×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Law Office of Matthew E. CovelerMember
no photo

Mr. Matthew E. Coveler

Not yet reviewed

2640 Talbott St., Houston, TX 77005

Appellate Practice, Products Liability, Litigation and 2 more

About Mr. Matthew E. Coveler

Mr. Matthew E. Coveler is a lawyer practicing appellate practice, products liability, litigation and 2 other areas of law. Matthew received a B.A. degree from Northwestern University in 1996, and has been licensed for 27 years. Matthew practices at Law Office of Matthew E. Coveler in Houston, TX.

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Mr. Matthew E. Coveler got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Matthew

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Appellate Practice
  • Products Liability
  • Litigation
  • Torts
  • Personal Injury

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Member
    Firm Name
    Law Office of Matthew E. Coveler
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Theis v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., No. 03-16- 00266-CV, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 10336 (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 3, 2017) (no pet.) (addressing exclusion of plaintiff’s tire expert’s testimony as unreliable
    no evidence)

    Lee v. Wal-Mart, No. 11-14- 00078-CV, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 2805 (Tex. App. Eastl
    March 17, 2016, no pet.) (addressing summary judgment
    sanction for plaintiffs’ failure to timely disclose expert)

    In re Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 437 S.W.3d 923 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2014, orig. proceeding)
    In re Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., No. 04-16- 00590-CV, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 3676 (Tex. App.—San Antonio April 26, 2017, orig. proceeding) (addressing dem
    s for tire plant inspection)

    Abdullatif v. Erpile, LLC, 460 S.W.3d 685 (Tex. App.—Houston [14thDist.] 2015, no pet.) (addressing subject matter jurisdiction of county courtat law)

    Westside Wrecker Serv., Inc. v. Skafi, 361 S.W.3d 153 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2011, pet. denied) (addressing statute of frauds
    partnership formation issues)

    Tratree v. BP N. Am. Pipelines, Inc., No. 09-20472, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 16932, 390 Fed. Appx. 386 (5th Cir. Aug. 12, 2010) (addressing Title VII race discrimination
    Age Discrimination in Employment Act claims)

    Stanford Dev. Corp. v. Stanford Condo. Owners Ass’n, 285 S.W.3d 45 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, no pet.) (addressing enforceability of arbitration provision)

    MBM Fin. Corp. v. Woodl
    s Operating Co., L.P.    , 292 S.W.3d 660 (Tex. 2009) (addressing recoverability of attorneys’ fees)

    Kehm Oil Co. v. Texaco, Inc., 537 F.3d 290 (3d Cir. 2008) (addressing Petroleum Marketing Practices Act claims
    personal jurisdiction issues)

    TRW Auto. U.S. LLC v. Pap
    opoles    , 949 So. 2d 297 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 4th Dist. 2007) (addressing forum non conveniens issues).

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1999, Texas
    U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas
    U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas
    U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas
    U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas
    U.S. District Court, Colorado
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Memberships
    Houston Bar Association

    State Bar of Texas

    Texas Bar Foundation, Sustaining Life Fellow
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Georgetown University Law Center
    Class of 1999
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Northwestern University
    Class of 1996
    B.A.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1974
    Hobbies & Interests

    Nationally-Certified Porsche Driving Instructor

Mr. Matthew E. Coveler

Member at Law Office of Matthew E. Coveler
Not yet reviewed

2640 Talbott St.Houston, TX 77005U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Ian Scharfman
Pro
Ian Scharfman
4.9
83
Appellate Practice lawyer
832-730-0465
View Profile
Jimmy Joe Ortiz, Jr.
Pro
Jimmy Joe Ortiz, Jr.
5.0
25
Appellate Practice lawyer
346-560-7649
View Profile
Michael D. Hudgins
Pro
Michael D. Hudgins
5.0
1
Appellate Practice lawyer
346-299-8330
View Profile
John T. Floyd
Pro
John T. Floyd
5.0
61
Appellate Practice lawyer
346-601-6287
View Profile
Kevin Douglas Hunter
Pro
Kevin Douglas Hunter
4.7
12
Appellate Practice lawyer
346-586-6503
View Profile

Email Mr. Matthew E. Coveler

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions