppard Mullin then filed a motion for summary judgment as to each of the remaining causes of action against the certified class. In September 2022, the district court granted summary judgment as to the three highest value claims
    held two other low value claims had disputed facts that need to be tried. The Court denied the plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment. The decision effectively ended the case.
    2022: Dismissal of all claims on motion for judgment on the pleadings on behalf of gig-economy client in a case alleging negligence, worker's compensation,
    failure to provide safe place of work. In what was a first in California ruling for a gig-economy company, the Court ruled that rideshare companies owed no statutory or common law duty to conduct background checks on passengers as a matter of law.
    2022: Prevailed on two motions for summary judgment as to all claims on behalf of gig-economy client in a contentious case involving an assault
    battery. All claims were dismissed,
    the claimants were ordered to pay a portion of our client's costs.
    2021: Appellate affirmation of denial of class certification for construction company client.
    2021: Compelled individual arbitration
    in doing so obtained dismissal of representative PAGA claims for health care client.
    2021: Dismissal of all claims against gig-economy client with respect to a passenger's lawsuit to hold the company vicariously liable for a driver's actions, including alleged claims of negligent hiring, retention, supervision,
    training against the company.
    2021: Appellate affirmation of trial court order compelling arbitration for electronics company
    dismissing class claims.
    2021: Prevailed on motion for judgment on the pleadings on behalf of retail client in representative PAGA action alleging misclassification of independent contractors.
    2019: Compelled individual arbitration
    dismissal of class claims in a putative wage
    hour class action in federal court for client Smart & Final Stores,
    simultaneously prevailed on demurrer in PAGA representative action in state court brought by same plaintiff.
    2019: After three days of planned 10-day arbitration, secured a complete dismissal of all claims without any payment for nationwide healthcare client with respect to former employee's alleged gender discrimination, harassment, retaliation, failure to remedy, wrongful termination,
    intentional infliction of emotional distress claims.
    2019: Washington State Supreme Court win for employers as to legitimacy of commission
    piece rate compensation structures (lead counsel
    presented oral argument). This was the first
    only win for an employer in the Washington State Supreme Court in years.
    2018: Obtained summary judgment in a wage & hour rest break putative class action.
    2018: Obtained summary judgment in disability discrimination single Plaintiff lawsuit.
    2018: Presented two 9th Circuit oral arguments, including overturning district court regarding proprietary of removal
    how to calculate the amount in controversy.
    2017: Defeated class certification for client Swift Transportation for wage
    hour class action, convincing court to overturn 24-page tentative ruling issued at the hearing.
    2017: Compelled individual arbitration of 24,000 person putative class in expansive wage
    hour class action for client Smart & Final Stores.
    2017: Defeated certification in wage
    hour class action for client Swift Transportation alleging rest break violations, convincing court to overturn 36-page tentative ruling issued at the hearing.
    2017: Defeated class certification despite facially unlawful policy.
    2016: Defeated class certification in a 20,000 plus putative class member wage
    hour (multiple causes of action) class action with exposure into the billions of dollars for client Swift Transportation.
    2016: Defeated class certification of wage statement class for client Save Mart Supermarkets.
    2015: Dismissal with prejudice without any payment for client Brookdale Senior Living with respect to a former employee's age discrimination
    wrongful termination suit.
    2015: Dismissal for client Cox Communications without paying a cent on Plaintiff's six causes of action including for Wrongful Termination in Violation of Public Policy
    Negligent Investigation.
    2015: Represented Benchmark Electronics in defeating Plaintiff former employee's claims for wrongful termination
    retaliation under Labor Code section 1102.5 without paying a penny.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2007, California
    UK
    United States District Courts for the Northern and Central Districts of California
    United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    Memberships

    Memberships

    •State Bar of California
    •UK Licensed Solicitor

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Northumbria at Newcastle, UK
    Class of 2001
    J.D.
    honors

    University of Northumbria at Newcastle, UK
    LL.B.
    honors

Paul Scott Cowie

Partner at Sheppard Mullin
Not yet reviewed

1540 El Camino Real, Suite 120Menlo Park, CA 94025U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Grant A. Winter
Pro
Grant A. Winter
5.0
Labor and Employment lawyer

Free Consultation

Paul F. Donsbach
Pro
Paul F. Donsbach
4.7
Labor and Employment lawyer

Free Consultation

John R. Holstedt
Pro
John R. Holstedt
5.0
Labor and Employment lawyer

Free Consultation

Joseph A. Hoffmann
Pro
Joseph A. Hoffmann
5.0
Labor and Employment lawyer

Free Consultation

David P. Mastagni
Pro
David P. Mastagni
5.0
Labor and Employment lawyer

Free Consultation

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: