×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Watkins & EagerMember
Joseph G Baladi

Joseph G Baladi

Not yet reviewed

400 East Capitol Street, Jackson, MS 39201

Construction, Construction Claims and Disputes, Construction Litigation and 13 more

About Joseph G Baladi

Joseph G Baladi is a lawyer practicing construction, construction claims and disputes, construction litigation and 13 other areas of law. Joseph received a B.B.A. degree from Millsaps College in 1989, and has been licensed for 26 years. Joseph practices at Watkins & Eager in Jackson, MS.

Joseph G Baladi (Jackson, Mississippi)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Joseph G Baladi got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Joseph

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Construction Law 1
    • Construction Litigation
  • Litigation
  • Professional Liability
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Other 12
    • Construction
    • Construction Claims and Disputes
    • Healthcare
    • Healthcare Litigation
    • Professional Liability - Medical Practitioners
    • Mass Tort and Repetitive Exposure
    • Toxic Tort and Chemical and Environmental Exposure
    • Pharmaceutical and Medical Device
    • Product Liability
    • Lawsuits & Disputes
    • Consumer Products
    • Class Action

Practice Details

  • Languages
    Arabic
  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Member
    Firm Name
    Watkins & Eager
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Cases: Eldridge v. University of Mississippi Medical Center, 251-09-910 (Hinds Cnty. Cir. Ct. 2012) (defense verdict)
    Pierce v. American Optical Corp., 2012-73-CV7 (Jones Cnty. Cir. Ct. 2013) (defense verdict)
    Armstrong v. American Optical Corp., 2011-189 (Claiborne Cnty. Cir. Ct. 2013) (defense verdict)
    Wachter v. American Optical Corp., 2012-0038 (Washington Cnty. Cir. Ct. 2013) (client voluntarily dismissed with prejudice before last defense witness put on the st
    .)
    Banks v. American Optical Corp., 251-12-201 (Hinds Cnty. Cir. Ct. 2014) (defense verdict)
    Parks v. Altcon, Inc ., 161 F. Supp. 2d 645 (M.D.N.C. 2001) (summary judgment granted in case involving pharmaceutical clinical trial)
    Langston v. Pangborn Corp., et al. 2014 WL 347718 (S.D. Miss. Jan. 31, 2014) (summary judgment granted in silica case on statute of limitations)
    Clanton v. 3M Company, et. al., 251-12-720 (Hinds Cnty. Cir. Ct. 2014) (summary judgement granted in silica case on design defect
    failure to warn)

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2000, Missouri
    2001, Mississippi
    Memberships

    Community & Professional

    •Defense Research Institute
    •Mississippi Defense Lawyers Association
    •St. Joseph Catholic School Board
    •The Mississippi Bar

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Arkansas at Little Rock
    Class of 1999
    J.D.
    with high honors
    Other Education
    Millsaps College
    Class of 1989
    B.B.A.

    Millsaps College
    Class of 1992
    M.B.A.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1967
    West Lafayette, Indiana, 1967

Joseph G Baladi

Member at Watkins & Eager
Not yet reviewed

The Emporium Building400 East Capitol StreetJackson, MS 39201U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Michael R. Brown
Pro
Michael R. Brown
4.9
17
Construction Law lawyer

Free Consultation

601-769-8482
View Profile
Rogen K. Chhabra, Esq.
Pro
Rogen K. Chhabra, Esq.
3.6
8
Construction Law lawyer

Free Consultation

601-368-6767
View Profile
Darryl M. Gibbs, Esq.
Pro
Darryl M. Gibbs, Esq.
4.3
15
Construction Law lawyer

Free Consultation

601-586-0217
View Profile
no photo
Pro
Gene D. Berry
4.9
3
Construction Law lawyer
769-312-1355
View Profile

Email Joseph G Baladi

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions