Acerca de Iram P. Valentin

Iram P. Valentin es un abogado litigante con especialización en litigios comerciales complejos y defensa de responsabilidad profesional. Además, ha litigado con éxito asuntos medioambientales y de responsabilidad civil extracontractual por productos tóxicos. El Sr. Valentin ha obtenido varios veredictos del jurado de defensa en nombre de abogados y empresas de seguros. Fue seleccionado como Rising Star de New Jersey Super Lawyers en 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013 y 2014, nombrado (201) en la lista "Bergen County's Top Lawyers" de la revista en litigios comerciales en 2011 y reconocido en la lista "40 under 40" del New Jersey Law Journal para el 2011. El Sr. Valentin está certificado como abogado de litigante por la Corte Suprema de New Jersey. El Sr. Valentin se desempeñó como asistente legal del Honorable Joseph P. Perfilio, del Tribunal Superior de New Jersey, Condado de Union, y fue pasante del Honorable Denny Chin, Tribunal de Distrito de los EE. UU. para el Distrito Sur de New York, actualmente designado para el Tribunal de Apelaciones del Segundo Circuito. Graduado de Fordham University School of Law, fue editor de notas y artículos en el Journal of Corporate & Financial Law. El Sr. Valentin habla español con fluidez.

 

Premios

Comentarios para Iram P. Valentin

¿Ha consultado o contratado a este abogado?

Deja una reseña sobre tu experiencia con este abogado.

Escribe una reseña

Calificación General

Servicios

Áreas de derecho

  • Legislación Comercial 1
    • Litigios Comerciales
  • Otra 2
    • Responsabilidad Profesional/Errores y omisiones
    • Litigio de Delitos Civiles Ambientales, por Tóxicos y Agravio público

Detalles de la Práctica

  • Idiomas
    Spanish
  • Información de pago
    Funciones de pago y costos
    Consulta inicial gratis
    Honorarios fijos
  • Información del bufete de abogados
    Título profesional
    Partner
    Nombre del bufete de abogados
    Kaufman Dolowich LLP
  • Casos y transacciones representativas
    Casos
    Experience: Representative Matters: Bobowicz v. Holy Name Name Medical Center, Inc., et al. (New Jersey, Law Division, 2020) - In this sexual harassment/hostile work environment action, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Mr. Valentin's client, a physician, ruling that plaintiff wife could not sustain a claim for sexual harassment based upon admitted facts
    that her husb
    's claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress was barred by the Heart Balm Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:23-1,
    otherwise failed as a matter of law.
    Rosenblatt v. Stripto, et al.(New Jersey, Appellate Division, 2017) - In this legal malpractice action, the Appellate Division affirmed the trial court's evidentiary ruling
    grant of summary judgment in favor of Mr. Valentin's client due to plaintiff's failure to secure adequate expert testimony to establish proximate cause.
    Estate of Caruso v. Fin. Recoveries (U.S.D.C., N.J., 2017) -In this putative class action for alleged violations of the FDCPA, the United States District Court granted partial summary judgment in favor of Mr. Valentin's client, finding that plaintiff failed to show a particularized harm
    , therefore, lacked Article III st
    ing to maintain an action under 15 U.S.C. 1692f(8),
    also failed to establish the existence of a private cause of action for an alleged failure to post a bond under N.J.S.A. 45:18-1.
    Fox Paper, Ltd. v. Hanover Ins. Co., et al. (New Jersey, Law Division, 2016) - In this insurance broker malpractice action, the trial court held, among other things, that a conflict existed between the substantive law of New York
    New Jersey as it related to the duty of a broker to an insured
    , thus, New York's substantive law applied.
    Wolf v. Escala, et al. (U.S.D.C., N.J., 2015) - In this social worker malpractice action, the United States District Court dismissed 1983, constitutional, professional malpractice, unjust enrichment,
    disgorgement claims.
    Brown v. Lopez, et al. (New Jersey, Appellate Division, 2013) - In this decision, the Appellate Division upheld the grant of summary judgment in favor of the attorney for the seller of real estate, finding that there was nothing in the record to support the conclusion that he knowingly assisted the seller in defrauding the plaintiff or that he made any misrepresentations to her.
    Lew
    owski v. Hi-Tech Homes, Inc., et al. (New Jersey, Appellate Division, 2013) - In this decision, the Appellate Division affirmed the award of counsel fees to Mr. Valentin's client due to Plaintiffs' decision to take an improvident voluntary dismissal after summary judgment was filed by the Defendants. The matter was rem
    ed to the trial court for a determination of the amount of the award.
    Lieber v. Marcus (U.S.D.C., N.J., 2012) - In this decision, which was upheld in 2014, after motion for reconsideration, the United States District Court ruled that New Jersey's Entire Controversy Doctrine
    the doctrine of collateral estoppel precluded a second action raising legal malpractice claims not perfected in a prior state court action.
    Mendoza v. Metropolitan Group Property & Casualty Ins., et al. (New Jersey, Law Division, 2012)- Mr. Valentin represented Metropolitan Group (MetLife) in defense of a case brought by a Plaintiff seeking insurance proceeds. At trial, the burden was shifted to the defense to show that the Plaintiff had made a material misstatement of fact or fraudulent statement in connection with the insurance claim. Mr. Valentin secured a defense jury verdict in favor of MetLife.
    Triarsi v. BSC Group Services, LLC, et al. (New Jersey, Appellate Division, 2011) - In this decision published at 422 N.J. Super. 104, the Appellate Division clarified the application of the Affidavit of Merit statute to insurance professionals.
    West 133rd Street Realty Corp. v. F&L (New Jersey, Law Division, 2011) - Mr. Valentin represented an attorney in legal malpractice action arising from the attorney's representation of a corporation in the sale of commercial real estate. A no-cause jury verdict was secured for the defense.
    Viglione v. Biagiotti, Marino, et al. (New Jersey, Law Division, 2010) - Mr. Valentin represented an attorney in legal malpractice action arising from attorney's representation of client in divorce action. A no-cause verdict was secured for the defense at binding arbitration.
    Mancini v. McAllister Fuels (New Jersey, Appellate Division, 2010) - Mr. Valentin represented a regional energy company in a toxic tort
    wrongful death action. The Appellate Division affirmed the grant of summary judgment due to plaintiff's failure to secure sufficient expert testimony.
    Bergen v. Able Energy (New Jersey, Appellate Division 2009) - Mr. Valentin represented a regional energy company against personal injury claims brought by employees in connection with a propane explosion. The Appellate Division affirmed the grant of summary judgment in favor of the employer
    affirmed the finding that the employees' claims against employer were barred by the exclusivity provision of the Workers' Compensation Act.
    Shah v. S&K (New Jersey, Law Division, 2009) - Mr. Valentin represented an attorney in legal malpractice action resulting from the attorney's appointment as an attorney-in-fact during an underlying divorce action. A no-cause jury verdict was secured for the defense.
    Rego v. Giordano (New Jersey, Law Division, 2008) - Mr. Valentin represented an attorney in legal malpractice action arising from the the attorney's h
    ling of a fire insurance claim. The court allowed defendants to prosecute plaintiffs for committing a fraud on the court when it was discovered that they had altered documents in discovery. A defense jury verdict was secured, whereupon the court dismissed plaintiffs' suit.
    Community Service: Paramus Sunrise Rotary Club - Immediate Past President/Board of Directors, 2019-2020
    President, 2018-19
    Vice President, 2017-18
    Visiting Homemaker Home Health Aide Service of Bergen County - Trustee on Volunteer Board, 2011-2019
    Compliance Officer
    Chair: Program, Personnel & Compliance/Quality Assurance Committee
    Paramus Junior Baseball League Volunteer Assistant Coach, 2018
    Recreation Softball Volunteer Assistant Coach, Paramus, NJ, 2017
    Recreation Youth Soccer Volunteer Coach, Paramus, NJ, 2016
  • Enlaces adicionales

Experiencia

  • Admisión y membresía al Colegio de Abogados
    Admisiones
    2002, New Jersey
    U.S. District Court, New Jersey
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Membresías

    Professional Memberships

    •New Jersey Supreme Court Committee on Complementary Dispute Resolution
    HBA-NJ Representative (2015-2017
    2017-2019
    2019-2021 cycles)
    •New Jersey Supreme Court Civil Practice Rules Committee, HBA-NJ Representative (2014)
    •Bergen County Bar Association, Professionalism in the Law Committee Member
    Diversity in the Profession Committee
    •Hispanic Bar Association of New Jersey
    •Hispanic National Bar Association
    •New Jersey Statewide Hispanic Chamber of Commerce (Past Member)
    •Morris Pashman American Inn of Court, Pupil Graduate
    Barrister (2016 - 2018)
    •American Bar Association

  • Educación y certificaciones
    Facultad de derecho
    Fordham University School of Law
    J.D.
    Otra educación
    College of the Holy Cross
    B.A.
    cum laude
El tipo de caso es obligatorio.
Yo soy es requerido.
El primer nombre es obligatorio.
El apellido es obligatorio.
Es obligatorio ingresar un código postal válido.
El país es obligatorio.
El estado es obligatorio.
Es obligatorio ingresar una ciudad válida.
Es obligatorio ingresar una dirección de correo electrónico válida.
Es obligatorio ingresar un número de teléfono valido.
Es obligatorio ingresar un mensaje.
0/1000 caracteres

Al hacer clic en el botón ENVIAR, acepta los Términos de Uso, los Términos Adicionales y la Política de Privacidad. También acepta que nos comuniquemos con usted al número de teléfono que proporcionó, incluso a través de marcados automáticos, mensajes de texto y/o llamadas pregrabadas de Lawyers.com y sus afiliados, y de o en nombre de los abogados que solicite ocontacte a través de este sitio. El consentimiento no es una condición de compra.

No debe enviar ninguna información sensible o confidencial a través de este sitio. Los correos electrónicos enviados a través de este sitio no crean una relación entre el abogado y el cliente y no pueden ser tratados como privilegiados o confidenciales. El abogado o bufete de abogados con el que se está contactando no está obligado a aceptarlo como cliente y puede decidir no hacerlo. Internet no necesariamente es un medio seguro, y los correos electrónicos enviados a través de este sitio podrían ser interceptados o leídos por terceros.

Este sitio está protegido por reCAPTCHA. Consulte la Política de privacidad y las Condiciones del servicio de Google.

Gracias. Su mensaje ha sido enviado con éxito.

Para sus registros, se envió una copia de este correo electrónico a test@test.com.

Resumen de su mensaje
Tipo de caso:
Soy un:
Primer nombre:
Apellido:
Ciudad:
Código postal:
Estado:
País:
Número de teléfono:
Mensaje: