AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Conley Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).
Practice Area
Reviews
More Filters
Sort by
Language
Years Established
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Conley Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer ... Learn More
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Conley Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).

The Greaves Law Group LLC

  • 235 Peachtree St., Ste. 400, Atlanta, GA 30303

The Dhanani Law Firm, LLC

  • 3355 Lenox Rd., Ste. 750, Atlanta, GA 30326

Saul Legal

  • 301 Washington Avenue, Marietta, GA 30060

Your legal solution starts here.

Get professional advice by contacting an attorney today.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Gibson Law Firm, LLC

  • 1979 Lakeside Pkwy., Ste. 180, Tucker, GA 30084

The Gonzalez Law Firm, LLC

  • 2256 Northlake Pkwy., Ste. 300, Tucker, GA 30084

Hector R Cora & Associates LLC

  • 1770 Indian Trail Road, Ste. 190, Norcross, GA 30093

Law Office of Noah M. Roth

  • 2066 Lavista Rd. N.E., Atlanta, GA 30329

Holland & Knight LLP

  • 1180 W. Peachtree St., N.W., Atlanta, GA 30309

Lawyers At This Firm

Jackson Lewis P.C.

  • 171 17th Street, NW, Atlanta, GA 30309-3600

Lawyers At This Firm

Layne Law Group

  • Atlanta, GA 30357

Hoffer & Webb, LLC

  • 3190 Northeast Expressway, Suite 430, Atlanta, GA 30341

Lawyers At This Firm

Joseph A. Roseborough, P.C.

  • 3695 Cascade Rd., Ste. F - PMB F-308, Atlanta, GA 30331

Law Office of Truong P.C.

  • Atlanta, GA 30362

The Hendrix Law Firm, P.C.

  • 209A Swanton Way, Decatur, GA 30030

Frank Marquez, P.C.

  • 305 Lawrence St., Marietta, GA 30060

Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith LLP

  • 1180 Peachtree St., N.E., Ste. 2900, Atlanta, GA 30309

Lawyers At This Firm

Law Offices of Jay I. Solomon

  • 900 Circle 75 Pkwy., Ste. 1350, Atlanta, GA 30339-3095

Tannen Law Group LLC

  • 6455 E Johns Crossing, Suite 425, Johns Creek, GA 30097

Jonathan S. Ware, Esq.

  • 145 15th St. N.E., Ste. 601, Atlanta, GA 30309

Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.

  • 945 E. Paces Ferry Rd. N.E., Ste. 2700, Atlanta, GA 30326-1380

Lawyers At This Firm

T. Ade. Adeboye & Associates, P.C.

  • 244 S. Fairground St., S.E., Marietta, GA 30060

SternLaw

  • 1100 Spring Street NW, Suite 400, Atlanta, GA 30309

Lunel Law

  • 1201 W Peachtree St., Ste. 2340, Atlanta, GA 30309

Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP

  • 1180 W. Peachtree St. N.W., Ste. 2300, Atlanta, GA 30309-3482

Lawyers At This Firm

Boakye-Danquah, LLC

  • 1532 Dunwoody Village Pkwy., Dunwoody, GA 30338

Jonap & Associates

  • Atlanta, GA 30359

Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC

  • 3414 Peachtree Rd., N.E., Ste. 1600, Atlanta, GA 30326-1164

Lawyers At This Firm

The Gledhill Law Firm, LLC

  • 2759 Delk Rd., Ste. 2120, Marietta, GA 30067

Law Office of Chae H. An LLC

  • 3301 N. Berkley Lake Rd., Duluth, GA 30096

Piccarreto Law Firm PC

  • P.O. Box 2197, Duluth, GA 30096

Ask a Lawyer

Additional Resources

About our Immigration Lawyers Ratings

The average lawyer rating is created by peers based on legal expertise, ethical standards, quality of service, and relationship skills. Recommendations are made by real clients.

CLIENT RECOMMENDED
73 %

1178 Client Reviews

PEER REVIEWS
4.6

23313 Peer Reviews

User Resources

Lawyer Resources

Commonly Asked Immigration Questions From Users Near You

This information is not legal advice and is not guaranteed to be correct, complete or up-to-date. It is provided for general informational purposes only. If you need legal advice you should consult a licensed attorney in your area.

Help with fiance with possible deportation

Alan Lee
Answered by attorney Alan Lee
Immigration lawyer at Alan Lee Arthur Lee, Attorneys at Law
Your fiancé should get himself a good lawyer for the criminal charge as a conviction for domestic violence would bar him forever from the United States. If the charge is dropped or changed to one not  involving domestic violence, he would have the ability to present whatever equities that he has in front of an immigration court as long as he does not already have an order of removal. Even if he has an order of removal in the past or in the future and is removed, you could still marry him and you can both file for waivers of unlawful presence (I-601) and deportation (I-212) while he is in his home country. Hopefully the waiver applications would be approved. Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee, Esq.'s (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.  
Your fiancé should get himself a good lawyer for the criminal charge as a conviction for domestic violence would bar him forever from the United States. If the charge is dropped or changed to one not  involving domestic violence, he would have the ability to present whatever equities that he has in front of an immigration court as long as he does not already have an order of removal. Even if he has an order of removal in the past or in the future and is removed, you could still marry him and you can both file for waivers of unlawful presence (I-601) and deportation (I-212) while he is in his home country. Hopefully the waiver applications would be approved. Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee, Esq.'s (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.  
Read More Read Less

Does my son need to apply I130 and pay filling fee again and how long is the application still valid?

David Nabow Soloway
Answered by attorney David Nabow Soloway
Immigration lawyer at Kennedy, Nalepa & Soloway, P.C.
Generally, a Form I-130 Application for Relative Alien may be filed and approved regardless of whether the beneficiary remains subject to the 10-year bar. Although not clear from your message, I presume that only the consular processing step was denied, and the Form I-130 application remains pending or perhaps has been approved. If you had been represented by an immigration attorney, you could have avoided the costs and waste of time involved in seeking consular processing before you were eligible, and it would be wise to engage an immigration attorney now, who after learning all of the relevant information about you and your immigration history would be able to advise you about the most appropriate steps to take this year to achieve your goals as promptly as possible.
Generally, a Form I-130 Application for Relative Alien may be filed and approved regardless of whether the beneficiary remains subject to the 10-year bar. Although not clear from your message, I presume that only the consular processing step was denied, and the Form I-130 application remains pending or perhaps has been approved. If you had been represented by an immigration attorney, you could have avoided the costs and waste of time involved in seeking consular processing before you were eligible, and it would be wise to engage an immigration attorney now, who after learning all of the relevant information about you and your immigration history would be able to advise you about the most appropriate steps to take this year to achieve your goals as promptly as possible.
Read More Read Less

I-539 denial after the applicants have already left the U.S., how will this affect their B1/B2 VISA and re-enter into U.S.?

Alan Lee
Answered by attorney Alan Lee
Immigration lawyer at Alan Lee Arthur Lee, Attorneys at Law
Your parents and their visas should not be impacted as long as they had timely extensions pending at the time that they left the US. They would be subject to the rules governing visitors on subsequent visits which means that their purpose is only to visit the US for short periods of time and not to stay most of the time in the US and only visit the home country. Subject to that restriction, they should carry proof that they had the extension papers pending and that they maintained legal status in this way in the US before they left. In my opinion, it is not worth submitting motions to reopen or reconsider their cases. Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee, Esq.'s (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.
Your parents and their visas should not be impacted as long as they had timely extensions pending at the time that they left the US. They would be subject to the rules governing visitors on subsequent visits which means that their purpose is only to visit the US for short periods of time and not to stay most of the time in the US and only visit the home country. Subject to that restriction, they should carry proof that they had the extension papers pending and that they maintained legal status in this way in the US before they left. In my opinion, it is not worth submitting motions to reopen or reconsider their cases. Due to the limitations of the Lawyers.com Forums, Alan Lee, Esq.'s (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.
Read More Read Less