×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Elizabeth W. Fleming, AttorneyMember
Elizabeth W. Fleming

Elizabeth W. Fleming

1.0
1 review

104 Center Ave. Suite 201A, Kodiak, AK 99615-1068

Federal Government Contracts, Civil Forfeiture, Capital Offenses and 9 more

About Elizabeth W. Fleming

Elizabeth W. Fleming is a lawyer practicing federal government contracts, civil forfeiture, capital offenses and 9 other areas of law. Elizabeth received a B.A. degree from University of Georgia in 1978, and has been licensed for 45 years. Elizabeth practices at Elizabeth W. Fleming, Attorney in Kodiak, AK.

Elizabeth W. Fleming (Kodiak, Alaska)

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Elizabeth W. Fleming got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Elizabeth

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
1.0
See All Reviews
1
1.0
Lawyers.com
1
4.8
Martindale
5
Avvo
Not yet reviewed
Showing 1-1 of 1 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
0%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
100%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
1.0
Quality of Service
1.0
Responsiveness
1.0
Value for Money
1.0
Criminal Law
Posted by anonymous
May 26, 2020
Hired Attorney

If you are appointed her as counsel by the state, she will not put any time into your defense. She will just try to convince you of taking whatever offer is given by the d.a.. it is a shame what has happened to our country's judicial system, especially in kodiak. Her unprofessional behavior and practices will catch up to her. We, the people , have to hold ourselves accountable for allowing the poor to have their rights violated.

 
From the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network

Services

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law 2
    • Federal Criminal Law
    • Felonies
  • Litigation 1
    • Civil Litigation
  • Family Law 2
    • Divorce
    • Child Custody
  • Military Law
  • Other 6
    • Federal Government Contracts
    • Civil Forfeiture
    • Capital Offenses
    • Criminal Appeals
    • Criminal Fraud
    • Criminal Defense

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Member
    Firm Name
    Elizabeth W. Fleming, Attorney
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    In re Phillip A. Brooks, 383 F.3d 1036 (D.C. Cir. 2004)
    Stevenson v. Union Pacific RR, 354 F.3d 739 (8th Cir. 2004)
    United States v. Kasler, 123 F.3d 341 (6th Cir. 1997)
    United States v. Cohen, 946 F.2d 430 (6th Cir. 1991)
    also reported at 1991 Copr.L.Dec. ¶ 26,773
    21 U.S.P.Q. 2d 1036
    33 Fed.R. Evid.Serv. 1025
    Cobell v. Norton, D.D.C., various decisions 2001-2004 including 283 F.Supp.2d 66 (2003)
    310 F.Supp.2d 77 (2004)
    310 F.Supp.2d 102 (2004)
    220 F.R.D. 106 (2004)
    United States v. Cawley, 821 F. Supp. 1219 (E.D.Mich. 1993)
    also reported at 26 Fed.R.Serv.3d 654
    83 Ed. Law Rep. 146
    County of Oakl
    v. Vista Disposal, Inc.
    the United States, 826 F. Supp. 218 (E.D.Mich. 1993)
    840 F. Supp. 75(E.D.Mich. 1993)
    875 F. Supp. 410 (E.D.Mich. 1995)
    900 F. Supp. 879 (E.D.Mich. 1995)
    Appeal of Trans-World Optics, Inc., ASBCA 35976, 89-3 BCA ¶ 21,895
    Appeal of Daniels & Shanklin, ASBCA 37100, 37101, 89-3 BCA ¶ 21,928
    ASBCA 37102, 89-3 BCA ¶ 21,932
    ASBCA 37103, 37104, 89-3 BCA ¶ 22,056
    ASBCA 37102, 89-3 BCA ¶ 22,060
    Appeal of Walsky Construction Company, ASBCA 37752, 90-3 BCA ¶ 23,092
    Appeal of Conquest Industries, Inc., ASBCA 38738, 90-3 BCA ¶ 23,090
    Appeal of M & T, ASBCA 38128, 90-3 BCA ¶ 23,091
    Appeal of BMY, a Division of Harsco, ASBCA 36805, 93-2 BCA ¶ 25,684
    Transactions
    Represented Microsoft in copyright and trademark litigation in federal courts in Virginia, Maryland and D.C.; Represented the State of California defending False Claims Act allegations pursued by the Department of Justice; Represented shipping giant CMA CGM in obtaining a Temporary Restraining Order in the Eastern District of Virginia; Represented political appointee in the "Indian Trust Fund" matter.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1981, Georgia
    1988, U.S. Supreme Court
    1992, Michigan
    1998, U.S. Court of Federal Claims
    1999, District of Columbia
    2005, Missouri
    2009, Alaska
    Memberships
    American Bar Association (Former Co-Chair, Public Contract Law Section's Legislative Coordinating Committee and Procurement Fraud Committee
    Member, Criminal Justice Section, White Collar Committee)
    Women' Bar Association of District of Columbia (Former Co-Chair, Litigation Forum)
    Board of Contract Appeals Bar Association (Board Member, 2003-2007)
    National Contract Management Association
    Dead ASPR Society
    The Barristers, Washington, DC.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Georgia
    Class of 1981
    J.D.
    Philosophy

    University of Georgia
    Class of 1981
    J.D.
    magna cum laude

    The Judge Advocate General's School
    Class of 1988
    LL.M.
    Government Contracts
    Other Education
    University of Georgia
    Class of 1978
    B.A.
    Philosophy

    University of Georgia
    Class of 1978
    B.A.
    magna cum laude
  • Military Service
    Combat Veteran, Operation Iraqi Freedom
    Active Duty Mobilization and Deployment to Operation Iraqi Freedom, 2005-2007
    Active Duty, U.S. Army Judge Advocate General's Corps, 1981-1990
    U.S. Army Reserves, 1990-2011
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1957
    June 8, 1957
    Hobbies & Interests
    Love living in Kodiak; enjoy hiking and mountain climbing, movies, good conversation, the Georgia Bulldogs football team, the Detroit Red Wings, and my Cairn Terrier, Rollo.

Email Elizabeth W. Fleming

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions