×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Crowley Fleck PLLPPartner
Danielle Coffman

Danielle Coffman

Not yet reviewed

1667 Whitefish Stage Road, Suite 101, Kalispell, MT 59901

Business Organizations, Commercial Litigation, Creditors' Rights & Bankruptcy and 10 more

About Danielle Coffman

Danielle Coffman is a lawyer practicing business organizations, commercial litigation, creditors' rights & bankruptcy and 10 other areas of law. Danielle received a B.A. degree from University of Kansas in 1997, and has been licensed for 24 years. Danielle practices at Crowley Fleck PLLP in Kalispell, MT.

Danielle Coffman (Kalispell, Montana)

Awards

Peer Reviewed Rated
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by another attorney.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer PR

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Danielle Coffman

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Litigation
  • Other 11
    • Business Organizations
    • Creditors' Rights & Bankruptcy
    • Healthcare
    • Healthcare Litigation
    • Intellectual Property & Technology
    • Intellectual Property & Technology - Commercial
    • Medical Malpractice Defense
    • Pro Bono
    • Professional negligence, including medical malpractice
    • Real Property Foreclosures & Landlord-Tenant Disputes
    • Tort Litigation

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Crowley Fleck PLLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Herden v. McCone County Federal Credit Union -- lender liability jury trial - defense verdict
    Kalispell Aircraft Company v. Jones - breach of contract jury trial - verdict in favor of client on all claims including counterclaims
    Farago v. Clark -- medical malpractice jury trial - defense verdict
    Winslow v. St. Johns Lutheran Hospital -- medical malpractice jury trial - defense verdict
    Stephens v. Nickisch et al -- medical malpractice jury trial - defense verdict
    Bissell v. Wells Fargo -- lender liability jury trial - defense verdict
    Oakwood v. Yellowstone Bank -- lender liability jury trial - defense verdict
    Reported Decisions / Cases: Fed. Nat. Mortgage Ass'n v. Taves, 2016 MT 109N, 2016 WL 2664739
    Whipple v. Mann Mortgage, LLC, No. CV 13-188-M-DWM, 2014 WL 1404901, at *1 (D. Mont. Apr. 10, 2014)
    Durnam v. Bank of Am., N.A., 2014 MT 32N, 2014 WL 465882 (Table)
    Myers v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, No. CV 13-53-M-DWM-JCL, 2013 WL 6231715, at *1 (D. Mont. Dec. 2, 2013)
    Feller v. First Interstate Bancsystem, Inc., 2013 MT 90, 369 Mont. 444, 299 P.3d 338
    Myers v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, No. CV 13-53-M-DWM-JCL, 2013 WL 3994250, at *1 (D. Mont. Aug. 5, 2013)
    Blixseth v. Brown, 470 B.R. 562 (D. Mont. 2012)
    Schroeder v. Bank of Am., LLC, No. CV 12-132-M-DLC-JCL, 2013 WL 1876788, at *1 (D. Mont. May 2, 2013)
    Mitchell v. Suntrust Asset Funding, LLC, No. CV 12-127-M-DLC, 2012 WL 5287072, at *1 (D. Mont. Oct. 23, 2012)
    McPherson v. United States, 673 F. Supp. 2d 1167, 1169 (D. Mont. 2009)
    In re Ins. Brokerage Antitrust Litig., No. CIV 04-5184 GEB, 2007 WL 1062980 (D.N.J. Apr. 5, 2007)
    OPTi Inc. v. nVidia Corp., No. CIV.A.2:04-CV-377TJW, 2006 WL 1133331, at *1 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 24, 2006)
    Fener v. Gallagher, No. 04 C 8093, 2005 WL 2234656, at *1 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 8, 2005)
    Leto v. RCA Corp., 355 F. Supp. 2d 921 (N.D. Ill. 2004)

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2001, Illinois
    2007, U.S. District Court, District of Montana
    2007, Montana
    2001, Wisconsin
    Memberships

    Professional Affiliations

    Northwest Montana Bar Association (President 2016-17)
    State Bar of Montana
    Illinois State Bar Association
    Wisconsin State Bar Association
    American Bar Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Wisconsin-Madison
    Class of 2001
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Kansas
    Class of 1997
    B.A.
    History and French, with honors
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1975
    1975

Email Danielle Coffman

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions