×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Maureen Phyllis Taylor

Maureen Phyllis Taylor

Not yet reviewed

325 West Main Street, Louisville, KY 40202

Commercial Litigation, Construction Law, Fidelity and Surety Law and 5 more

About Maureen Phyllis Taylor

Maureen Phyllis Taylor is a lawyer practicing commercial litigation, construction law, fidelity and surety law and 5 other areas of law. Maureen received a M.A. degree from Michigan State University, and has been licensed for 37 years. Maureen practices at Conliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan in Louisville, KY.

Maureen Phyllis Taylor (Louisville, Kentucky)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Maureen Phyllis Taylor got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Maureen

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Law 1
    • Commercial Litigation
  • Construction Law
  • Fidelity and Surety 1
    • Fidelity and Surety Law
  • Appellate Practice
  • Commercial Real Estate
  • Contracts
  • Insurance

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Member
    Firm Name
    Conliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Dugan & Meyers Constr. Co., Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Adm. Servs., 113 Ohio St.3d 226, 864 N.E.2d 68 (Ohio 2007) (amicus brief supporting ODAS)
    Too, Inc. v. TJX Companies, Inc., 229 F.Supp.2d 825 (S.D. Ohio 2002)
    W.G. Fairfield Co. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Com'n., 285 F.3d 499 (6th Cir. 2002)
    Anderson v. Pine South Capital, LLC, 177 F.Supp.2d 591 (W.D. Ky. 2001)
    Big Yank Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co., 125 F.3d 308 (6th Cir. 1997)
    Big Yank Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co., 203 B.R. 537 (S.D. N.Y. 1996)
    King Bearings, Inc. v. King Bearing, Inc., 882 F.Supp.630 (W.D. Ky. 1994)
    Helm v. Citizens To Protect the Prospect Area, Inc. (COPPA), 864 S.W.2d 312 (Ky. App. 1993)
    Lilly v. Citizens Fidelity Bank & Trust Co., 859 S.W.2d 666 (Ky. App. 1993).

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1989, Kentucky
    1989, U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky
    1990, U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
    1990, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky
    1997, Ohio
    1997, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Ohio
    Memberships
    Kentucky Bar Association
    Louisville Bar Association
    American Bar Association
    Ohio State Bar Association.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Michigan
    Class of 1989
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Michigan State University
    M.A.
    English Literature

    University of Michigan
    A.B.

    Western Michigan University
    Ed.D.
    Educational Leadership

Maureen Phyllis Taylor

Member at Conliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan
Not yet reviewed

250 Waterfront Plaza, 325 West Main StreetLouisville, KY 40202U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Joseph B. Suhre, Esq.
Pro
Joseph B. Suhre, Esq.
5.0
298
Commercial Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

513-823-9790
View Profile
Tracy Sullivan Prewitt
Pro
Tracy Sullivan Prewitt
5.0
2
Commercial Litigation lawyer
502-826-9008
View Profile
James R. Chadward Kessinger
Pro
James R. Chadward Kessinger
4.6
11
Commercial Litigation lawyer
502-768-4533
View Profile
Gerald R Toner
Pro
Gerald R Toner
5.0
1
Commercial Litigation lawyer
502-885-5731
View Profile

Email Maureen Phyllis Taylor

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Maureen Phyllis Taylor was admitted in 1989 to the State of Kentucky.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Maureen Phyllis Taylor is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio and United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Maureen Phyllis Taylor attended University of Michigan.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Conliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan was established in 1964.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions