Ms. Kimberly Kelley Rucker

Despite clear warning signs early on—including showing up unprepared at our first meeting, missing the initial EEOC submission deadline due to personal reasons, failing to notify me of the delay until I followed up, and consistently poor communication with delayed responses—I ignored my instincts and proceeded with their representation. My impression is they were more interested in a quick payday than providing meaningful advocacy. After the EEOC’s decision not to pursue my case (a common outcome in the majority of filings), RLS chose not to move forward. Importantly, they never requested or reviewed the evidence the EEOC relied upon in its findings. When I obtained that information, I discovered my former employer submitted factually incorrect statements. I informed RLS of this, to include letting them know the EEOC issued my right-to-sue letter, yet they still declined to pursue the case. Ending my opportunity for justice.