×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Office | Louisville, KY

Conliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan Pro

4.7
26 reviews

325 West Main Street, Louisville, KY 40202, U.S.A.

Business Litigation, Shareholder Disputes, Inverse Condemnation and Nuisance Claims and 52 more

MEET OUR TEAM

Scott A. Johnson - Lawyer in Louisville, KY
Pro
Pro
Member Scott A.
Johnson
Meet all 8 Lawyers

About Conliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan

Conliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan (CS&S) has built a reputation over the last 50 years by serving a wide range of clients, from individuals to Fortune 500 companies, across Kentucky, Southern Indiana, and Ohio. Known for its commitment to integrity and professionalism, the firm handles diverse legal areas, including litigation, business and commerce, securities, environmental law, insurance, personal injury, and estate planning. CS&S's team of attorneys includes top-rated professionals in each field of practice, earning the firm an “A” rating from Martindale-Hubbell and recognition in the Bar Register’s Preeminent Lawyers™.

Representing both plaintiffs and defendants, CS&S leverages its skills to approach each case with comprehensive insights and strategic precision. This broad experience equips the firm to navigate complex legal challenges effectively, consistently delivering results that benefit clients. CS&S prides itself on upholding high ethical standards while striving to meet each client's unique needs. The firm’s legal professionals are dedicated to providing rigorous, results-oriented representation, backed by decades of deep-rooted knowledge and community connections. CS&S welcomes the opportunity to discuss how its attorneys can help address a variety of legal needs.

 

Conliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan (Louisville, Kentucky)
View website

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Conliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Conliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan

Have you consulted or hired this firm?

Leave a review about your experience with this firm.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
4.7
See All Reviews
26
1.8
Lawyers.com
1
4.8
Martindale
25
Avvo
Not yet reviewed
Showing 1-1 of 1 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
0%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
100%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
3.0
Quality of Service
1.0
Responsiveness
2.0
Value for Money
1.0
Business Law
Posted by anonymous
November 08, 2022
Hired Attorney Kenneth A. Bohnert

Kenneth took on my case which he claimed they “firm” most likely would take on contingency. He took the initial retainer and then bounced me around to a few different attorneys in the practice which racked up the bill. Then they, Kenneth and another practicing Lawyer requested additional money to continue to work on a case that they didn’t seem to think they had correct jurisdiction for which if they believed that then should have never taken my retainer to start with. Luckily I’m able to move forward but I wasted a year working with this lawyer as the “likely” process to a contingency case was very misleading. I never leave bad reviews but I’m hoping to save someone else the trouble I went through.

 
From the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network

Services

Areas of Law

  • Business Law 4
    • Business Litigation
    • Franchise Disputes
    • Business Valuation Disputes
    • Business and Contract Disputes
  • Securities 2
    • Shareholder Disputes
    • Shareholder Liability
  • Investments 1
    • Derivative Actions
  • Insurance 3
    • Insurance Coverage Issues
    • Indemnity Actions
    • Insurance Disputes
  • Construction Law 3
    • Construction and Surety Litigation
    • Construction Delay
    • Construction Disputes
  • Personal Injury 3
    • Car Accidents
    • Truck Accidents
    • Motorcycle Accidents
  • Labor and Employment 3
    • Employment Litigation
    • Wrongful Discharge
    • Sexual Harassment
  • Head and Spinal Injuries 1
    • Traumatic Brain Injuries
  • Family Law 4
    • Child Sexual Abuse
    • Child Support and Custody
    • Paternity Actions
    • Adoptions
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Civil Rights 2
    • Employment Discrimination
    • Civil Rights Violations
  • Premises Liability 1
    • Negligent Security
  • Products Liability
  • Workers Compensation
  • Zoning, Planning and Land Use 1
    • Zoning Issues
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution 1
    • Arbitration and Mediation
  • Government 1
    • Government Relations and Regulatory
  • Other 19
    • Inverse Condemnation and Nuisance Claims
    • Fraudulent Transfers
    • Environmental Contamination and Cost Recovery
    • UCC and Banking Issues
    • Defense of Wrongful Termination and Sexual Harassment Claims
    • Structural/Mechanical Design and Failure
    • Mechanic Lien Enforcement
    • Coal Reclamation Bonds
    • Construction Payment and Performance Bonds
    • Securities Litigation and Brokerage Liability Claims
    • Suitability Claims
    • Failure to Monitor and Supervise Claims
    • 1933 and 1934 Securities Act Violations
    • Fraud, Misrepresentation and Churning Claims
    • Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Claims
    • FINRA and NASD Arbitration
    • Disability
    • Maintenance
    • Government and Municipal Defense

Office Details

  • Firm History
    Year Established

    1964

  • Partnership & Affiliations
    Partnerships

    Professional Limited Liability Company

  • Representative Clients

    REPRESENTATIVE CLIENTS: Waste Management, Inc.; First Bank, Inc.; Wells Fargo Financial Acceptance Corp.; Securities Industry Association; BAE Systems, Inc.; A.I. Management & Prof. Liab. Claim Adjusters; United General Title Insurance Company; National Association of the Remolding Industry (KY); Beneficial Commercial Corp.; Federated Mutual Insurance Company; Continental Loss Adjusting Service; Flint Ink Corporation; Chemical Waste Management, Inc.; Chem-Nuclear, Inc.; TIAA-CREF; CREF; Farmers Bank & Capitol Trust Company; Paralyzed Veterans of America, Kentucky and Indiana Chapters; American Home Assurance Company; National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, P.A.; Landmark Insurance Companies; The Wine Institute; AMS Temporaries, Inc.; Underwriters Safety & Claims Inc.; Risk Management Services Co.; AT&T; Franklin County Kentucky, Kentucky Advance Revenue Program; National Tobacco Company; Lendmark Financial Services; Commonwealth of Kentucky, Finance and Administration Cabinet; Hasbro, Inc.

  • Additional Links

    http://cssattorneys.com/

Contact Conliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan

4.7
26 reviews

250 Waterfront Plaza, 325 West Main StreetLouisville, KY 40202U.S.A.

Show on map

Email Conliffe, Sandmann & Sullivan

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions