×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Andrew M. Dansicker

Andrew M. Dansicker

4.9
5 reviews

11350 McCormick Road, Suite 705, Hunt Valley, MD 21031

Employment and Labor, Americans with Disabilities Act, Employment Contracts and 16 more

About Andrew M. Dansicker

Andrew M. Dansicker is a lawyer practicing employment and labor, americans with disabilities act, employment contracts and 16 other areas of law. Andrew received a B.A. degree from American University in 1989, and has been licensed for 33 years. Andrew practices at Law Office of Andrew M. Dansicker, LLC in Hunt Valley, MD.

Andrew M. Dansicker (Hunt Valley, Maryland)

Awards

Silver Client Champion
This award is granted to attorneys who have received at least 3 client reviews, and have an average review score of 4.0 or higher.
Champion Badge Silver
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Andrew M. Dansicker got this award in 2021

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Andrew M. Dansicker got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Andrew

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
4.9
See All Reviews
5
4.9
Lawyers.com
5
4.4
Martindale
9
Avvo
Not yet reviewed
Showing 1-5 of 5 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
80%
4 stars
20%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
0%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
5.0
Quality of Service
4.8
Responsiveness
4.8
Value for Money
4.8
Employee Benefits
Posted by anonymous
June 15, 2017
Hired Attorney

It's quite rare to find a lawyer that sincerely cares about your best interest. However, Andrew truly resets the stereotype that anyone might have had towards an employment lawyer. He graciously shared his knowledge of the law regarding my circumstances and explained the legal journey before me. This only validated my initial impression of him. He gave me the confidence I needed to be as prepared as possible. His price, attitude and easy to access work ethic made this process smooth.

 
Employee Benefits
Posted by anonymous
February 16, 2012
Hired Attorney

I was represented by Mr. Dansicker in an unemployment case that my former employer contested. He was brilliant and very aggressive at the hearing with the district manager that showed up to represent the employer. Needless to say we won and the employer lost the remaining appeal. Thanks again very much.

Labor and Employment
Posted by anonymous
August 15, 2010
Hired Attorney

Has very responsive staff, knowledgeable and helpful. I have recommended his firm.

Labor and Employment
Posted by anonymous
August 31, 2010
Hired Attorney
Employee Benefits
Posted by anonymous
February 23, 2010
Hired Attorney
From the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network

Services

Areas of Law

  • Labor and Employment 6
    • Americans with Disabilities Act
    • Employment Contracts
    • Family and Medical Leave Act
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Wage and Hour Law
    • Wrongful Termination
  • Litigation 1
    • Civil Litigation
  • Constitutional Law
  • Other 11
    • Employment and Labor
    • Civil Appeals
    • Covenants Not To Compete
    • Confidentiality Agreements
    • Age Discrimination in Employment
    • Employee Drug Testing
    • Executive Severance Contracts
    • Non-compete Litigation
    • Non-competition and Non-Solicitation
    • Restrictive Covenants
    • Retaliatory Discharge

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Member
    Firm Name
    Law Office of Andrew M. Dansicker, LLC
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Abrams v. Lamone, 905 A. 2d 840 (Md. 2006) (constitutional law)
    MaryCLE, LLP v. First Choice Internet, Inc., 166 Md. App. 481 (2006) (commercial litigation)
    Converge Services Group, LLC v. Curran, 383 Md. 462 (2004) (administrative law)
    Friedler v. Cole, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2994 (D. Md. 2005) (civil litigation)
    Harrison v. Grass, 304 F. Supp. 2d 710 (D. Md. 2004) (civil litigation)
    Aravanis v. Somerset County, 339 Md. 644, 664 A. 2d 888 (1995)
    Rogers v. New York City Transit Authority, 643 N.Y.S. 2d 601 (2d Dep't 1996)
    Amos v. Maryl
    Department of Public Safety
    Correctional Services, 126 F. 3d 589 (4th Cir. 1997)
    Wahlstrom v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad, 1998 WL 99799 (S.D.N.Y. March 5, 1998)
    89 F. Supp. 2d 506 S.D.N.Y. 2000)
    Adler v. Pataki, 1998 WL 326748 (N.D.N.Y. June 19, 1998)
    Bainlardi v. SBC Warburg, Inc., 1998 WL 872487 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 1998)
    1998 WL 556032 (S.D.N.Y. Sept 1, 1998)
    Sousa v. Orient Arts, Inc., 1999 WL 147724 (S.D.N.Y. March 16, 1999)
    Rosenberg v. Seattle Art Museum, 70 F. Supp.2d 1163 (W.D. Wa. Oct. 7, 1999)
    White v. Sances, 2001 WL 246076 (4th Circuit, March 13, 2001)
    National City Bank of Minneapolis v. Lapides, 2003 WL 21666571 (D. MD, June 13, 2003).

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1993, Maryland
    1993, U.S. District Court, District of Maryland
    1995, New York
    1996, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
    1998, U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York
    1999, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
    1995, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
    Memberships
    Baltimore City, Baltimore County, New York State and American Bar Associations
    Maryland State Bar Association, Inc.
    Maryland Employment Lawyers Association
    National Employment Lawyers Association (NELA).
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Columbia University
    Class of 1992
    J.D.
    Other Education
    American University
    Class of 1989
    B.A.
    magna cum laude
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1967
    Baltimore, Maryland, November 17, 1967

Andrew M. Dansicker

Member at Law Office of Andrew M. Dansicker, LLC
4.9
5 reviews

Executive Plaza II, 11350 McCormick Road, Suite 705Hunt Valley, MD 21031U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

J. Stephen Simms
Pro
J. Stephen Simms
4.7
3
Labor and Employment lawyer
443-909-3948
View Profile
Eric Lee Pines, Esq.
Pro
Eric Lee Pines, Esq.
4.8
76
Labor and Employment lawyer

Free Consultation

346-326-1461
View Profile
Steven R. Freeman
Pro
Steven R. Freeman
4.7
9
Labor and Employment lawyer

Free Consultation

443-901-5013
View Profile
David D. Nowak, Esq.
Pro
David D. Nowak, Esq.
4.8
29
Labor and Employment lawyer
443-901-4908
View Profile
Francis X. Leary
Pro
Francis X. Leary
4.9
19
Labor and Employment lawyer
443-901-5743
View Profile

Email Andrew M. Dansicker

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions