×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Shapiro Croland Reiser Apfel & Di Iorio, LLPPartner
Stuart Reiser, P.C.
Pro

Stuart Reiser, P.C.

3.7
4 reviews

411 Hackensack Avenue, Hackensack, NJ 07601

Commercial Litigation, Civil Litigation, Arbitration and 9 more

About Stuart Reiser, P.C.

Stuart Reiser, P.C. practices at Shapiro Croland Reiser Apfel & Di Iorio, LLP

Read Full Bio

Stuart Reiser, P.C. (Hackensack, New Jersey) View website

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Stuart Reiser, P.C. got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Stuart Reiser, P.C.

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
3.7
See All Reviews
4
1.0
Lawyers.com
2
Martindale
Not yet reviewed
1.0
Avvo
2
Showing 1-2 of 2 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
0%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
100%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
1.0
Quality of Service
1.0
Responsiveness
1.0
Value for Money
1.0
Commercial Litigation
Posted by anonymous
December 09, 2024
Hired Attorney Stuart Reiser, P.C.

In our initial consultation, Glenn and his brother Stuart promised to build our case and would listen to our concerns and follow our needs by letting us be “in the driver’s seat." Well, it recently came out that Stuart's motto from another review that was left for their firm months ago on Google follows the old adage "a bad settlement is better than a good lawsuit." This certainly was a fitting motto for them as a bad settlement is exactly what they got us.

 
Commercial Litigation
Posted by Ray
December 09, 2024
Hired Attorney Stuart Reiser, P.C.

Stuart didn't live up to his promises during our initial consultation and the day before a settlement hearing he told me the questions that were going to be asked then how I should respond. When I told him I didn't feel that way he said if I didn't do it he'd drop me as a client.

From the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network

Services

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Litigation 1
    • Civil Litigation
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution 1
    • Arbitration
  • Real Estate
  • Other 8
    • Zoning
    • Land Use
    • Environmental Litigation
    • Insurance Coverage
    • Professional Liability Litigation
    • Corporate Transactions
    • Commercial Transactions
    • Entertainment

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Accepted Credit Cards
    American Express
    Discover
    MasterCard
    Visa
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Shapiro Croland Reiser Apfel & Di Iorio, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    FOP v. City of Newark, 216 N.J. Super. 461 (App. Div. 1987)
    National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab, 489 U.S. 656, 109 S. Ct. 1384, 103 L.Ed.2d 685, 49 Empl Prac. Dec. P 38,792, 4 IER Cases 246, 1989 O.S.H.D. (CCH) P 28,589 (U.S. La., Mar 21, 1989)
    Reno Auto v. Prospect Park S & L 243 N.J. Super 624 (App. Div. 1990)
    Irani v. K-Mart, 281 N.J. Super 383 (App. Div. 1995)
    Nat. Realty Counselors v. Tracy, 313 N.J. Super. 519 (App. Div. 1998)
    Steiger v. Lenoci, 323 N.J. Super. 529 (App.Div. 1999)
    PNE Media, LLC v. Cistrone, 741 N.Y.2d 405 (N.Y.A.D. 1st Dept. 2002)
    Cooper v. Tomback, 798 N.Y.S. 2d 708 (N.Y. Sup. 2004)
    Alan Klarik Enterprises, Inc. v. Viva Optique, Inc, 2006 WL 2423552 (Cal. App.2d Dist. 2006)
    Shaler Properties v. Borough of Ridgefield, 2007 WL 3982513 (Law Div. 2007)
    Jersey York Apparel, LLC v. Ronald Platovsky, 2008 WL 2164287 (Ch. Div. 2008)
    St. George's Dragons, LP v. Newport Real Estate Group LLC, 407 N.J.Super. 464 (App.Div. 2009).
  • Additional Links
    https://shapiro-croland.com/ http://www.shapiro-croland.com

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1980, New Jersey
    1980, U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey
    1981, New York
    1981, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
    1981, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
    1982, U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    1987, U.S. Supreme Court
    Memberships
    Bergen County, Passaic County, New Jersey State, New York State and American Bar Associations
    Former Master, Justice Robert L. Clifford American Inns of Court
    Former Chairman, District IIA Fee Arbitration Committee
    Member, International Council of Shopping Centers.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Temple University
    Class of 1980
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Rutgers University
    Class of 1977
    B.A.
    cum laude
    Legal Certifications
    Certified Civil Trial Attorney, Supreme Court of New Jersey, Board on Trial Attorney Certification
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1955
    Brooklyn, New York, December 1, 1955

Contact Stuart Reiser, P.C.

Partner at Shapiro Croland Reiser Apfel & Di Iorio, LLP
3.7
4 reviews

Continental Plaza II, 411 Hackensack AvenueHackensack, NJ 07601U.S.A.

Show on map
Fax: 201-488-9481
Office Hours:
  • Monday 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
  • Tuesday 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
  • Wednesday 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
  • Thursday 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM
  • Friday 08:30 AM - 05:30 PM

Email Stuart Reiser, P.C.

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Stuart Reiser, P.C. is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and United States Supreme Court.
  • Is this attorney Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review rated?
    Yes, Stuart Reiser, P.C. has a 5.0 Peer Rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
  • Does this attorney accept major credit cards?
    Yes, Stuart Reiser, P.C. will accept MasterCard, American Express, Discover and Visa.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Shapiro Croland Reiser Apfel & Di Iorio, LLP has 20 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Stuart Reiser, P.C. attended Temple University.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions

Avvo Client Reviews

Ratings and reviews are feedback from people who have either consulted an attorney about an issue (but may not have hired the attorney) or people who hired an attorney as a current or former client and provided their feedback to our sister site, Avvo.com.