About Bijan Esfandiari

Bijan Esfandiari is a pharmaceutical product liability litigation attorney and senior partner at Wisner Baum in Los Angeles. Since joining the firm in 2007, Bijan has worked as lead counsel on several cutting-edge pharmaceutical and medical device cases. His legal work has helped thousands of clients secure compensation for their injuries and shaped the law for the benefit of those harmed by dangerous drugs and medical devices.

Bijan spent the first five years of his legal career as a defense attorney at a major national law firm. While working on a variety of cases spanning multiple disciplines, including entertainment law, intellectual property, and toxic torts, he became discontented with representing corporate polluters. Recalling that he went to law school to help those who were harmed by the greed and neglect of others, Bijan left the defense firm and joined Baum Hedlund (now Wisner Baum), where he immediately found a committed group of lawyers and colleagues that shared his dedication to helping people harmed by corporate malfeasance.

Bijan has successfully represented clients in state and federal courts across the nation at both the trial and appellate level in wrongful death and catastrophic personal injury cases. Utilizing the discovery process, he has fought to de-designate internal corporate documents demonstrating that pharmaceutical manufacturers intentionally concealed dangers associated with their products simply to maintain sales and profits. In a noteworthy case against drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Bijan obtained, examined, and presented evidence to the Court, which later ruled that: “internal GSK documents suggest that Defendant acted with a wanton and willful disregard for the safety of its consumers…Given such evidence, Plaintiffs may be able to establish at trial that Defendant knew of the risks of pediatric use of its drug yet failed to warn solely to increase the commercial profitability of Paxil.” The ruling allowed Bijan’s clients to proceed with claims for punitive damages and resulted in a successful resolution of the case.

Bijan routinely works on challenging cases for severely injured clients that other law firms refuse to represent due to the costs and legal hurdles. His efforts have not only helped these clients that other attorneys turned away; they also led to precedent-setting legal rulings that have benefited all plaintiffs and consumers.

Many of these precedential successes came in the form of defeating pharmaceutical and medical device companies’ claims that they are immune (preempted) from liability by virtue of their products being approved by the FDA. In 2014, Bijan successfully briefed and argued the first and only medical device preemption case at the time before the Maryland Court of Special Appeals. In an issue of first impression, the three-judge panel in McCormick v. Medtronic, Inc., 219 Md. App.485, unanimously agreed with Bijan’s arguments that the device manufacturer was not entitled to immunity and held that the plaintiff could proceed with his claims against the medical device manufacturer. This appellate success led to thousands of other similarly injured plaintiffs being able to successfully bring and maintain claims against the device manufacturer.

In a similar proceeding, Bijan successfully briefed and argued the first drug preemption case before the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The three-judge panel in Mason v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 596 F.3d. 387 unanimously agreed with Bijan’s arguments, finding that plaintiffs’ claims against the drug manufacturer were not preempted by federal law.

The significance of these and other landmark rulings cannot be overstated. They ensure that drug and medical device companies that engage in deceptive or impermissible conduct are not entitled to immunity and that they can be held accountable in a court of law for any injuries they or their products cause to consumers.

Aside from obtaining substantial monetary recoveries for his clients, the cases Bijan and his colleagues have worked on helped give the public and medical community a chance to learn more about previously undisclosed risks associated with drugs, devices, and products. In multiple instances, his casework helped lead to labeling changes or dangerous products being removed from the market to prevent consumers and patients from suffering harm.

The son of an infectious disease scientist, Bijan was surrounded by members of the medical community from a young age. In addition to the joy he receives from representing and obtaining justice for his clients, a favorite part of Bijan’s legal practice is that it allows him to learn from some of the world’s leading medical experts in their respective fields, retained in the pharmaceutical and medical device cases he handles.

 

Awards

Reviews for Bijan Esfandiari

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating

Services

Areas of Law

  • Personal Injury 1
    • Wrongful Death
  • Products Liability 1
    • Drug and Medical Device Litigation
  • Class Actions
  • Torts 1
    • Mass Torts
  • Consumer Law 1
    • Consumer Fraud
  • Other 3
    • Catastrophic Injury
    • Complex and Multi-District Litigation
    • Product Liability

Practice Details

  • Languages
    Farsi
    English
  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
    Fixed fees available
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Senior Partner
    Firm Name
    Wisner Baum
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Hricik v. Stryker Biotech, LLC, 89 F. Supp. 3d 694 (E.D. Pa. 2015) (granting plaintiff’s motion to rem
    the case back to state court) Boutte v. Stryker Biotech, LLC, 67 F. Supp. 3d 732, 734 (M.D. La. 2014) (denying defendant’s motion to dismiss
    permitting plaintiff to proceed with his products liability claims against medical device manufacturer) McCormick v. Medtronic, Inc., 219 Md. App. 485, 101 A.3d 467 (2014) (unanimously reversing the trial court’s preemption/dismissal ruling
    holding that injured patient’s claims arising out of medical device manufacturer’s off-label promotion of its medical device were not preempted by federal law
    thus allowing plaintiff to proceed with his meritorious claims) Cabana v. Stryker Biotech, LLC et al., Case No. BC465313, 2012 WL 3729227 (Cal.Super. Ct., August 20, 2012) (holding that injured patient’s state law claims arising out of medical device manufacturer’s off-label promotion of its bone morphogenetic protein [Infuse] were not expressly nor impliedly preempted by federal law) Dorsett v. S
    oz, Inc.
    , 699 F.Supp.2d 1142 (C.D.Cal. 2010) (denying defendants’ preemption motion
    holding that both name-br

    generic drug manufacturers have an affirmative duty to issue warnings) Tucker v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 701 F.Supp.2d 1040 (S.D.Ind.2010) (denying defendant’s learned intermediary defense
    further allowing plaintiffs’ experts to testify regarding the causal association between antidepressants
    increased suicidal behavior) Mason v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 596 F.3d 387 (7th Cir. 2010) (unanimously reversing the trial court’s preemption ruling
    allowing plaintiffs’ claims to proceed to a trial on the merits) Forst v. Smithkline Beecham Corp., 639 F.Supp.2d 948 (E.D.Wis.,2009) (holding that plaintiffs’ claims are not preempted by federal law) Forst v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 602 F.Supp.2d 960 (E.D.Wis. 2009) (holding that Wisconsin has not adopted the learned intermediary doctrine
    allowing all of plaintiffs’ claims, including, negligence, fraud
    punitive damages to proceed to the jury) Cunningham v. SmithKline Beecham, 255 F.R.D. 474 (N.D.Ind. 2009) (ordering defendant to produce documents
    awarding sanctions) Knipe v. SmithKline Beecham, 583 F.Supp.2d 602 (E.D.Pa. 2008) (holding that a drug manufacturer owes a duty to warn regarding risks associated with off-label uses
    allowing plaintiffs’ claims for compensatory
    punitive damages to proceed to the jury) Knipe v.SmithKline Beecham, 583 F.Supp.2d 553 (E.D.Pa 2008) (holding that plaintiffs’ claims are not preempted by federal law) Tucker v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 596 F.Supp.2d 1225 (S.D.Ind. 2008) (granting plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration
    holding that plaintiff’s claims are not preempted by federal law) Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC v. Sherwood Partners, Inc. (2005) 131 Cal.App.4th 802
  • Additional Links

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2002, California
    2008, U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    2005, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California
    2008, U.S. District Court, Western District of Michigan
    2008, U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
    2002, U.S. District Court, Central District of California
    2002, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    2013, U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
    2008, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin
    2005, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California
    2009, U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
    2011, U.S. Supreme Court
    2012, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
    Memberships
    State Bar of California Los Angeles County Bar Association American Association for Justice: Leader’s Forum
    Medtronic InFUSE® Litigation Group
    Products Liability Section
    Qui Tam Litigation Group
    STEP-Toxic, Environmental and Pharmaceutical Torts Section Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles Member, UCLA Journal of International Law & Foreign Affairs Contributing Author to The Docket, a UCLA School of Law Publication
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of California, Los Angeles
    Class of 2002
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of California, Los Angeles
    Class of 1999
    B.A.
    cum laude
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1976
    Hobbies & Interests
    Member, Representative Assembly of the Palms Neighborhood Council Public Counsel Volunteer Attorney, 2007

Contact Bijan Esfandiari

Senior Partner at Wisner Baum
5.0
6 reviews

11111 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 1750Los Angeles, CA 90025U.S.A.

Show on map
Fax: 310-820-7444
Office Hours:
  • Monday 08:00 AM - 05:30 PM
  • Tuesday 08:00 AM - 05:30 PM
  • Wednesday 08:00 AM - 05:30 PM
  • Thursday 08:00 AM - 05:30 PM
  • Friday 08:00 AM - 05:30 PM
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Bijan Esfandiari was admitted in 2002 to the State of California.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Bijan Esfandiari is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, United States District Court for the Central District of California, United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, United States District Court for the Southern District of California, United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan and United States Supreme Court.
  • Does this attorney maintain a professional presence on any social networks?
    Yes, Bijan Esfandiari has a professional profile on LinkedIn, Twitter and facebook.
  • Does this attorney speak any other languages?
    Bijan Esfandiari speaks Farsi.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Wisner Baum was established in 1973.