×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLCPartner
David Ludwig

David Ludwig

Not yet reviewed

211 Church St SE, Leesburg, VA 20175 + 5 locations

Copyright Litigation, Internet Law, Patent Litigation and 2 more

About David Ludwig

David Ludwig is a lawyer practicing copyright litigation, internet law, patent litigation and 2 other areas of law. David received a degree from Sonoma State University in 1997, and has been licensed for 20 years. David practices at Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC in Leesburg, VA and 5 others locations.

David Ludwig (Leesburg, Virginia)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

David Ludwig got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for David

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Internet Law
  • Government Contracts
  • Other 3
    • Copyright Litigation
    • Patent Litigation
    • Trademark Litigation

Practice Details

  • Languages
    English
  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates: $350 - $425/hr
    Fixed fees available
    Accepted Credit Cards
    American Express
    Discover
    MasterCard
    Other - QuickFee
    Visa
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    United States ex rel. Carter v. Halliburton Co., 710 F.3d 171 (4th Cir. 2013)
    Arrington v. E.R. Williams, Inc., 490 Fed. Appx. 540 (4th Cir. 2012)
    Newtech Research Sys. LLC v. United States, 468 Fed. Appx. 985 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
    Gustitus v. Fenty, 232 Fed. Appx. 2 (D.C. Cir. 2007)
    Carik v. United States HHS, Civil Action No. 12-272 (BAH), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168714 (D. D.C. Nov. 27, 2013)
    Dougherty v. Advanced Wings, LLC, No. 1:13-cv-447, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110801 (Aug. 7, 2013)
    Cont'l Transfert Technique Ltd. v. Fed. Gov't of Nig., 932 F. Supp. 2d 153 (D. D.C. 2013)
    Batt v. Manchester Oaks Homeowners Ass'n, Case No. 1:12-cv-433 (AJT/TRJ), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38027 (E.D. Va. Mar. 19, 2013)
    Hayes v. FM Broad. Station Wett, 930 F. Supp. 2d 145 (D. D.C. 2013)
    EPOS Techs. Ltd. v. Pegasus Techs. Ltd., 916 F. Supp. 2d 88 (D. D.C. 2013)
    Oracle Am., Inc. v. Serv. Key, LLC, Case No: C 12-00790 SBA, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 171406 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2012)
    Modis, Inc. v. Infotran Sys., Inc., 893 F. Supp. 2d 237 (D. D.C. 2012)
    Titan Atlas Mfg. v. Sisk, 894 F. Supp. 2d 754 (W.D. Va. 2012)
    Turner v. Digital Broad. Corp., Civil Action No. 7:10-cv-00559, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1416 (W. D. Va. Jan. 5, 2012)
    New York Studio, Inc. v. Better Bus. Bureau of Alaska, 39 Media L. Rep. 2297 (W.D. Wa. 2011)

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2006, Virginia
    2007, District of Columbia
    2013, Maryland
    2011, U.S. Supreme Court
    2007, U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    2008, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
    2011, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    2013, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    2011, U.S. Court of Federal Claims
    2012, U.S. Tax Court
    2007, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
    2007, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia
    2007, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
    2011, U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
    2013, U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland
    2007, U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
    2008, U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Virginia
    2007, U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia
    2013, U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland
    2014, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
    2014, Georgia
    Memberships
    American Bar Association
    Virginia Bar Association
    D.C. Bar Association
    Maryland Bar Association.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    George Washington University Law School
    J.D.
    Thurgood Marshall Scholar

    George Washington University Law School
    J.D.
    Merit Scholar
    Other Education
    Sonoma State University
    Class of 1997
    B.A. Philosophy

    Naropa University
    Class of 2001
    M.A. Religious Studies

    George Washington University Law School
    Class of 2006
    Thurgood Marshall Scholar

    George Washington University Law School
    Class of 2006
    Merit Scholar

David Ludwig

Partner at Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC
Not yet reviewed

211 Church St SELeesburg, VA 20175U.S.A.

Show on map

Blackwell House Guildhall YardLondon EC2V 5AEEngland

Show on map

151 Calle San FranciscoSan Juan, PR 00901U.S.A.

Show on map

2911 Turtle Creek Boulevard, Suite 300Dallas, TX 75219U.S.A.

Show on map

2810 Crossroads Drive, Suite 4000Madison, WI 53718U.S.A.

Show on map

2815 Elliott Avenue, Suite 100Seattle, WA 98121U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Kevin T. Oliveira
Pro
Kevin T. Oliveira
2.9
1
Copyrights lawyer
571-609-6992
View Profile
Lee E. Berlik
Pro
Lee E. Berlik
4.6
56
Copyrights lawyer
771-240-1167
View Profile

Email David Ludwig

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions