×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
no photo

Ivan L Tjoe

Not yet reviewed

2029 Century Park E Ste 400 N, Los Angeles, CA 90067-2905

Business And Commercial Litigation, Entertainment, International and 11 more

About Ivan L Tjoe

Ivan L Tjoe is a lawyer practicing business and commercial litigation, entertainment, international and 11 other areas of law. Ivan received a B.A. degree from University of California, Berkeley in 1996, and has been licensed for 27 years. Ivan practices in Los Angeles, CA.

Awards

Peer Reviewed Rated
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by another attorney.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer PR

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Ivan

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Business Law 2
    • Business And Commercial Litigation
    • Corporate Governance/Partnership Disputes
  • Entertainment Law 1
    • Entertainment
  • International Law 1
    • International
  • Intellectual Property
  • Commercial Law 1
    • Contract/UCC
  • Antitrust and Trade Regulation 1
    • Unfair Business Practices
  • Products Liability 1
    • Product Liability
  • Admiralty and Maritime Law 1
    • Maritime and Multimodal Transportation
  • Technology and Science 2
    • Technology
    • Electronics
  • Investments 1
    • Financial Services
  • Sports Law 1
    • Sports
  • Other 1
    • Manufacturing

Practice Details

  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Experience: GIB Services LLC v. International Trade Finance LLC (Sacramento S.Ct. Case No. 31-2010-00080453). Secured summary judgment on behalf of defendant in a $6 million business interference action. Represented Indonesian industrial conglomerate against prominent U.S. defense contractor in a commercial dispute. Obtained an eight (8) figure (confidential) settlement on behalf of client on the eve of arbitration before the ICDR. Represented regional consulting business against the nation's largest wireless voice
    data provider in a commercial dispute. Obtained an eight (8) figure (confidential)settlement on behalf of client. Telemasters, Inc. v. The Vintage Club Master Association (U.S.D.C. Cal. Central District Case No. 05-05139). Co-chaired the trial team that was awarded a sub-million dollar jury verdict in a business
    intellectual property dispute on behalf of a telecommunications company. Represented Foxconn/Hon Hai (the world's largest sub-manufacturer of commercial electronics) in a in a commercial
    trademark dispute. Obtained summary adjudication. Co-authored appellate brief affirming trial court's denial of defendant's SLAPP-Motion filed in a business dispute. ( The Consulting Group, Inc. v. Anderson, 2006 Cal.App. Unpub. Lexis 5011.)
    CalAmp, Corp. v. Air IQ U.S., Inc. ( Ventura S. Ct. Case No. CIV240112). Secured a T.R.O.
    Ex Parte Attachment in the amount of approximately two
    one half (2.5) million dollars against a multi-national telecommunications company that led to expeditious
    favorable settlement on behalf of client.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    Supreme Court of the United States
    1999, California
    USDC: Eastern District of California
    USDC: Northern District of California
    USDC: Eastern District of Texas
    USDC: Central District of California
    US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
    US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    USDC: Southern District of California
    Memberships

    MEMBERSHIPS & ASSOCIATIONS

    •American Bar Association (ABA)
    •Los Angeles County Bar Association
    •Maritime Law Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of California, Hastings College of Law
    Class of 1999
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of California, Berkeley
    Class of 1996
    B.A.
    with honors

Ivan L Tjoe

Not yet reviewed

2029 Century Park E Ste 400 NLos Angeles, CA 90067-2905U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

no photo
Pro
Jerold Fagelbaum
5.0
5
General Practice lawyer
424-359-1804
View Profile
Britany Michelle Engelman
Pro
Britany Michelle Engelman
5.0
22
General Practice lawyer
844-786-4893
View Profile
Yan Goldshteyn
Pro
Yan Goldshteyn
5.0
22
General Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

424-480-5046
View Profile
Gary Alan Dordick
Pro
Gary Alan Dordick
4.6
2
General Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

424-359-1437
View Profile
James J. Finsten
Pro
James J. Finsten
3.0
1
General Practice lawyer
424-478-5582
View Profile

Email Ivan L Tjoe

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Related Lawyers Near You

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions