×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman LLPPartner
Stephen M. Caine
Pro

Stephen M. Caine

Not yet reviewed

401 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1070, Los Angeles, CA 90024-3702

Appellate, Legal Malpractice, Medical Malpractice and Healthcare Law and 1 more

About Stephen M. Caine

An experienced attorney of over 30 years, Stephen Caine’s practice focuses on the representation of clients in appellate and trial courts primarily in the defense of professional liability claims. He defends architects, engineers, attorneys, accountants, doctors, nurses, and other licensed professionals in commercial and corporate litigation, homeowners’ association liability, civil RICO claims, insurance “bad faith” actions, toxic exposure claims including asbestos litigation and California’s “Prop. 65,” and general liability tort claims.

He has been certified as a specialist in appellate law by the California State Bar Board of Legal Specialization since 2002. Steve has researched and authored over 125 appellate briefs in the California Court of Appeal, California Supreme Court, and United States Court of Appeal.

Newsroom

News

•Frances O'Meara and Her Team Join WSHB as Trial Attorneys
Firm News, 7.19.22

Publications

•Attorneys Duty to Notify Opposing Party of Intent to Seek a Default
Case Updates, 10.31.22

In the News

•WSHB's Epic Win: Appellate Victory in Contentious Litigation
•Attorneys Duty to Notify Opposing Party of Intent to Seek a Default
•Frances O'Meara and Her Team Join WSHB as Trial Attorneys

 

Stephen M. Caine (Los Angeles, California) View website

Reviews for Stephen M. Caine

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility 1
    • Legal Malpractice
  • Professional Liability
  • Other 2
    • Appellate
    • Medical Malpractice and Healthcare Law

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Cassel v. Superior Court (2013) 51 Cal.4th 113: Successfully obtained reversal of adverse rulings by the trial court
    Court of Appeal regarding the admissibility of mediation communications offered in professional liability action. The California Supreme Court rules that California's mediation confidentiality statutes are to be applied broadly,
    that all mediation communications are inadmissible
    not subject to discovery.
    Baudino v. SCI California Funeral Services, Inc. (2008) 169 Cal.App.4th 773: Obtained summary judgment for commercial client against allegations of fraud, unfair business practices,
    violation of federal pricing
    consumer notice guidelines (16 Code Fed. Reg. 453.1 - 453.9),
    obtained affirmance of the summary judgment on appeal.
    Brutocao v. The Hunt Club Community Assoc. (G037266) 2008 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1717: Defended homeowners' association against claims of fraud
    breach of fiduciary duties established in homeowners' association CCRs when homeowner alleged he was treated unequally in Board's decision regarding design of common area amenities.
    Furla v. Jon Douglas Co. (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 1069: Defended real estate agent in dispute over erroneous appraisal
    claimed misrepresentations arising from inconsistent st
    ards for measuring the square footage of houses under California law. Incomplete release language in a form real estate purchase contract creates liability for misrepresentations by real estate professionals during sale negotiations that would normally be barred in a properly drafted contract.
    WSHB's Epic Win: Appellate Victory in Contentious Litigation
    4.11.23
  • Additional Links
    https://www.wshblaw.com/attorney/stephen-m-caine/

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1985, California
    United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    United States District Court for the Central District of California
    United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
    United States District Court for the Southern District of California
    United States District Court for the Northern District of California
    Memberships
    Los Angeles County and American Bar Associations
    Association of Southern California Defense Counsel.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Pepperdine University School of Law
    Class of 1985
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Indiana University
    Class of 1982
    B.S.
    Legal Certifications
    Certified Specialist, Appellate Law, The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization

Email Stephen M. Caine

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Stephen M. Caine was admitted in 1985 to the State of California.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Stephen M. Caine is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, United States District Court for the Central District of California, United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, United States District Court for the Northern District of California and United States District Court for the Southern District of California.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman LLP has 500 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Stephen M. Caine attended Pepperdine University School of Law.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman LLP was established in 1997.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions