Cases
Experience: REPRESENTATIVE LITIGATION EXPERIENCE: Complex And Multidistrict Litigation: Litton Systems v. Honeywell
Defended
Honeywell: for over 11 years in this complex patent dispute, resulting in a 3-month patent infringement jury trial-the largest patent case in U.S. history at the time. The technology involved thin film physics, laser optics,
materials science. Following trial, the Court declared Litton's patent invalid
overturned a $1.2 billion jury verdict, thus enabling Honeywell to continue its inertial navigation systems business. Following rem
from the U.S. Supreme Court, the court granted summary judgment in Honeywell's favor on all remaining claims,
the Federal Circuit affirmed that no patent infringement had occurred, effectively ending the patent case after 11 years. Reported at Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc., No. CV 90-4823 MRP (Ex), 1995 WL 366468 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 1995)
Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc., No. CV 90-4823 MRP (Ex), 1996 WL 634213 (C.D. Cal. July 24, 1996)
Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc., 87 F.3d 1559 (Fed. Cir. 1996)
Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc., 118 F.3d 747 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
Honeywell, Inc. v. Litton Systems, Inc., 520 U.S. 1111 (1997)
Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc., 140 F.3d 1449 (Fed. Cir. 1998)
Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc., 145 F.3d 1472 (Fed. Cir. 1998)
Litton Systems, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc., 238 F.3d 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2001).
Gillette M3Power Advertising Class Actions
Defended
Gillette: in seven class actions before several U.S. District Courts. The plaintiffs asserted false advertising claims arising out of performance assertions in advertising for Gillette's M3Power razor. Those cases, along with 23 similar class actions filed around the country, were eventually transferred to the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts for consolidated multidistrict litigation (MDL) proceedings. Reported at In re M3Power Razor System Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation, Nos. 05-11177-DPW, 05-12336-DPW, 2007 WL 128846 (D. Mass. Jan. 11, 2007).
In re The Gator Corporation Software Trademark & Copyright Litigation
Defended
Gator: (ska Claria) in a multidistrict litigation (MDL) action in Atlanta, involving permission-based pop-up Internet advertising delivered to consumers targeted at interests exhibited through web-surfing behaviors. The plaintiffs (UPS, Wells Fargo, Hertz, L.L. Bean, TigerDirect, Holiday Inn Hotels, Overstock.com, LendingTree, PriceGrabber,
others) argued that the delivery of pop-up ads to consumers' home computer monitors, even when those consumers agreed to receive such ads, infringed the plaintiffs' trademarks
copyrights
constituted unfair competition. Reported at The Hertz Corporation v. The Gator Corporation, 250 F. Supp. 2d 421 (D.N.J. 2003)
In re The Gator Corporation Software Trademark & Copyright Litigation, 259 F. Supp. 2d 1378 (J.P.M.L. 2003).
University of Southern California, University Gateway Development, Urban Partners v. Conquest Student Housing
Defended
Conquest Student Housing: in ten lawsuits with USC, developer Urban Partners, financier Blackstone Group,
Los Angeles property owners. USC
Urban asserted RICO, antitrust,
tort claims, arguing that Conquest, by filing objections with the City
the courts to a planned development USC wanted to build across the street from the University, was unlawfully interfering with their business. Conquest filed an anti-SLAPP motion to strike directed at USC's attempt to try to bar Conquest
the public from exercising their First Amendment right to petition the City, the courts,
the public about development projects that arguably violated environmental, health
safety, zoning, or other restrictions.
Starz Entertainment v. Buena Vista Television
Defended
Buena Vista Television (Walt Disney Company): in a breach of contract action arising out of its electronic sell-through of Disney films through Apple's iTunes service. Starz asserted such sales breached its decades-long license agreement with Buena Vista, which gave Starz the right to exhibit Disney films through Starz' subscription-based pay television services.
Ultimate Fighting Championship v. Dream Stage Entertainment (Pride FC)
Represented
Dream Stage:, a Japanese company staging mixed martial arts bouts in international arenas. Negotiated pay-per-view agreements, worked with the California Athletic Commission to get new MMA rules enacted in California,
represented Dream Stage in disputes with UFC.
Fresno Madera Farm Credit v. Open Solutions
Represented
FMFC:, an agricultural credit association regulated by the Farm Credit Administration, in breach of contract, fraud, breach of warranty,
unjust enrichment claims against a software systems developer that provided data processing services to financial service providers.
Boyle v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Digital Domain
Defended
Twentieth Century Fox:
Digital Domain:, an Academy Award -winning special effects house, in a patent infringement suit over the special effects in the film Titanic.
Northrop Grumman v. Siemens Audiologische Technik, Siemens Hearing Instruments, GN Resound, Oticon, Phonak, Widex Hearing Aid, et al.
Represented
Northrop Grumman: in a multi-party patent infringement action against the leading hearing aid manufacturers.
Tavarua Isl
Resort, Fiji
Represented
Tavarua Isl
Resort:, the world's top surf destination, in dealings with the Fijian government concerning access to the famous Cloudbreak reef
in a dispute with a shareholder for misappropriation of company assets
breach of his duty of loyalty to the company.
Michelle Pfeiffer, S
ra Bullock, Cameron Diaz, Diane Keaton, M
y Moore, Kate Hudson v. Systemax, TigerDirect, CompUSA, Hewlett-Packard, Westinghouse Digital, Lenovo, Acer, Gateway, Logitech, et al.
Represented the defendants against right of publicity claims asserted by
Michelle Pfeiffer, S
ra Bullock, Cameron Diaz, Diane Keaton, M
y Moore,:
Kate Hudson: arising from the use of movie stills showing characters these actors played in various films, to advertise the sale of home entertainment products.
Constitutional Law: Human Rights Defense Center v. County of Los Angeles
Defended the
County of Los Angeles:,
Sheriff McDonnell:,
the
Men's Central Jail: against
First Amendment:
Civil R: ights: claims asserted by a prisoner rights organization that claimed the County was censoring mail addressed to inmates. Defeated the request for a preliminary injunction
obtained a dismissal of claims. Reported at Human Rights Defense Center v. County of Los Angeles, No. CF-17-4883-R, No. CV 17-4883-R, 2017 WL 6523442 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 25, 2017)
Human Rights Defense Center v. County of Los Angeles, No. CV 17-4883-R, 2017 WL 10402603 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2017).
Lennar Homes v. Community Redevelopment Agency
Represented
Lennar: against a Redevelopment Agency concerning a conflict between the
Reserved Powers Doctrine:
the
Contracts Clause: . The tension between those provisions created a problem when, after creating vested rights through an enforceable development agreement, a municipality enacted ordinances purportedly rendering the development unlawful.
CLP Investment v. United States of America
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Represented a developer in an
Equal Protection: violation action against the U.S.
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers concerning bad-faith
discriminatory conduct in connection with repeated
pretextual refusals to confirm that a residential project proposed by the developer complied with flowage easements
related rights in favor of the U.S.
Brad Pitt v. Playgirl
Defended a magazine in a
First Amendment:
Right to Privacy: case following its republication of nude photographs of
Brad Pitt:
Gwyneth Paltrow: taken by a paparazzo while they were on vacation, which others had previously published in European tabloids.
Jose Solano v. Playgirl
First Amendment:
Right to Privacy.: A former Baywatch actor sued because client
Playgirl: had used his headshot in an article (which included no nudity) about ten male actors in Hollywood
used his publicity still on the cover. The actor argued he suffered a privacy invasion because the magazine's content placed him in a false light. The Court granted judgment in favor of the magazine
ordered the actor to pay its attorneys' fees. That decision, however, then was reversed
rem
ed in Solano v. Playgirl, 292 F.3d 1078 (9th Cir. 2002), after which the case settled.
Jennifer Aniston v. Man's World Publications
Defended magazines in a
First Amendment, Right to Privacy:,
right of publicity case filed by
Jennifer Aniston: over the publication of a topless photograph, ending in a settlement on the first day of trial.
People v. Martin Scorsese, Universal/MCA Pictures, Cineplex Odeon
Represented
Martin Scorsese, Universal/MCA,:
Cineplex Odeon: in
First Amendment: cases, successfully blocking attempted censorship of the 1988 film The Last Temptation of Christ under blasphemy, picketing, obscenity,
other laws.
Microsoft Corporation v. CNET News.com
Defended
CNET: in a
First Amendment:
Journalist's Privilege: dispute over Microsoft's attempt to discover the identity of confidential sources who obtained
Bill Gates': e-mail files.
Dennis Price v. County of Los Angeles
Defended the
County of Los Angeles: against claims that curfew orders issued for public safety shortly after George Floyd's death in May 2020 violated the plaintiff's First Amendment right to speak by prohibiting him from protesting at night, his freedom of movement under the Privileges
Immunities Clause,
his Fourteenth Amendment right of due process. The Court held that the curfew orders were made necessary for the protection of life
property in an emergency, expired by their own terms, were not likely to be reinstated, did not have a disparate impact on any particular part of the community,
did not unduly interfere with any First Amendment right as the curfew was only in effect at night, leaving twelve daylight hours free for anyone to still engage in protests. The Court found no Article III case or controversy
dismissed the case with prejudice.
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. County of Los Angeles
Defended the
County of Los Angeles: against claims by tobacco manufacturer R.J. Reynolds that the County's ordinance banning the sale of flavored tobacco products, including menthol-flavored products, was preempted by the federal Tobacco Control Act of 2009. The Court found that the County's ordinance was not preempted by federal law
fell within the right of local governments to regulate the sale of tobacco products for public health
other local concerns. The Court rejected R.J. Reynolds' request for a preliminary injunction, rejected R.J. Reynolds' motion for summary judgment,
granted the County's motion to dismiss the case, with prejudice. Reported at R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al. v. County of Los Angeles, et al., No. CV 20-4880 DSF (KSx), 471 F. Supp. 3d 1010 (C.D. Cal. 2020). Currently on appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 20-55930.
Copyright: Luvdarts v. AT&T Mobility, Verizon Wireless, Sprint Spectrum, T-Mobile
Defended
Sprint: in a suit by Luvdarts, creator of audiovisual greeting cards. Luvdarts asserted that the wireless carrier industry committed vicarious
contributory copyright infringement by providing the means for peer-to-peer delivery of MMS content. It argued that the carriers had a duty
the ability to supervise infringement over their networks, failed to implement a digital rights management system to prevent infringement,
induced, caused, or contributed to infringement by consumers using those networks. Sprint
the other carriers successfully moved to dismiss. The Ninth Circuit affirmed. Reported at Luvdarts LLC v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
et al., No. CV 10-05442 DDP (RZx), 98 U.S.P.Q.2d 1277 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2011), affirmed, Luvdarts, LLC v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
et al., 710 F.3d 1068 (9th Cir. 2013).
Mondane v. Screen Gems, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Rainforest Films
Streat v. Rainforest Films, Sony Pictures Entertainment
Defended
Screen Gems, Sony,:
Rainforest: in two copyright infringement
idea submission cases, one over the 2007 film, Stomp The Yard,
the other over the 2005 film, The Gospel.
Classic Concepts v. Pier 1 Imports
Defended
Pier 1 Imports: in copyright infringement suits over the design of kilims
other home decorating products sold by Pier 1.
iKindi v. STW Fixed Income Management
Represented
STW: in copyright
breach of contract claims against a software systems engineering company that developed software
database management tools for STW.
Trademark: Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Australian Leather, Oygur
Obtained a jury verdict in favor of Deckers, the maker of UGG, TEVA, HOKA, SANUK,
other footwear br
s. The defendants made online sales of boots in the U.S. that were indistinguishable from products covered by Deckers' design patents
that were labeled with the term UGG . They argued that ugg was generic in Australia for sheepskin boots
had been generic among surfers in the U.S. in the 1960s
1970s
therefore could not be used by Deckers as a trademark. If successful, the defendants would have wiped out a billion-dollar br
for Deckers. After extensive discovery in Australia
the U.S.
summary judgment in favor of Deckers on various issues, the jury rejected the defendants' arguments
unanimously found them liable for willful infringement
counterfeiting. Reported at Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Australian Leather, et al., No. 16 CV 3676, 2017 WL 365555 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 25, 2017)
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Australian Leather, et al., 340 F. Supp. 3d 1706 (N.D. Ill. 2018)
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Australian Leather, et al., No. 16 CV 3676, 2020 WL 4723980 (N.D. Ill. July 13, 2020). Currently on appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2020-2166.
Scat Enterprises, Inc. v. FCA US LLC
Defendant Fiat Chrysler Automobiles in a trademark infringement action filed by an automotive aftermarket performance parts manufacturer who complained that the Dodge line of iconic muscle cars marketed under the Scat Pack trademark in 1968-71
relaunched in 2013 for Dodge Challenger
Charger models infringed its Scat trademark used for crankshafts, connecting rods,
rotating assemblies. Obtained summary judgment for Fiat Chrysler on all claims. Reported at Scat Enterprises, Inc. v. FCA US LLC, No. CV 14-7995-R, 2017 WL 5896182 (C.D. Cal. June 8, 2017)
Scat Enterprises, Inc. v. FCA US LLC, No. CV 14-7995-R, 2017 WL 5749771 (C.D. Cal. June 8, 2017).
Hasbro, Inc. v. MGA Entertainment
Defended
MGA: (creator of the Bratz dolls) against claims that its Spider-Man & Friends 3-D Memory Match-Up game infringed Hasbro's rights in a card-matching game it had marketed as Memory since 1966. After a 7-day trial, the Court ruled in favor of MGA, finding it had shown (through third-party memory games, dictionaries, encyclopedias, trade publications, testimony from linguists
game experts, patent
trademark records, Hasbro's own use of memory with other products in a generic sense,
other evidence) that, despite Hasbro's 40 years marketing the game, claimed $130,000,000 in sales,
an incontestable trademark registration, the term memory was generic for this type of game
could not function as a trademark. Reported at Hasbro, Inc. v. MGA Entertainment, 497 F. Supp. 2d 337 (D.R.I. 2007).
Research In Motion (BlackBerry) v. Samsung
Defended
Samsung: against trademark infringement claims asserted by RIM, which claimed that Samsung's BlackJack
Black Carbon smartphones infringed RIM's trademark rights in the term BlackBerry .
Griffith Suisse Luxury v. eBay, Inc.
Gianni Versace, SpA
Client
Versace: discovered counterfeit product on eBay traced to Griffith Suisse, a seller operating under aliases out of the Philippines
Australia. Versace
other br
owners notified eBay, which then barred Griffith from eBay. Griffith claimed Versace's actions had cost it $14 million in sales
destruction of its business
sued for defamation, restraint of trade,
interference. After evidence of counterfeiting was discovered, Griffith agreed to never again sell Versace-br
ed products or use its name or marks anywhere in the world.
Al Capp Enterprises v. The Walt Disney Company, ABC
Defended
Disney:
ABC: in a trademark suit filed by the owner of rights to the L'il Abner comic strip against claims that references in the 2001-2004 Lizzie McGuire television series to Sadie Hawkins Day
Sadie Hawkins Dance infringed various trademark rights. Obtained a dismissal of the entire action.
UGG Holdings, Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Koolaburra
Represented
UGG:
Deckers:, manufacturers
sellers of the famous UGG boots, against a sheepskin boots manufacturer who was unlawfully using the mark. The defendant argued that the term ugg was generic for such footwear in Australia
that the doctrine of foreign equivalents thereby m
ated invalidation of UGG's trademark rights in the U.S. Obtained summary judgment, thereby defeating a genericness attack on the famous UGG trademark. Reported at UGG Holdings, Inc. v. Severn, et al., No. CV 04-1137 JFW (FMOx), 2004 WL 5458426 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2004)
UGG Holdings, Inc. v. Severn, et al., No. CV 04-1137 JFW (FMOx), 2005 WL 5887187 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2005).
Fuel Design v. Fox Extreme Sports Network
Fuel Clothing Company v. Fuel TV
Defended
Fox Cable: in two trademark suits filed by companies using the name Fuel (one a broadcast design company
the other an action sports clothing company) who complained about Fox's new 24/7 action sports network, Fuel TV.
Right Of Publicity: Arnold Schwarzenegger, Bruce Willis, Denzel Washington v. Fry's Electronics
Defended
Fry's:, a consumer electronics retailer, in a right of publicity suit filed by
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Bruce Willis:,
Denzel Washington:, who claimed that the use of movie stills showing characters from the films Collateral Damage (Schwarzenegger), Hart's War (Willis),
John Q (Washington) in depictions of televisions in newspaper ads promoting the sale of DVDs of the actors' films infringed the actors' rights.
Arnold Schwarzenegger v. Best Buy, Lions Gate Entertainment
Defended
Lions Gate: in a right of publicity claim filed by
Arnold Schwarzenegger: . Best Buy advertised the sale of the Terminator 2 DVD, released by Lions Gate. Best Buy used a movie still from the film in depictions of television monitors in advertisements.
Brad Pitt, Jennifer Aniston v. Casa Damiani
Defended
Damiani:, an Italian jewelry house, against right of publicity claims by
Brad Pitt:
Jennifer Aniston: over their wedding jewelry, which Pitt claimed to have designed
Damiani produced.
Chris Cornell, et al. [ Audioslave ] v. Miller Brewing Company, Young & Rubicam
Rivers Cuomo, et al. [ Weezer ] v. Miller Brewing Company, Young & Rubicam
Defended
Miller Brewing: in right of publicity
false endorsement suits filed by the b
s
Audioslave:
Weezer: over an advertisement in Rolling Stone magazine celebrating 50 years of rock history. The ad's background consisted of a collage of many ticket stubs for rock shows covering a 32-year time span, of which two were for Audioslave
Weezer shows.
Catherine Zeta-Jones v. Caudalie, Neiman Marcus, Turnberry Estates
Defended
Caudalie:, a French cosmetics company, in a right of publicity
false designation of origin suit filed by
Catherine Zeta-Jones: arising from Caudalie's reference in marketing materials to reports Zeta-Jones had purchased
used Caudalie products.
Noah Johnson v. Hurley International
Defended
Hurley,: the designer
wholesaler of HURLEY br
clothing, against right of publicity, breach of contract,
false endorsement claims asserted by one of Hurley's sponsored professional surfers. Prevailed after a full trial. Reported at Johnson v. Hurley International, 77 Fed. Appx. 412 (9th Cir. 2003).
Zooey Deschanel v. Kohl's Department Stores
Defended
Kohl's: against right of publicity claims asserted by actress
Zooey Deschanel: concerning a line of shoes created by Steve Madden for Kohl's called the Zooey style shoe.
Trade Secret: Quarterdeck Office Systems v. Wollongong
Represented
Quarterdeck: against former employees who misappropriated software code for an Internet browser. Conducted a search
seizure of the purloined software in conjunction with law enforcement agencies who raided the offices of the competitor to whom the former employees had brought the stolen software.
Litton Systems v. Sundstr
Defended
Sundstr
: against trade secret misappropriation claims involving ring laser gyroscope-based inertial navigation systems for aircraft.
McDonnell Douglas v. Northrop
Defended
Northrop: against trade secret misappropriation claims involving misappropriation of technology used for the avionics
graphic user interfaces for the F-18 fighter aircraft.
Sysco Food Services
Harbor Truck Bodies
Represented
Sysco:
Harbor: in separate actions involving managers
executives who left with company trade secrets
moved to their chief competitors.
Patent: Water Fun Products v. Proslide Technology
Obtained summary judgment of non-infringement in favor of defendant
Proslide: . The plaintiff asserted patent infringement over a particular design for a funnel-like water slide commonly found at water amusement parks. Reported at Water Fun Products Corp. v. Proslide Technology, Inc., No. CV 04-9041 RSWL (CWx), 2005 WL 6219200 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2005)
Water Fun Products Corp. v. Proslide Technology, Inc., No. CV 04-9041 RSWL (CWx), 2006 WL 5720347 (C.D. Cal. July 6, 2006).
Litton Systems v. Honeywell (described above)
Boyle v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Digital Domain (described above)
Northrop Grumman v. Siemens Audiologische Technik, Siemens Hearing Instruments, GN Resound, Oticon, Phonak, Widex Hearing Aid, et al. (described above)
Other Media, Entertainment Cases: Lutz v. Rakuten Baseball, Inc.
Rakuten, Inc.
Defended
Rakuten Baseball:
its parent
Rakuten:
Rakuten's
CEO: against fraud
promissory estoppel claims. In 2014, the Tohoku Rakuten Golden Eagles, a professional baseball club in Japan, hired Zach Lutz from the New York Mets to play for the Eagles' 2014 season. He only played 15 games before he was injured. He returned to the U.S. for surgery
then started negotiations for the 2015 season. Those proceeded to near-completion, pending receipt of an all-clear medical report showing his recovery. Lutz, however, never provided that report
the Eagles decided to pass on him. Lutz asserted that the defendants should be subject to personal jurisdiction in Pennsylvania because Rakuten is at the apex of a global ecosystem that targets consumers all over the globe, including in Pennsylvania. The Court rejected that argument
dismissed the claims against Rakuten
its CEO for lack of personal jurisdiction. Lutz then dismissed his claims against Rakuten Baseball. Reported at Lutz v. Rakuten, Inc., et al., 376 F. Supp. 3d 455 (E.D. Pa. 2019).
Flying Mallard Productions, Gurney, Delaney v. ESPN
Defended
ESPN: in a trademark, idea submission,
right of publicity suit filed by two actors over ESPN's prime-time reality series, Totally Hooked, which the plaintiffs alleged appropriated their ideas
format for a series, Fish On!, earlier aired by ESPN. Defeated an injunction aimed at barring the airing of the series.
Abraham v. Lancaster Community Hospital
Represented a
hospital director: in a l
mark defamation
judicial proceedings privilege case. Abraham v. Lancaster Community Hospital, 217 Cal. App. 3d 796 (1990).
KDN Sports, Don Nomura
Represented
KDN Sports:
its sports agent
Don Nomura: in connection with antitrust, defamation,
RICO claims arising out of contracts with Dominican
Japanese baseball players (
Hideo Nomo, Robinson Checo, Alfonso Soriano,:
others)
attempts by the U.S. Commissioner of Baseball to keep them from playing in the U.S.
(Playboy Playmate) v. (Manager)
Represented a
Playboy Playmate: in a dispute with her music
business manager
her efforts to terminate that relationship.
Steinberg Moorad & Dunn, Inc. v. David Dunn, Athletes First
Defended
agent
manager defendants: against RICO, breach of contract,
trade secret claims filed by Leigh Steinberg's sports agency against employees who left the agency to set up a competing agency. Obtained summary judgment in favor of the defendants on the trade secret claim. Reported at Steinberg Moorad & Dunn, Inc. v. Dunn, et al., CV 01-07009 RSWL (RZx), 2002 WL 31968234 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 26, 2002)
Steinberg Moorad & Dunn, Inc. v. Dunn, et al., 136 Fed. Appx. 6 (9th Cir. 2005).
Counseling: Advertising Advice
Counseled
Fox Sports, Fuel TV, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, MillerCoors, Gillette, ESPN, Herbalife, 3 Day Blinds, FrameStore, USBank, Cisco, advertising agencies:,
many others in connection with proposed or already published advertising, aimed at avoiding legal liability or governmental sanctions.
Anti-Piracy Enforcement
Represented
News Corp's Star TV:
others in stopping piracy of its television programming through Internet streaming.
U.S. Olympic Committee
Counseled an internationally recognized client, which had endorsement deals with several athletes who participated in the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games, about avoiding claims from the USOC over allegedly infringing
improperly using USOC trademarks.
Title And Trademark Clearance Analyses And Opinions
Performed numerous title
trademark clearance analyses
litigation avoidance opinions for
Twentieth Century Fox, Fox Cable, Sony Pictures Entertainment, StudioCanal, Focus Features, Overture Films, Batjac Productions, Lions Gate Entertainment:,
many other studios involving broadcast
cable, television, film, website,
digital properties.
Digital Millennium Copyright Act
Advised
Mobile Messenger, Jamdat, Sprint, Samsung:,
many others in the wireless
Internet industries concerning DMCA compliance
safe harbors.
