Cases
Experience: Representing leading EDA tool maker in 2 patent assertion in the Northern District of California.
Representing leading chip manufacturer in negotiations against Intellectual Ventures.
Representing leading streaming service provider in multiple IPRs concerning streaming content.
Representing leading software provider in 3 patent assertion in the Western District of Texas related to communication protocols after successful transfer from the Eastern District of Texas.
Representing leading streaming service provider in 15+ IPRs
related appeals against Broadcom. The patents claim techniques for managing web services, video compression,
adaptive streaming.
Representing leading streaming service providers in 6 IPRS involving technologies including partial frame encryption
adaptive streaming. Representation has included successful appeals to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, followed by successful rem
proceedings.
Represented leading semiconductor company in 6 district court actions across Delaware
Massachusetts as well as
ITC investigation, with a total of 11 patents being asserted. Settled favorably. Previously represented the same company in an ITC investigation which was voluntarily dropped by the plaintiff before trial.
Represented leading technology company
graphics card manufacturer in two IPRs. Settled prior to institution of IPRs.
Represented leading streaming service provider in 2021 in a Central District of California patent dispute
a corresponding IPR. Obtained institution of the IPR, after which Patent Owner surrendered all claims
dismissed the district court action.
Represented leading semiconductor company in 2 IPRs against IP Value Management subsidiary involving microcontrollers, FPGAs,
other programmable devices, with both IPRs instituted
all challenged claims found invalid in Final Written Decisions.
Represented leading video game company in Western District of Texas litigation involving erasure code technology. Case settled favorably.
Represented leading ticket website in Western District of Texas litigation. Plaintiff dismissed action without payment.
Represented leading software provider in 2021 in Western District of Texas litigation involving 3 asserted patents before obtaining favorable dismissal.
Represented leading furniture manufacturers in Eastern District of Texas case
2 related IPRS concerning augmented reality technology. Case settled favorably.
Represented leading drone manufacturer in patent dispute, including declaratory judgment filing in the District of Delaware. Case settled favorably.
Represented leading streaming service provider in 7 instituted PTAB challenges relating to compression technology. To date over 85 claims have been found unpatentable across 5 patents.
Represented leading semiconductor manufacturer in multiple IPR challenges concerning 802.11
Bluetooth technology that were instituted
all asserted claims found invalid.
Represented a leading streaming provider of music in 4 IPR proceedings that settled shortly after the filing of the IPRs .
Represented leading sporting goods company in the Central District of California litigation
obtained dismissal before responding to complaint after sending Rule 11 letter.
Represented leading TV manufacturer in the Eastern District of Texas in case involving various technologies including 802.11. Case settled favorably.
In summer of 2018, following institution on all challenged claims for a leading wearable device company, the Patent Owner (a Wi-LAN subsidiary) gave up
disclaimed all of the challenged claims.
Represented a leading stream service provider of music in litigation in Delaware. Case settled favorably.
In fall of 2017, after taking over for prior IPR counsel, conducted oral arguments before the Federal Circuit for a leading streaming service provider regarding a Final Written Decision of an IPR proceeding in which the claims were not found unpatentable. The Federal Circuit reversed the decision (without rem
),
found all challenged claims obvious.
Representing leading wearable device company in multiple IPR
Federal Circuit court proceedings.
In Fall of 2017, received a dismissal of a Central District of California lawsuit without any payment for a leading ride-share provider prior to even formally responding to the Complaint.
Represented a leading medical device company in multiple IPR proceedings involving a competitor.
In Fall of 2016, received a dismissal of a Delaware lawsuit without any payment for a leading ride-share provider prior to even formally responding to the Complaint.
In Fall of 2016, received a Federal Circuit decision for a leading video stream provider affirming a Final Written Decision by the PTAB invalidating claims asserted against his client.
In Spring of 2016, represented a leading financial services company defending against a claim of patent infringement in the Eastern District of Texas. Prior to having to file an Answer, received a walkaway dismissal with prejudice for the client.
Represented leading telecommunications provider in patent infringement case related to internet filtering.
Representing leading streaming video provider in various IP related matters, including litigation defense, multiple IPRs
CBMs,
two Federal Circuit Appeals.
Representing leading semiconductor company in patent dispute regarding integrated circuit buses.
Represented a leading medical device company in litigation regarding a patent related to 3D medical imaging. The case was quickly settled.
Represented industry leader in four separate litigations, more than 15 IPR proceedings, as well as Federal Circuit appeals involving telecommunication software
products. Conducted two jury trials, including arguing motions before the court,
taking of inventor
expert witnesses. After more than 3 years of litigation, 12 out of the 15 patents asserted against client have been invalidated, another 3 unilaterally dropped by the plaintiff.
After threatened assertion of a large patent portfolio by semiconductor processing competitor, led negotiations which resulted in competitor walking away from original assertions.
Represented leading router manufacturer in an ITC investigation
corresponding District of Delaware litigation involving Power-over-Ethernet technology. Only weeks before ITC trial, petitioner unilaterally dropped the entire investigation.
Represented leading software company in patent litigation in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware relating to certain technologies used in enterprise software. The case settled very favorably.
Represented one of the largest cell phone manufacturers in the world in various patent litigations in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas relating to transmission technology. The case settled favorably.
Represented a car component manufacturer in patent litigation in the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina related to turbocharger technology. The day after winning numerous pre-trial motions
just prior to jury selection, the case settled favorably.
Represented leading semiconductor
processor company in various litigations concerning 802.11, CDMA2000, Bluetooth
other wireless technologies in the Eastern District of Texas. The case settled favorably on the eve of trial.
