Sheppard MullinPartner

Derek Richard Havel

About Derek Richard Havel

Derek Richard Havel is a lawyer practicing labor and employment, employee benefits/erisa, labor and employment counseling and 11 other areas of law. Derek received a B.A. degree from Georgetown University in 1994, and has been licensed for 29 years. Derek practices at Sheppard Mullin in Los Angeles, CA.

Reviews for Derek

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Labor and Employment
  • Other 13
    • Employee Benefits/ERISA
    • Labor and Employment Counseling
    • Employee Hiring/Discipline/Termination
    • Harassment Investigation and Training
    • Wage and Hour Regulations
    • Labor and Employment Litigation
    • Employee Privacy and Defamation
    • Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation
    • Wage and Hour Class Actions
    • Healthcare
    • Financial Services
    • Food and Beverage
    • Retail, Fashion & Beauty

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Sheppard Mullin
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Recent Significant Client Wins: Williams vs. St. Joseph Health Personal Care Services, Inc., Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 30-2020-01134268. Defeated class certification on behalf of St. Joseph Health Personal Care Services in a putative class action brought on behalf of all California personal care attendants alleging failure to reimburse for business expenses
    improper rounding.
    Hern
    ez vs. St. Jude Medical Center, Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 30-2019-01086516. Prevailed on motion for summary judgment on behalf of St. Jude Medical Center in class
    PAGA action brought on behalf of all non-exempt employees alleging improper wage statements.
    Coordinated Union Bank Wage Hour Cases, Second District Court of Appeal, Case No. B295835
    Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. JCCP4866. Defeated class certification on behalf of Union Bank in class action alleging off-the-clock work, improper rounding
    meal
    rest period violations, brought on behalf of all non-exempt employees in California. Denial of class certification was affirmed on appeal.
    David vs. Queen of the Valley Medical Center, 51 Cal.App.5th 653 (2020)
    Napa County Superior Court, Case No. 26-67321. Prevailed on motion for summary judgment on behalf of Queen of the Valley Medical Center in a putative wage
    hour class action alleging off-the-clock work, meal
    rest period violations,
    improper rounding. Affirmed in full on appeal.
    Guerrero vs. Whole Foods Market, Second District Court of Appeal, Case No. B305799
    Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. 19STCV02239. Prevailed on motion for summary judgment on behalf of Whole Foods Market in an age
    race discrimination,
    wrongful termination case. Affirmed on appeal.
    Willis vs. Driltek, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal, Case Nos. 17-17397, 17472
    U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:15-cv-00688. Prevailed in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal, which affirmed the district court's summary judgment order in a wage
    hour class
    collective action alleging a joint employer relationship between sub-contractors.
    Gerard vs. Orange Coast Memorial Medical Center, Supreme Court of the State of California, Case No. S241655. Prevailed in a unanimous decision in the California Supreme Court, affirming the Court of Appeal ruling that voluntary meal period waivers are permissible for healthcare employees who work shifts of more than 12 hours. Case was fought through California courts for over 10 years, beginning with defeat of class certification in case originally involving meal period, rest period, pay stub, final pay, regular pay
    reimbursement violations in 2013. This was the only wage
    hour victory for an employer before the California Supreme Court in 2018.
    Cruz vs. Whole Foods Market, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC592895. Prevailed on motion for summary judgment on behalf of Whole Foods Market in a putative wage
    hour class action alleging meal
    rest period violations, off-the-clock work, overtime violations, failure to reimburse business expenses, pay stub violations
    failure to pay vested vacation, brought on behalf of all non-exempt employees in California.
    Sumo vs. Torrance Memorial Medical Center, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC530934. Defeated class certification of a putative class action alleging the failure to pay overtime due to invalid alternative work week schedules,
    failure to provide meal periods due to invalid waivers.
    Garcia vs. Whole Foods Market, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC582010. After a six-day jury trial, Whole Foods prevailed with a complete defense verdict in a sex, sexual orientation
    racial harassment, failure to prevent harassment
    intentional infliction of emotional distress case.
    Lampe vs. Queen of the Valley Medical Center, 19 Cal.App.5th 832 (2018)
    Napa County Superior Court, Case No. 26-61568. Defeated class certification of a putative class action alleging various wage/hour violations, including unpaid overtime, meal
    rest period violations
    pay stub violations, for all non-exempt employees. Affirmed on appeal.
    Payne vs. Whole Foods Market, Ventura Superior Court, Case No. 56-2014-00452544. Prevailed on summary judgment in pregnancy discrimination case.
    King vs. Pomona Valley Medical Center, Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. BC351095. Prevailed on summary judgment in a putative class action alleging unpaid overtime on behalf of 12-hour employees.
    Cherin vs. Dignity Health, San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-08-471761. Defeated class certification of proposed class of tens of thous
    of nurses alleging wage
    hour violations.
    Cunningham vs. Long Beach Memorial, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC421688. Prevailed on summary judgment in a putative class action alleging unpaid overtime on behalf of 12-hour employees.
    Rivera vs. Whole Foods Market, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. LC090604. After a week-long jury trial, Whole Foods prevailed with a complete defense verdict in a sexual harassment, retaliation
    wrongful termination claim.
    Leon vs. Union Bank, Ventura County Superior Court, Case No. 56-2010-00386548. Prevailed on summary judgment in a disability discrimination
    retaliation claim.
    McCoy vs. Saddleback Memorial Medical Center, Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 30-2008-00116393. Defeated class certification of proposed wage
    hour class action, including meal
    rest period claims.
    Union Bank Class Action, San Francisco County Superior Court, Case No. CGC-10-499595. Failure to provide meal
    rest periods
    overtime violations. Class certification was denied on lack of adequacy
    typicality for plaintiff,
    partial summary judgment was granted.
    White vs. Whole Foods Market, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC380974. Two-week jury trial of a pregnancy discrimination
    wrongful termination claim. Complete defense verdict.
    Oberfoell vs. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC332075. Prevailed on motion for summary judgment in proposed wage
    hour class action, including overtime
    meal
    rest period claims.
    Sullivan vs. Kelly Services, Inc., U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Case No. C 07-2784. Prevailed on motion for summary judgment in proposed wage
    hour class action alleging failure to pay final wages to temporary agency employees at the end of each assignment.
    Zumbowicz vs. HASC, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC360399. Prevailed on motion for summary judgment on behalf of Memorial Health System in antitrust class action alleging underlying labor code violations. Affirmed on appeal.
    Hamilton vs. Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC322076. Prevailed on motion for summary judgment in proposed wage
    hour class action, including overtime
    pay stub claims. Affirmed on appeal.
    Matlin vs. Tilly's, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC322422. Defeated class certification
    prevailed on summary judgment in proposed wage
    hour class action, including overtime
    meal
    rest period claims.
    McDonnell vs. Whole Foods Market, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC323344. Defeated class certification
    prevailed on summary judgment in proposed wage
    hour class action, including meal
    rest period claims.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1997, California
    All California Courts
    U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
    U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
    Ninth Circuit
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of California, Los Angeles
    Class of 1997
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Georgetown University
    Class of 1994
    B.A.
    magna cum laude

Derek Richard Havel

Partner at Sheppard Mullin
Not yet reviewed

350 South Grand Avenue, 40th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90071U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Derek T. Smith
Pro
Derek T. Smith
4.2
Labor and Employment lawyer

Free Consultation

William J. Ingalsbe
Pro
William J. Ingalsbe
5.0
Labor and Employment lawyer
Matt D. Resnik
Pro
Matt D. Resnik
4.9
Labor and Employment lawyer

Free Consultation

Robert Steven Span
Pro
Robert Steven Span
5.0
Labor and Employment lawyer
Marcelo A. Dieguez
Pro
Marcelo A. Dieguez
4.9
Labor and Employment lawyer
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: