×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
David Charles Buxbaum

David Charles Buxbaum

Not yet reviewed

1 Zhugan Lane, South Chao Nei Avenue Dongcheng District, Beijing 100010, China [2, *]+ 10 locations

Banking Law, Labour and Employment, Mergers and Acquisitions and 13 more

About David Charles Buxbaum

David Charles Buxbaum is a lawyer practicing banking law, labour and employment, mergers and acquisitions and 13 other areas of law. David received a B.A. degree from New York University in 1954, and has been licensed for 56 years. David practices at Anderson & Anderson LLP and 10 others locations.

David Charles Buxbaum (Beijing, )

Reviews for David

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Banking Law
  • Labour and Employment
  • Taxation
  • Real Estate
  • Business Law 1
    • Joint Ventures
  • Commodities
  • Securities
  • Intellectual Property 2
    • Trademarks
    • Copyrights
  • Other 7
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Private International Law
    • Complex International Litigation
    • Complex International Contracts
    • Investment Law
    • Mining Law
    • Patent, Trademarks and Copyrights Protection

Practice Details

  • Languages
    English
    Chinese
    Cantonese
    Korean
    Hebrew
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Managing Partner
    Firm Name
    Anderson & Anderson LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Sole Counsel for Successful Respondents, Butz v. Economou, 438 U.S. 478, 1978
    Counsel for Sole Counsel for Successful Respondents, Butz v. Economou, 438 U.S. 478, 1978
    Counsel for Successful Claimants, Microsoft, AutoDesk
    WordPerfect v. Juren, Beijing Intermediate Court, 1996. Harcourt Brace v. An Hui Press (in China) 1996
    MacMillian v. An Hui Press (in China) 1996
    Microsoft Software v. Haidian Hui Ruan Computer (in China)
    Zhong jing zhi chu zi No. 586, 1994
    AutoDesk v Beijing San Hua Electronic (in China)
    Zhong jing zhi chu zi No. 588, 1994
    Lotus v. Beijing Gao Li Computer (in China)
    Zhong jing zhi chu zi No. 652, 1994
    Novell v. Beijing Gao Li Computer (in China)
    Zhong jing zhi chu zi No. 951, 1994
    Tianjin Corporation v Citibank (Guangzhou) Branch (in China), Guangzhou fashi zi No.36,1993
    Citibank (Shanghai) Branch v. Wafangdian Ballbearing Company (Liaoning, China)
    Da min chu zi di 23 hao, 1998
    Procter & Gamble v. Lu Chaowen, et al, 1993 (criminal case)
    Xian Antai Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. General Motors, 1995 Xiyao Zi No. 186
    Daewoo v. Fushan AIC, 1995
    Yuri Yaguolaev, Credit Card Fraud, 2008
    Dato Mansharove, Shenzhen Custom Problem, 2008
    Haim Zeev Orenstein, Alleged Criminal Case in Guangzhou, 2009
    Japan v. Yosef B
    a, Heisei 20-nen [2008]-(wa) 904, 2010.
    Transactions
    Real estate investment matters including investment in Shenyang, Xianyang, Guangzhou, Shanghai, leases, land transactions, multi-story building transactions; French Metro Engineering Company, in negotiations with Beijing Metro and others for engineering including connecting circular line and direct line in Beijing; Hong Kong corporation in contractual negotiation with Shanghai Metro, including drafting contract and negotiation for initial design work for Shanghai Metro; Representing an American corporation in natural gas project off Hainan in Yinggehai, with contractual negotiations and legal advice; Representing in contractual negotiations and undertaking legal work regarding oil equipment and exploration; Representing European-Israel corporation meetings and negotiations regarding water projects in Shenyang, Zhenxing, Xuzhou, Xinyi City, Nancheng, Beijing and Yangxin, etc.; Representing European Corporation and others in negotiations for Xiamen Dongdu Port and other port projects; Assist Mongolian bank in public offering of bonds on Singapore exchange; Assist American corporations in public offerings; Assist Chinese corporation in due diligence work; Assist Hong Kong corporations in drafting and filing convertible debentures; Assist French engineering corporation negotiations with Xining airport; Assist Chinese airline in leasing aircraft; Assist European Bank in finance lease of Airbus to Mongolia airline; Help established first joint venture insurance company in China; Assist numerous foreign banks in corporate finance activities in China, Mongolia and U.S.A.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1991, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit (Not admitted in China)
    1970, New York
    1981, California
    1974, U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit and U.S. Supreme Court
    1975, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
    1975, U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
    1978, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    1979, U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
    Memberships
    American Bar Association
    International Bar Association
    State of New York
    State of California.
    Bar Fellowship
    Harvard University, 1963.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Michigan
    Class of 1959
    J.D.
    Other Education
    New York University
    Class of 1954
    B.A.

    University of Washington
    Class of 1963
    M.A.

    University of Washington
    Class of 1968
    Ph.D.
  • Military Service
    US Army, Germany, 1954-1956
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1933
    New York, New York, July 1933
    Hobbies & Interests
    Writing on traditional Chinese, Roman, Israel and Common Law comparison

David Charles Buxbaum

Managing Partner at Anderson & Anderson LLP
Not yet reviewed

Suite 601, 6th Floor, Chaoyangmen SoHo Tower1 Zhugan Lane, South Chao Nei Avenue Dongcheng DistrictBeijing 100010China

Show on map

Chamber No 31, Supreme Court of India, Tilak MargNew Delhi 110001India

Show on map

Suite 1621, 16th FloorTower One, Zhonghuan Binjiang, 2742 Pudong Avenue, Pudong New DistrictShanghai 200131China

Show on map

Suite 601, 6th Floor, Chaoyangmen SoHo Tower1 Zhugan Lane, South Chao Nei Avenue Dongcheng DistrictBeijing 100010China

Show on map

20th Floor, AIA Tower, N°251A-301Avenida Comercial DeMacau 999078China

Show on map

Suite 1008, 10th Floor, Grand PlazaEnkhtaivan Ave-46Ulaanbaatar 16052Mongolia

Show on map

Suite 2207, 22nd Floor, Tower Two, Lippo Centre89 Queensway, AdmiraltyHong Kong 999077China

Show on map

30 Wall Street, 8th FloorNew York, NY 10005-2205U.S.A.

Show on map

Suite 600, 10940 Wilshire BoulevardLos Angeles, CA 90071U.S.A.

Show on map

C3, F/3 China Israel Office, No. 123 Hexiang RoadScience and Technology Industrial Zone, West Taihu LakeChangzhou 213145China

Show on map

Suite 2010, 20th Floor, Tower B, Zhong Hang International Communication Center777 Yi Zhou North Road, Gao Xin DistrictChengdu 610041China

Show on map

Email David Charles Buxbaum

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions