×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Stephen George Walko
Pro

Stephen George Walko

Not yet reviewed

170 Mason Street, Greenwich, CT 06840

Litigation, Labor and Employment, Arbitration and 1 more

About Stephen George Walko

Chairman, Board of Estimate and Taxation, Town of Greenwich, Connecticut, 2008.

Stephen George Walko (Greenwich, Connecticut) View website

Reviews for Stephen

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Labor and Employment
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution 1
    • Arbitration
  • Real Estate 1
    • Residential Real Estate

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Member
    Firm Name
    Mandelbaum Barrett PC
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    PNC Bank, N.A. v. Kelepecz, 289 Conn. 692, 9060 A.2d 563 (2008)Healy v. County of Nassau, 18 A.D.3d 873, 796 N.Y.S.2d 377 (2005)County of Nassau v. Civil Service Employees Ass'n, Inc., 14 A.D.3d 509, 789 N.Y.S.2d 63 (2005)In re Herbert, 304 B.R. 67, Bkrtcy. E.D.N.Y. (2004)Thomas v. County of Nassau, 10 A.D.3d 359, 780 N.Y.S.2d 296 (2004)Carter v. County of Nassau, 8 A.D.3d 603, 778 N.Y.S.2d 911 (2004)Civil Service Employees Ass'n, Inc. v. County of Nassau, 5 A.D.3d 480, 772 N.Y.S.2d 567 (2004)Civil Service Employees Ass'n, Inc. v. County of Nassau, 305 A.D.2d 498, 759 N.Y.S.2d 540 (2003)Civil Service Employees Ass'n, Inc. v. County of Nassau, 296 A.D.2d 474, 745 N.Y.S.2d 547 (2002)Bruen v. Nassau County Civil Service Com'n., 294 A.D.2d 361, 741 N.Y.S.2d 718 (2002)Zimmermann v. Associates First Capital Corp., 251 F.3d 376 E.D.N.Y (2001)Civil Service Employees Ass'n, Inc. v. County of Nassau, 284 A.D.2d 532, 727 N.Y.S.2d 325 (2001)Civil Service Employees Ass'n, Inc. v. Town of Hempstead, 284 A.D.2d 532, 727 N.Y.S.2d 325 (2001)Weitzenberg v. Nassau County Dept. of Recreation
    Parks, 282 A.D.2d 741, 724 N.Y.S.2d 357 (2001)Cooke v. City of Long Beach, 281 A.D.2d 478, 721 N.Y.S.2d 784 (2001)Maineri v. Syosset Central School Dist., 276 A.D.2d 793, 714 N.Y.S.2d 763 (2000)Brannigan v. Board of Commissioners of Great neck Park Dist., 273 A.D.2d 231, 709 N.Y.S.2d 115 (2000)Albala v. County of Nassau, 270 A.D.2d 482, 705 N.Y.S.2d 615 (2000).
  • Pro Bono Services

    From 2008 - 2011, Mr. Walko served as Chairman of the Greenwich, CT Board of Estimate and Taxation. He has also served as Chairman of the Representative Town Meeting, Budget Overview Committee and currently serves as Chairman of the Republican Town Committee. From 2011 - 2013, Mr. Walko served as a State Representative in the Connecticut General Assembly, representing the 150th District, Greenwich’s shoreline.

  • Additional Links
    https://mblawfirm.com/professionals/stephen-g-walko/

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1998, Connecticut
    1999, New York
    1999, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
    2008, U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut
    Memberships
    Fairfield County, Greenwich and Connecticut Bar Associations.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    St. John's University
    Class of 1997
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Trinity University
    Class of 1992
    B.A.

Email Stephen George Walko

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Stephen George Walko was admitted in 1998 to the State of Connecticut.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Stephen George Walko is admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut and United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Stephen George Walko attended St. John's University.
  • Does this attorney maintain any other responsibilities in the firm outside of legal work?
    Stephen George Walko is the Managing Partner of the firm.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Mandelbaum Barrett PC was established in 1950.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions