×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Case Lombardi A Law CorporationDirector
Mark G. Valencia
Pro

Mark G. Valencia

2.4
1 review

737 Bishop Street, Honolulu, HI 96813

Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution

About Mark G. Valencia

Member, The Barristers. Member, Moot Court Board. Finalist, Texas Young Lawyers Association State Moot Court Competition. Member and Articles Editor, SMU Law Review, 1994-1996. Law Clerk to Honorable Walter Kirimitsu, Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals, 1996-1997. Certified Personal Trainer, American Council on Exercise. Author: "Take Care of Me When I Am Dead: An Examination of American Church-State Development and the Future of American Religious Liberty," 49 S.M.U. Law Review 1579, 1996. Member, American Inns of Court. Participant, Volunteer Legal Services Hawaii. Member, Ethics Committee, Kuakini Medical Center. Volunteer, Read Aloud American Program.

 

Mark G. Valencia (Honolulu, Hawaii) View website

Awards

Peer Reviewed Rated
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by another attorney.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer PR

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Mark G. Valencia

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
2.4
See All Reviews
1
Lawyers.com
Not yet reviewed
2.4
Martindale
1
Avvo
Not yet reviewed

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Director
    Firm Name
    Case Lombardi A Law Corporation
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    WIHC, LLC v. NextGen Labs., Inc., 341 F. Supp.3d 1147 (D. Haw. 2018) (granting preliminary injunction to enjoin misappropriation of trade secrets, a case that later settled for $4.5 million)
    Association of Apartment Owners of Royal Aloha v. Certified Mgmt., Inc., 139 Hawaii 229, 386 P.3d 866 (2016) (as a matter of first impression, holding that laches applies to both legal
    equitable claims)
    Wiesenberg v. University of Hawaii, 138 Hawaii 210, 378 P.3d 926 (2016) (clarifying that time to appeal runs from filing of amended final judgment)
    Hawaiian Ass’n of Seventh-day Adventists v. Wong, 130 Hawaii 36, 305 P.3d 452 (2013) (upholding refusal of circuit court to terminate long-term lease)
    Nazara v. F.R. Log Homes, Inc., 474 Fed. Appx. 517 (9 th Cir. 2012) (upholding district court’s dismissal of breach of contract
    construction defect case)
    Valvanis v. Milgroom, 529 F. Supp.2d 1206 (D. Haw. 2007) (defeated motion to expunge lis pendens in which federal court held as matter of first impression in Hawaii that a lis pendens is proper in a fraudulent transfer action)
    Valvanis v. Milgroom, 529 F. Supp.2d 1190 (D. Haw. 2007) (defeated motion for summary judgment in federal court fraudulent transfer case)
    Mikelson v. United Services Automobile Association, 107 Hawaii 192, 111 P.3d 601 (2005) (successfully defended insurance coverage appeal before Hawaii Supreme Court involving issues of first impression in Hawaii)
    OWBR LLC v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc., 266 F. Supp.2d 1214 (D. Haw. 2003) (obtained summary judgment in federal court on behalf of Fortune 500 company in breach of contract case.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1996, Hawaii
    1996, U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii
    Memberships
    Hawaii State and American Bar Associations.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Southern Methodist University
    Class of 1996
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Hawaii
    Class of 1993
    B.A.
    History
  • Military Service
    Sgt. U.S. Army, 1989-1993

Email Mark G. Valencia

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Case Lombardi A Law Corporation has 26 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Mark G. Valencia attended Southern Methodist University.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Case Lombardi A Law Corporation was established in 1888.
  • Is this attorney listed in the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers?
    Mark G. Valencia is listed in the Business Law, Civil Trial Practice, Land Use Law, Real Estate Law, Trusts and Estates and Wills and Probate section of the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions