×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Tully Rinckey, PLLCPartner
Michael W. Macomber

Michael W. Macomber

Not yet reviewed

1203 Troy-Schenectady Road, Suite 101, Latham, NY 12110

Employment Law, Federal Employment Law, Whistleblower Representation and 2 more

About Michael W. Macomber

Michael W. Macomber is a lawyer practicing employment law, federal employment law, whistleblower representation and 2 other areas of law. Michael received a B.A. degree from Union College, and has been licensed for 16 years. Michael practices at Tully Rinckey, PLLC in Latham, NY.

Michael W. Macomber (Latham, New York)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Michael W. Macomber got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Michael W. Macomber

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Military Law
  • Other 3
    • Employment Law
    • Federal Employment Law
    • Whistleblower Representation

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Tully Rinckey, PLLC
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Mott v. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (January 2018) (Court reversed-in-part Merit Systems Protection Board ruling supporting Agency's decision to remove
    demote a Supervisory Medical Administration Specialist for failing to properly perform duties
    failure to perform duties in a timely manner,
    rem
    ed case back to MSPB to review the adverse action).
    Horneman v. Department of Veterans Affairs, Merit Systems Protection Board, No. DE-4324-15-0102-I-1 (March 2016) (Agency ordered to retroactively promote appellant going back to 2007 to compensate him for the denial of promotion based on his military service).
    Wright v. Jamestown, Index No. K1-2007-2805 (2014) (Jury verdict in plaintiff's favor finding that City willfully denied plaintiff vacation time in violation of USERRA dating back to 2003).
    Wang v. New York State Department of Health, 2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 23143 (New York Supreme Court, Albany County, Feb. 19, 2013) (In discussing the anti-discrimination provisions of USERRA
    New York State military law, Court properly denied summary judgment as working in a workplace free of pervasive or severe discrimination is a right or privilege of employment).
    Hibler v. Department of the Army, Merit Systems Protection Board, No. SF-0752-17-0656-I-1 (April 2018) (Agency ordered to cancel the removal
    to retroactively restore the appellant effective August 18, 2017, as well as award appellant back pay
    benefits).

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2010, New York
    2009, Massachusetts
    Naval Marine Court of Criminal Appeals
    United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
    United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Western District of New York, Southern District of New York and Central District of Illinois
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Albany Law School
    Class of 2009
    J.D.
    cum laude
    Other Education
    Union College
    B.A.
    with a concentration in English literature and a minor in German

    University of Massachusetts
    Graduate Certificate in Foundations in Business

Michael W. Macomber

Partner at Tully Rinckey, PLLC
Not yet reviewed

1203 Troy-Schenectady Road, Suite 101Latham, NY 12110U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

no photo
Pro
Kevin P. Burke
4.7
19
Labor and Employment lawyer

Free Consultation

838-667-3778
View Profile
Christine M. Napierski, Esq.
Pro
Christine M. Napierski, Esq.
4.3
1
Labor and Employment lawyer

Free Consultation

518-971-8552
View Profile
Shawn F. Brousseau, Esq.
Pro
Shawn F. Brousseau, Esq.
4.6
28
Labor and Employment lawyer

Free Consultation

518-640-7971
View Profile
Thomas J. O'Connor, Esq.
Pro
Thomas J. O'Connor, Esq.
5.0
1
Labor and Employment lawyer

Free Consultation

518-845-0233
View Profile
John W. VanDenburgh, Esq.
Pro
John W. VanDenburgh, Esq.
5.0
24
Labor and Employment lawyer

Free Consultation

518-608-2114
View Profile

Email Michael W. Macomber

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • Is this attorney admitted to the bar in more than one state?
    Yes, Michael W. Macomber is admitted to practice in Massachusetts and New York.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Michael W. Macomber is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
  • Is this attorney Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review rated?
    Yes, Michael W. Macomber has a 4.9 Peer Rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Tully Rinckey, PLLC has 31 attorneys at this location.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Tully Rinckey, PLLC was established in 2005.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions