×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Greenberg Traurig, LLPShare Holder
Douglas R. Weider
Pro

Douglas R. Weider

Not yet reviewed

500 Campus Drive, Suite 400, Florham Park, NJ 07932

Intellectual Property & Technology, Technology, Media & Telecommunications and Intellectual Property Litigation

About Douglas R. Weider

Douglas R. Weider has over 30 years of litigation experience with a focus on technology related disputes including patent litigation, trade secret litigation, and post-grant proceedings before the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). A former Bell Labs engineer, Doug’s litigation experiences have included a wide range of technologies including computer systems, content delivery networks, database design, wireless networks, electronic devices, and pharmaceuticals. He has tried dozens of cases before courts, arbitration panels, and the PTAB.

Concentrations

•Patent litigation
•Post-grant proceedings including Inter Partes Review Proceedings (IPRs)
•Trade secret litigation
•Commercial pharmaceutical disputes
•Contractual software development disputes

The attorney is providing legal services through and affiliated with Greenberg Traurig, LLP, a New York Limited Liability Partnership. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Judicial Clerkships

•Hon. Oliver Gasch, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Recognition & Leadership

Awards & Accolades

•Listed, IAM magazine, 'IAM Patent 1000,' Litigation, 2022-2025
•Member, Winning Team, New Jersey Law Journal’s ' General Litigation Department of the Year ' award, 2013
•Team Member, Lexology’s Client Choice Award USA & Canada, United States: New Jersey, 2013

 

Douglas R. Weider (Florham Park, New Jersey) View website

Reviews for Douglas R. Weider

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 3
    • Intellectual Property & Technology
    • Technology, Media & Telecommunications
    • Intellectual Property Litigation

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Litigation Matters: Peloton Interactive, Inc. v. Echelon Fitness Multimedia, et al. Lead patent counsel for the defendants in a consolidated patent infringement case alleging infringement of 4 patents concerning online exercise systems.
    TriPlay, Inc. v. Whatsapp, Inc. Lead counsel for plaintiff in a patent infringement case alleging infringement of 4 patents covering electronic messaging.
    Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. V. Napo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Lead counsel for Glenmark in an 8-day trial before the International Centre for Dispute Resolution in a contract dispute regarding the development
    commercialization of a pharmaceutical product. The Panel found for Glenmark on all grounds.
    Air Express Internations, d/b/a DHL Global Forwarding Corportion v. Log-Net, Inc. Represented Defendant in a commercial dispute involving trade secret misappropriation claims.
    Obtained arbitration ruling that software developer was not entitled to $15 million sought based on evidence that software was not able to perform according to specifications.
    Represented major telecommunications company in a trial overturning a Florida county's tax assessment on telecommunication switches because the switch software was not 'embedded' as defined in the governing statute
    thus not subject to property tax.
    H
    led defense of multimillion-dollar class action suit against a leading desktop computer manufacturer. Testimony established that plaintiffs' alleged performance issues were the result of changes they had made to their own computers, not a common computer defect.
    Represented major consumer electronics company in various patent infringement matters.
    Represented bar code scanner manufacturer in multimillion-dollar patent infringement litigation involving patents directed to digital decoding of bar code scanning signals, optical filtering,
    laser scan pattern generation.
    Represented br
    ed
    generic pharmaceutical companies in ANDA Hatch-Waxman litigations.
    Defended medical imaging equipment manufacturer against theft of trade secret claims.
    Patent Office Post-Grant Review Proceedings: Echelon Fitness Multimedia v. Peloton Interactive, Inc. Lead counsel for petitioner concerning 4 inter partes review petitions regarding patents related to online exercise systems. The PTAB instituted IPRs as to all four patents with two decided in Petitioner's favor
    two dismissed after the parties' settlement.
    WhatsApp, Inc. v.Triplay, Inc. Lead counsel for patent owner concerning patents related to electronic messaging systems.
    Limelight Networks v.Akamai Technologies, Inc. Represented Limelight as petitioner
    patent owner concerning patents related to content delivery networks.
  • Additional Links
    http://www.gtlaw.com/People/Douglas-R-Weider

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    New Jersey
    U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    1998, Connecticut
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    The George Washington University Law School
    J.D.
    1990 Notes editor

    The George Washington University Law School
    J.D.
    George Washington University Law Review
    Other Education
    University of Wisconsin-Madison
    Class of 1983
    B.S.
    Industrial Engineering

    Case Western Reserve University
    Class of 1984
    M.B.A.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1961
    1961

Email Douglas R. Weider

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Douglas R. Weider was admitted in 1998 to the State of Connecticut.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Douglas R. Weider is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP has 2750 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Douglas R. Weider attended The George Washington University Law School.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP was established in 1967.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions