×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Greenberg Traurig, LLPShare Holder
George David Zalepa
Pro

George David Zalepa

Not yet reviewed

500 Campus Drive, Suite 400, Florham Park, NJ 07932

Intellectual Property & Technology, Intellectual Property Litigation, Patents and Innovation Strategies and 1 more

About George David Zalepa

George David Zalepa focuses his practice on intellectual property and technology matters. His experience includes drafting and prosecuting patent applications in fields ranging from computer science to electrical engineering. George has wide-ranging experience in the technology industries including web applications, networking and wireless technologies, cellular and satellite communications, telephony, image processing, and mobile devices and software.

George regularly advises clients on a variety of matters involving technology transactions, including software licensing and IP due diligence in connection with mergers and acquisitions. He has a wide range of experience in the areas of traditional software licensing, VAR agreements, white label agreements, SaaS/PaaS/IaaS agreements, privacy policies, terms of services, strategic alliances, and many other commercial relationships. In addition to prosecution experience, George is an experienced litigator focusing primarily on patent litigation and commercial litigation. He has represented numerous clients in federal district courts throughout the nation both representing patent owners and defendants. In addition to his legal experience, George is an experienced software developer, specifically with web applications. He utilizes that expertise to build and deploy software solutions to augment the firm’s legal expertise and increase the efficiency and productivity of his practice.

After earning his degree in computer engineering from Boston University, where he focused on ASIC and FPGA design, George was a Patent Examiner with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. While at the patent office, he worked in the Processor Architecture and Instruction Processing Art Unit prosecuting technologies including, branch prediction, VLIW and SIMD systems, FPGA architectures and multi-threaded processing.

Concentrations

•Intellectual property litigation
•Patent prosecution
•Technology

The attorney is providing legal services through and affiliated with Greenberg Traurig, LLP, a New York Limited Liability Partnership. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Recognition & Leadership

Awards & Accolades

•Listed, IAM Patent 1000, Prosecution, 2024-2025
•Listed, The Best Lawyers in America, 'Ones to Watch,' 2021-2026
•Intellectual Property Law, 2022-2026
•Litigation - Intellectual Property, 2021-2022, 2026
•Litigation - Patent, 2022, 2026
•Listed, New Jersey Law Journal, 'New Leaders of the Bar,' 2023
•Listed, Super Lawyers magazine, New Jersey Super Lawyers, 'Rising Stars,' 2015-2016 and 2020-2023

 

George David Zalepa (Florham Park, New Jersey) View website

Reviews for George

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 4
    • Intellectual Property & Technology
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Patents and Innovation Strategies
    • Innovation & Artificial Intelligence

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Representative Matters: Tissue Anchor Innovations LLC v. ASTORA Women's Health LLC, No. 2:15-cv-00473 (E.D. Va.) (2015)
    Advanced Media Networks, LLC v. KVH Industries, Inc. et al., No. 1:15-cv-00084 (D. R.I.) (2015)
    Advanced Media Networks, LLC v. Harris CapRock Communications, Inc. et al., No. 8:15-cv-00408 (M.D. Fla.) (2015)
    Advanced Media Networks, LLC v. ViaSat, Inc. et al., Case No. 3:15-cv-00143 (S.D. Cal.) (2015)
    SK Telecom Co., Ltd. v. Viber Media, Inc., Seoul Central District Court [Dist. Ct.], 2013Ga-Hap546931 (2013) (S. Kor.)
    Advanced Media Networks LLC v. Row 44, Inc. et al., No. 2:12-cv-11018 (C.D. Cal.) (2012)
    comScore, Inc. v. Moat, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00351 (E.D. Va.) (2012)
    comScore, Inc. v. DoubleVerify Inc. et al., No. 2:12-cv-00396 (E.D. Va.) (2012)
    Geotag, Inc. v. Burberry Limited, No. 2:12-cv-00443 (E.D. Tx.) (2012)
    Droplets, Inc. v. E*Trade Financial Corp., No. 1:12-cv-02326 (S.D.N.Y.) (2012)
    Advanced Media Networks LLC v. Gogo LLC et al., No. 2:11-cv-10474 (C.D. Cal.) (2011)
    Integren Holdings PTE LTD v. GO800, LLC et al., No. 1:11-cv-03526 (S.D.N.Y.) (2011)
    WebSideStory, Inc., v. NetRatings, Inc., No. 3:06-cv-00408 (S.D. Cal.) (2006)
    The above representations were h
    led by Mr. Zalepa prior to his joining Greenberg Traurig, LLP.
    Previous Experience: Patent Examiner, U.S. Patent
    Trademark Office, 2005-2006
  • Additional Links
    http://www.gtlaw.com/People/George-David-Zalepa

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    New Jersey
    New York
    U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
    U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    New York Law School
    J.D.
    cum laude

    New York Law School
    J.D.
    2012 Online Staff Editor

    New York Law School
    J.D.
    New York Law School Law Review
    Other Education
    Boston University
    Class of 2005
    B.S.
    Computer Engineering

Email George David Zalepa

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    George David Zalepa is admitted to practice before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP has 2750 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    George David Zalepa attended New York Law School.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP was established in 1967.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions