Carlsmith Ball LLPPartner

John Pierre Manaut

About John Pierre Manaut

John Pierre Manaut is a lawyer practicing administrative & regulatory, appeals/appellate, construction litigation and 18 other areas of law. John received a B.A. degree from University of Colorado in 1980, and has been licensed for 41 years. John practices at Carlsmith Ball LLP in Honolulu, HI.

Awards

Reviews for John

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
Showing 1-1 of 1 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
100%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
0%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Value for Money
5.0
Litigation
Posted by anonymous
April 18, 2013
Hired Attorney

Good listener and can resolve problems. We had some complicated real estate issues for a construction project with a lender and he was able to get a good court result.

Services

Areas of Law

  • Construction Law 1
    • Construction Litigation
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution 1
    • Arbitration
  • Real Estate
  • Other 18
    • Administrative & Regulatory
    • Appeals/Appellate
    • Environmental Litigation
    • Environmental Practice Group
    • Environmental Regulation & Compliance
    • General Commercial Litigation
    • Historic Preservation & Native Hawaiian Considerations
    • Insurance Coverage Litigation
    • Land Use & Entitlements
    • Land Use Litigation
    • Litigation & Alternative Dispute Resolution
    • Media & Entertainment Litigation
    • Permitting
    • Probate & Trust Litigation
    • Procurement
    • Public Utilities
    • Water Rights
    • Commercial

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Carlsmith Ball LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Construction Litigation/Arbitration: As his primary practice area, he has represented owners, architects, contractors,
    subcontractors in over one hundred actions of varying amounts
    complexity in both arbitration
    lawsuits involving contract, tort, asbestos, mold, mechanics' liens, bond claims
    the Contractor's Repair Act. Selected representative cases include: 1) Represented general contractor in $100 million construction project
    successfully negotiated a multi-million dollar arbitration award against owner on undisbursed retention
    delay claim
    2) Prevailed on summary judgment for dismissal of related $5 million claim against lender to release loan funds
    3) Successfully represented large l
    owner on claims involving applicability of restrictive covenants in deeds filed in L
    Court affecting a multi-million dollar golf course development.
    Commercial
    Residential Real Estate Litigation: Mr. Manaut has h
    led many lawsuits
    arbitrations involving interpretations of Purchase Contract/DROA language
    applicability in disputes involving residential
    commercial lease disputes, quiet title
    disputes over l
    use
    ownership, lender liability
    foreclosure law. Lead lawyer cases include: 1) Represented international accounting firm in complex application of Canadian
    U.S. law on various issues relating to lender liability. Successfully avoided substantial liability exposure
    trial expense in summary judgment
    2) Litigated
    negotiated a defense costs settlement on a $5 million claim against large beer manufacturer by former distributor on wrongful termination
    lost profits claims
    3) Dismissed quiet title action against Japanese developer over conflicting property claims to a $600 million resort development
    4) Full recovery for contractor/developer in lawsuits
    arbitration over disputed partnership share, including multi-million dollar delay
    defect damages defenses.
    LLC/Corporate/Partnership Disputes: Defended general partnership
    corporation in litigation to discharge general partner. Case involved numerous complex partnership
    corporate law issues. Obtained jury verdict as lead counsel in favor of clients in real estate partnership dispute after two month jury trial. Practice also emphasizes disputes involving intellectual property rights
    the resolution of partnership, director
    shareholder litigation
    contract interpretation.
    Government Contracting: 1) Defended general contractor on government utilities contract against $3 million claim for wrongful termination of subcontractor
    lost profits. Analysis of FAR, subcontract
    partnering issues to successfully negotiate a defense costs resolution before trial. 2) Represented sign supplier against general contractor to recover for work performed on airport construction job. Successfully recovered balance on contract as well as a portion of legal fees in settlement after two month trial.
    Toxic Tort/Environmental Litigation: Represented owners
    contractors in numerous mold exposure investigations, remediation
    litigation matters. H
    led numerous disputes on the duties to warn
    remediate environmental risks
    toxic exposure. Represents defendants as lead local counsel in asbestos cases filed in Hawaii
    USDC.
    EIS Litigation: Successfully defended City in EIS process challenge under HEPA
    NEPA in both State Court
    Federal Court.
    Creditor
    Lender Defense: Has h
    led numerous state foreclosures
    defense of federal actions asserting TILA
    FDCPA claims against financial institutions.
    Appellate Work: Has worked on more than 20 appeals involving commercial litigation at state
    federal court levels. Successfully argued appeals before the Hawaii Supreme Court, ICA
    Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
    Representative Cases: Matter of Conservation District Use Application HA-3568, 143 Hawaii 379, 431 P.3d 752 (2018)
    Flores v. BLNR, 143 Hawaii 114, 424 P.3d 469 (2018)
    City & County of Honolulu v. Sherman, et. al, 128 P. 3d 542 (Hawaii 2006)
    Mroz v. Hoalaha Na Eha, Ltd., 360 F. Supp. 2d 1122 (D. Haw. 2005)
    Dannenfelser v. DaimlerChrysler Crop., 370 F. Supp. 2d 1091 (D. Haw. 2005)
    Sensible Traffic Alternatives
    Resources, Ltd. v. Federal Transit Admin. of U.S. Dept. of Transp., 307 F. Supp. 2d 1149 (D. Haw. 2004)
    Cisneros v. Trans Union, LLC, 293 F. Supp. 2d 1156
    1167 (D. Haw. 2003)
    Pannell Kerr Forster Intern. Ass'n. Ltd. v. Quek, 5 Fed. Appx. 574, 2001 WL 180646 (9th Cir. 2001)
    Associates Financial Services Co. of Hawaii, Inc. v. Mijo, 950 P. 2d 1219 (1998)
    In re Herrick, 922 P. 2d 942 (1996)
    Howard Fields & Assoc. v. Gr
    Wailea Co., 848 F. Supp. 890 (D. Haw. 1993)
    Touche Ross, Ltd. v. Filipek, 778 P. 2d 721 (1989)

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1985, Hawaii
    1994, Colorado
    2022, Washington
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii
    Memberships

    Affiliations

    •Hawaii State Bar Association
    •Washington State Bar Association
    •American Bar Association
    •American Arbitration Association Panelist for Commercial and Construction Disputes

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Gonzaga University School of Law, Spokane, Washington
    Class of 1985
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Colorado
    Class of 1980
    B.A.
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: